This Community is For Sale - For more information contact: admin@calhockey.com

Author Topic: Bantam AA 16/17  (Read 153107 times)

1hockeydad

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • LR Justice +12/-3
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #150 on: September 26, 2016, 10:07:35 AM »
Looks like some big wins by JD1, OC1, Bears, and Wave.

Pistonkev

  • AHL
  • *****
  • Posts: 648
  • LR Justice +157/-30
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #151 on: September 26, 2016, 10:34:26 AM »
Looks like some big wins by JD1, OC1, Bears, and Wave.

What was the Wave score over Ducks?

1hockeydad

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • LR Justice +12/-3
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #152 on: September 26, 2016, 10:57:30 AM »
Looks like some big wins by JD1, OC1, Bears, and Wave.

What was the Wave score over Ducks?

On CAHA, 10 -1 win for Wave over JD2.

Panther Coach

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
  • LR Justice +41/-21
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #153 on: September 26, 2016, 11:36:32 AM »
Looks like some big wins by JD1, OC1, Bears, and Wave.

What was the Wave score over Ducks?

On CAHA, 10 -1 win for Wave over JD2.

I would have expected the JD1 and OC1 game scores but I thought the Bears v OC2 and Wave v JD2 would have been more competitive. 

BlindZebras

  • AHL
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
  • LR Justice +121/-201
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #154 on: September 26, 2016, 12:39:12 PM »
Definitely thought the Wave vs. Ducks(2) was gonna be tighter.  The Wave struggled putting the puck in the net during the two preseason games, despite out-shooting both opponents.  They seemed to figure things out yesterday, against a Ducks team that may have just under-performed.


Not surprised about the Bears vs. OC(2) score though, I think there's a decent talent gap there.

Panther Coach

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
  • LR Justice +41/-21
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #155 on: September 26, 2016, 01:45:49 PM »
Definitely thought the Wave vs. Ducks(2) was gonna be tighter.  The Wave struggled putting the puck in the net during the two preseason games, despite out-shooting both opponents.  They seemed to figure things out yesterday, against a Ducks team that may have just under-performed.


Not surprised about the Bears vs. OC(2) score though, I think there's a decent talent gap there.


Last years Bantam AA seemed a lot closer in terms of competitive teams top to bottom.  The JK's were the only team that got smoked while the rest had tighter competitive games.  Last year was also mostly major year teams while this one seems mixed to minor.  At this level teams shouldn't have double digit blowouts each week.

The Hun

  • Guest
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #156 on: September 26, 2016, 02:05:34 PM »
Definitely thought the Wave vs. Ducks(2) was gonna be tighter.  The Wave struggled putting the puck in the net during the two preseason games, despite out-shooting both opponents.  They seemed to figure things out yesterday, against a Ducks team that may have just under-performed.


Yep, they slightly under-performed...
It also helped that the Wave didn't hit the post 6 times (only 2 times), like last week, against the Kings.
There are days when everything goes in, and days when the puck finds a way to stay out after 30 shots. Hockey is funny, that way.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2016, 02:06:23 PM by The Hun »

Puck Yeah

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
  • LR Justice +110/-51
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #157 on: September 26, 2016, 02:54:21 PM »
What was the outcome of the Wave vs Kings game prior?

Panther Coach

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
  • LR Justice +41/-21
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #158 on: September 26, 2016, 08:13:48 PM »
Game of the week this weekend. OC2 vs Ducks 2. Who will bounce back?

BlindZebras

  • AHL
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
  • LR Justice +121/-201
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #159 on: September 27, 2016, 07:26:59 AM »
What was the outcome of the Wave vs Kings game prior?
Wave beat Wildcats 3-1 two weeks ago, and tied the Kings 2-2 last week.  I give credit to the defense and goal tenders on both teams because the Wave really struggled to put it in the net in both games.  A LOT of post shots and missed opportunities left on the ice.  The Ducks though, they had a solid tender in the net but he must've just had an off day, and his defense didn't do him any favors...
« Last Edit: September 27, 2016, 07:28:00 AM by BlindZebras »

The Hun

  • Guest
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #160 on: September 27, 2016, 10:47:15 AM »
Quote
Wave beat Wildcats 3-1 two weeks ago, and tied the Kings 2-2 last week.  I give credit to the defense and goal tenders on both teams because the Wave really struggled to put it in the net in both games.  A LOT of post shots and missed opportunities left on the ice.  The Ducks though, they had a solid tender in the net but he must've just had an off day, and his defense didn't do him any favors...
Quote

Plus, the fact that each of those games, a couple of forwards missed games (injury and personal reasons). And there was a suspension from the tournament before (Labor Day), that had to be served. So the offense was very depleted for a while and they played with two lines plus one player. This last game was the first time that they had a full roster, and one could feel the difference.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2016, 10:50:26 AM by The Hun »

Srt8bigm

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • LR Justice +0/-1
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #161 on: September 27, 2016, 09:58:09 PM »
Definitely thought the Wave vs. Ducks(2) was gonna be tighter.  The Wave struggled putting the puck in the net during the two preseason games, despite out-shooting both opponents.  They seemed to figure things out yesterday, against a Ducks team that may have just under-performed.


Not surprised about the Bears vs. OC(2) score though, I think there's a decent talent gap there.


Bears team will be a difficult team to beat for most teams in bantam AA including the top teams. For the OC2 team they loss 4 players already,  3 defenseman and 1 forward, that definitely didn't help. Ether way the bears team was good and impressive to watch, they will be tough to beat.

1hockeydad

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • LR Justice +12/-3
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #162 on: September 27, 2016, 10:33:27 PM »
Definitely thought the Wave vs. Ducks(2) was gonna be tighter.  The Wave struggled putting the puck in the net during the two preseason games, despite out-shooting both opponents.  They seemed to figure things out yesterday, against a Ducks team that may have just under-performed.


Not surprised about the Bears vs. OC(2) score though, I think there's a decent talent gap there.


Bears team will be a difficult team to beat for most teams in bantam AA including the top teams. For the OC2 team they loss 4 players already,  3 defenseman and 1 forward, that definitely didn't help. Ether way the bears team was good and impressive to watch, they will be tough to beat.

Lost players?  What has happened?

orangecone

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 58
  • LR Justice +14/-4
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #163 on: September 28, 2016, 07:57:32 AM »
Lost one to prep school and the rest are hurt. I would say the Bears are the most skilled team in Bantam AA that i've seen. OC2 is an 03 team with 2 02's.

goonhockey

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
  • LR Justice +21/-24
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #164 on: September 28, 2016, 10:42:33 AM »
some NorCal scores available, albeit exhibitions: http://ncyh.com/Schedules.html


combined with the scores down South, including preseason and a bit of CAHA, any rankings ahead of the first "weekend"?