Crash:
You keep alluding to things like this, and use words like "abuse". You keep playing the victim card, when the reality is that your team made choices and decisions that resulted in them playing Bantam A when they should have been playing AA. I've read probably every post you've created on the matter, so I'm not sure I understand who you've promised something to. I'm not going to lie and pretend I haven't found these posts entertaining at times, and kept things lively, but in all seriousness, there's no glorious victory in stomping a division of teams that you shouldn't have been playing in the first place.
Unlike the Riptide Peewee A last season, you were not constrained by rules pertaining to your entire club. Unlike the Riptide, you really had no basis for an appeal. From what I've been told, the Riptide lost the appeal to the CAHA board that would have had them play AA by one vote. The Riptide team ultimately accomplished what they did with 10 skaters on the roster.
There just is no comparison I can see to your situation, which stems from rules violations of your coach from the year prior.
Your team could have taken the high road, played an independent schedule and made your reputation on the basis of scrimmages and tournaments. I'm not saying that wouldn't have been difficult, but it was feasible alteranative for you, and I would think would have been more meaningful than a season punctuated by far too many games against teams you should never have been playing that you were able to easily beat by 7-10 goals.
At any rate, good luck to your squad next season. Teams at this age don't tend to last long, as there are so many forces at play which pull them apart, given either success or failure.
Topic: Bantam A (Read 75303 times)