This Community is For Sale - For more information contact: admin@calhockey.com

Author Topic: Pee Wee A 2016-17  (Read 333569 times)

6607

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
  • LR Justice +36/-53
  • So how about it boys? Look like hockey to you?
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #600 on: February 26, 2017, 11:11:18 AM »
OC (3) and Ducks (2) tied 1-1.  Other scores?

MO-ICETIME

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
  • LR Justice +22/-24
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #601 on: February 26, 2017, 06:01:47 PM »
OC (3) and Ducks (2) tied 1-1.  Other scores?


I called it, OC3 is a tough team! Congrats on the Tie and battling into a playoff spot!

MO-ICETIME

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
  • LR Justice +22/-24
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #602 on: February 26, 2017, 06:07:01 PM »
Also seems the final game between Eagles and OC3 will be a big one too! Awesome hockey this season!

station26

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
  • LR Justice +133/-92
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #603 on: February 26, 2017, 06:22:48 PM »
Pound for pound that #35 goalie for OC3 is legit. He might be smaller but he battles and reads plays/ shots well..

LAhockey

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 44
  • LR Justice +26/-25
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #604 on: February 26, 2017, 06:30:20 PM »
Pound for pound that #35 goalie for OC3 is legit. He might be smaller but he battles and reads plays/ shots well..


That kids tracks the puck like a pro!

MO-ICETIME

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
  • LR Justice +22/-24
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #605 on: February 27, 2017, 04:19:40 PM »
Does anyone know why the Wave1 vs OC2 game was a forfeit?

6607

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
  • LR Justice +36/-53
  • So how about it boys? Look like hockey to you?
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #606 on: February 27, 2017, 04:54:08 PM »
Wave 1 went to Fargo, I believe

jjyoung909

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • LR Justice +1/-1

MO-ICETIME

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
  • LR Justice +22/-24
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #608 on: February 27, 2017, 09:46:07 PM »
Wave 1 went to Fargo, I believe


Wonder if they would have gone if they were in the middle of a playoff hunt??

Avcadet

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • LR Justice +7/-7
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #609 on: February 28, 2017, 07:55:28 AM »
Wave 1 went to Fargo, I believe


Wonder if they would have gone if they were in the middle of a playoff hunt??
That is a Squirt level tournament. What happened to the kids on the team that are over-aged?

MO-ICETIME

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
  • LR Justice +22/-24
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #610 on: February 28, 2017, 08:10:21 AM »
Wave 1 went to Fargo, I believe


Wonder if they would have gone if they were in the middle of a playoff hunt??
That is a Squirt level tournament. What happened to the kids on the team that are over-aged?


Seems they don't care about the 05 kids?

SkatingDad

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
  • LR Justice +60/-91
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #611 on: February 28, 2017, 08:27:07 AM »
Wave 1 went to Fargo, I believe


Wonder if they would have gone if they were in the middle of a playoff hunt??
That is a Squirt level tournament. What happened to the kids on the team that are over-aged?


I understand that one of their goalies is an 04...


Seems they don't care about the 05 kids?

6607

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
  • LR Justice +36/-53
  • So how about it boys? Look like hockey to you?
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #612 on: February 28, 2017, 09:08:11 AM »
I don't have any first hand information, but we heard about this weeks if not months ago.  A W1 parent can correct this, but what we heard was that the intent to play Fargo was disclosed in advance to parents and that W1 was under impression that SCAHA would accommodate them on the schedule.  Also believe that the tourney allow some 05s to play in Squirt division.  Again, can't vouch for this. 

nirradus

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • LR Justice +9/-7
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #613 on: February 28, 2017, 09:27:27 AM »
Not true, OCHC2 has had only one goalie all season and he played all games. The lack of goals scored against shows that he did a great job


Not making this up -- An OC2 parent told me they let one of their goalies go earlier this season. It was very clear from our conversation that they had more than one goalie rostered this year. If Avcadet statement is true, then that parent lied to me. But our conversation was very specific about why they let that other goalie go so not really sure what's going on.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2017, 09:33:57 AM by nirradus »

#4BobbyOrr

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • LR Justice +98/-106
Re: Pee Wee A 2016-17
« Reply #614 on: February 28, 2017, 09:32:16 AM »
Here is some first hand info:


The Fargo tourney follows the Minnesota birth year, which means squirts for 2016/2017 includes anyone born on or after July 1, 2005.  The parents of any kids on W1 born before that date were told before they signed LOI's that the team would be travelling to this tourney and that their kids were not eligible.  But they were eligible for the Labor Day, Thanksgiving, New Year's, and President's Day tournaments so its not like they didn't get a lot of extra games in this season. 


Also apparently SCAHA approved for them to have a bye week in order to travel that weekend.  However, they still scheduled them for a game that weekend.   W1 notified SCAHA that they had mistakenly scheduled them for a game on a weekend that they had already been told they could take off to travel.  What do the ever so gracious schedulers at SCAHA do?  Instead of fixing the schedule they just decide to rescind the scheduling accommodation.Scheduling is hard, fixing mistakes is even harder.Already bought your plane tickets? Sorry. Already made a tournament deposit? Well I guess that's your problem.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2017, 09:34:12 AM by #4BobbyOrr »