Pee Wee A 2016-17

[Hockey05]

I heard the Wave 2 lost 9-1 and that they won't drop because 3 of their players will look elsewhere and not re-sign.  I do not understand why they are not forced by SCAHA to play down.

[trans4761]

I heard the Wave 2 lost 9-1 and that they won't drop because 3 of their players will look elsewhere and not re-sign.  I do not understand why they are not forced by SCAHA to play down.

                                                           

                                                                                $$$$$$$$

[mcca]

Odd that Wave 2/Maple Leafs  and OC/ Saints scores haven't been posted.  Our Wave 2 and Saints dropping?  Anyone know the scoress?

I believe it was OC 10  Saints 2

[station26]

I heard the Wave 2 lost 9-1 and that they won't drop because 3 of their players will look elsewhere and not re-sign.  I do not understand why they are not forced by SCAHA to play down.

                                                           

                                                                                $$$$$$$$

What He said....

[SkatingDad]

I heard the Wave 2 lost 9-1 and that they won't drop because 3 of their players will look elsewhere and not re-sign.  I do not understand why they are not forced by SCAHA to play down.

                                                           

                                                                                $$$$$$$$

What He said....

Wave 2 is 1-8-0 in 9 games with 62 GA 10 GF.  The only team they beat was an out of state team which was basically an in house team. If I were one of the parents on that team, I would be pissed at those 3 family's.  It's going to be a long season driving 2 hours watching you team lose by double digits. The kids will not develop if they are chasing in their defending zone the entire game. This is a case where SCAHA should step in and force drop the team and keep the LOI in place.

[MO-ICETIME]

I heard the Wave 2 lost 9-1 and that they won't drop because 3 of their players will look elsewhere and not re-sign.  I do not understand why they are not forced by SCAHA to play down.

                                                           

                                                                                $$$$$$$$

What He said....

Wave 2 is 1-8-0 in 9 games with 62 GA 10 GF.  The only team they beat was an out of state team which was basically an in house team. If I were one of the parents on that team, I would be pissed at those 3 family's.  It's going to be a long season driving 2 hours watching you team lose by double digits. The kids will not develop if they are chasing in their defending zone the entire game. This is a case where SCAHA should step in and force drop the team and keep the LOI in place.

If this is really the case, they should drop and let those 3 families just go! They are loosing now with those 3 kids, so without them they could drop to BB or even B. If the other kids are struggling that much, they are not going to see much development at A anyway with 3 kids doing everything. At least in B they would touch the puck a whole lot more and that's contributes to development. Seems my theme of what am I missing applies here too.


What am I missing??

[hockeymom48]

I heard, that if they release those players they don't have enough to field a team. They would have to fold. Their roster shows 14 players. That would leave them with 11 players.

[MO-ICETIME]

I heard, that if they release those players they don't have enough to field a team. They would have to fold. Their roster shows 14 players. That would leave them with 11 players.

Makes sense... I think they could pull off 10 skaters plus 1 goalie at PeeWee B. Looks like the Lions are doing that now in PeeWee B.

[Just Saying]

I heard, that if they release those players they don't have enough to field a team. They would have to fold. Their roster shows 14 players. That would leave them with 11 players.

Makes sense... I think they could pull off 10 skaters plus 1 goalie at PeeWee B. Looks like the Lions are doing that now in PeeWee B.

Two SQA teams do this (Ducks - EK/Artesia) and kick butt. What's the problem?

[6607]

Scaha rules allow squirt teams to play with 10 players. Same rules require pee wee teams to have 12 players.

[station26]

Let a team fold??? Now if you own an ice house where you have just had 14 people commit a shitload of money to you why in the world would you let these people out of their LOI no matter how bad the team is.. Folks its the money.. The money!!  You are rationalizing as decent folks with no money to lose unlike the owner of this team.. There is no decency in these ice houses when a pocket is being filled. KNOW THIS!

[Puck Yeah]

Let a team fold??? Now if you own an ice house where you have just had 14 people commit a shitload of money to you why in the world would you let these people out of their LOI no matter how bad the team is.. Folks its the money.. The money!!  You are rationalizing as decent folks with no money to lose unlike the owner of this team.. There is no decency in these ice houses when a pocket is being filled. KNOW THIS!

The Money, the Money?  yes, but I think that is why we all get out of bed in the morning isn't it?  Nothing is stopping you from building a rink and being altruistic and building up youth hockey by letting kids play for free.


I don't think that these rinks are that lucrative of a business in SoCal.  Rinks like every other business is in business...... to make money.

[station26]

and here I was thinking those powers that be were trying to grow the sport in So Cal.. Silly me, between that and believing 30,000 emails was an accident has caused me to rethink myself.

[MO-ICETIME]

Great another political board I may start avoiding now. Is no place safe??

[6607]

 Adjusted Standings.  Not a power ranking. 
 
 
1.     Ducks 2 (9-0.)   Beat Eagles 8-4.  Next up: JK1
2.     Bears (7-0-2.)  Beat JK1 7-3.  Next  up:  Condors
3.     OC 1 (6-1-1).  Beat  Sts. 9-2.  Next up:  Maple Leafs
3.     OC 2 (6-1-1).   Beat JK2  8-0.  Next up: Mariners
5.     Wave 1 (5-2-2).  Lost 3-0 to Ducks 1.  Next up: Saints
6.     Ducks 1 (6-3.) Beat Wave 1, 3-0 and lost 3-0 to Heat.  Next up: OC3
6.     OC 3 (6-3.) Beat Lady Ducks 6-2.   Next up: Ducks
6.     Wave 3 (6-3.)  Beat Blaze 5-3.  Next up: Lady Ducks
 * * *
9.     Heat  (4-2-2 .) Beat Ducks 1, 3-0.  Next up: WC2
10.   Maple Leafs (4-4.)  Beat Wave 2, 10-1.  Next up: OC1
11.   Ontario Eagles (3-4-1).  Lost to Ducks 2, 8-4.  Next up: JK2
12.   Saints (3-5.)  Lost to OC1, 9-2.  Next up:  Wave 1
12.   Condors  (3-5.)  Beat WC1 13-1.  Next up:  Bears
13.   Kings 1 (2-5-1.)  Lost to Bears 7-3.   Next up: Eagles
14.   Blaze (2-6.)  Lost to Wave 3, 5-3.  Next up:  WC1
15.   Wave 2 (1-7.)  Lost to PML 10-1. Next up:  Bye
16.   Mariners (1-7).  Beat WC2, 6-4.  Next up: OC2. 
17.   Kings 2 (0-6-2.)  Lost to OC2, 8-0. Next up: Eagles
18.   Wildcats 1 (0-4.)  Lost to Condors 13-1.  Next up: Blaze.
19.   Wildcats 2 (0-4.) Lost to Mariners 8 6-4.  Next up:  Heat.

Wildcats 1 and 2 and Mariners are dropping out of PWA.  J Gulls and Wildcats are dropping into PW A.