Pee Wee AA 2018-19

[6607]

Dogs had 3 goals waved off, and officially outshot Reign 20–2, but must have had 35 or more actual shots on goal.

[Carl Henry]

Ducks 1 VS San Jose 5-1

[Disco Dan]

Anyone know records after today?  Thoughts?

[Ethicka]

It would be nice if someone would post all the scores for the games since CAHA isn't. 

[Carl Henry]

Ducks 1 vs Gulls 2-1
Ducks 1 vs San Jose 5-1

[Deuce]

Heard Ice Dogs 2 beat Wave 1 2-0

[Carl Henry]

Ducks 1 lost to ID1  2-1

[LetsGoRangers]

So based on the scored and Politics...I see flight 1 being:

ID 1Kings 1Gulls 1
Ducks 1GSE 2WaveBlackhawks?
Empire?
Sharks 1 as a political add?

[Rocket91]

Sharks1 was dominated in all 4 games. They should be going to flight2


vs Kings1 0-7
vs Gulls1 1-3
vs Ducks1 1-5
vs Ducks2 1-3

[Bear71]

Sharks1 was dominated in all 4 games. They should be going to flight2


vs Kings1 0-7
vs Gulls1 1-3
vs Ducks1 1-5
vs Ducks2 1-3

[TheFourthA]

Here’s what I have heard for scores and records for what I see as the Top 10 teams.   In trying to rank teams, I found that I relied on the eye test more than won-loss records for the teams that I watched.   The match-ups were not particularly helpful.  Given the format, I am not a big believer in placing a lot of value in close losses.  These were artificially close scrimmages.  The lesser teams benefited greatly from icing the puck to kill penalties and, in many of these scrimmages,  seemed to be spending all they had trying to stay in the game. My sense was that the third periods would have been ugly.
 
I see a pretty clear top 6, and 7-10 to my eye are something of a slippery slope. 
 
1.    Ice Dogs (1) (4-0): Beat Kings(1) 2-1, Reign 3-1; Ducks(2) 3-0, and Ducks(1) 2-1. 
 
2.    GSE(2)  (3-0-1):   Beat Ducks(2) 5-3, Gulls (2) (didn’t hear score), and  B’hawks 5-3.  Tied  Empire 2-2. 
 
3.    Kings (1) (2-1-1):  Lost to Ice Dogs (1) 2-1; Beat Sharks(1) 7-0 and GSE(1) 5-0.  Tied  Gulls (1) 2-2.  Dominated two Flight 2 teams and played tight games against likely Flight 1 teams.  Easily passes the eye test. 
 
4.   Gulls (1) (2-1-1):  Beat Sharks (1) 5-3; lost to Ducks (1) 2-1; beat  Kings(2) 6-1.  Tied Kings (1) 2-2.   
 
5.   Empire (3-0-1):  Beat GSE(1) 2-1, Ducks(2) 1-0,  and Reign 4-2.   Tied GSE(2) 2-2.
 
6.   Ducks (1) (2-1-1):  Tied Wave 1-1; beat Gulls (1) (2-1) and Sharks (1) 5-1.  Lost to Ice Dogs (1) 2-1.   Clearly belong in Top 6.   
 
If CAHA goes with a larger Flight 1 like last season:
 
7.   Blackhawks (2-2):  Lost to Kings(2) 3-2; Beat Sharks(2) 9-1 and Wave 3-2;  lost to GSE(2) 5-3.   In the games I watched, I don’t think they passed the eye test, but the last two match ups look like  they are in the running.
 
8.   Ice Dogs (2) (3-0-1).  Tied Gulls (2); Beat GSE(1) 2-0, OC 9-0, and Wave 2-0.  Not sure what the purpose of the Wave match-up would have been unless it was to fill the 8^th spot spot in Flight 1.  Would like to know if they rolled lines or relied on their top players.


 9.   Ducks (2) (1-3). Lost to GSE (2) 5-3, Empire 1-0, and ID(1) 3-0;  beat Sharks 1 (3-1).  Didn’t catch the Sharks (1) game – did D2 dominate but not reflected in score? Last match up does not look like one you would give a team that was being considered for Flight 1.  I had a hard time choosing between Wave and D2.  D2 play a more team oriented and tougher game.

10.  Wave (1-2-1).  Tied  Ducks (1); beat PML 5-1; Lost to B’Hawks 3-2 and ID(2) 2-0.  Losses to B’Hawks and ID(2) could be the dividing line. 

 
   

[keepdrinkinthekoolaid]

Here’s what I have heard for scores and records for what I see as the Top 10 teams.   In trying to rank teams, I found that I relied on the eye test more than won-loss records for the teams that I watched.   The match-ups were not particularly helpful. Given the format, I am not a big believer in placing a lot of value in close losses.  These were artificially close scrimmages. The lesser teams benefited greatly from icing the puck to kill penalties and, in many of these scrimmages,  seemed to be spending all they had trying to stay in the game. My sense was that the third periods would have been ugly.
I see a pretty clear top 6, and 7-10 to my eye are something of a slippery slope. 
1.    Ice Dogs (1) (4-0): Beat Kings(1) 2-1, Reign 3-1; Ducks(2) 3-0, and Ducks(1) 2-1. 
2.    GSE(2)  (3-0-1):   Beat Ducks(2) 5-3, Gulls (2) (didn’t hear score), and  B’hawks 5-3.  Tied  Empire 2-2. 
3.    Kings (1) (2-1-1):  Lost to Ice Dogs (1) 2-1; Beat Sharks(1) 7-0 and GSE(1) 5-0.  Tied  Gulls (1) 2-2.  Dominated two Flight 2 teams and played tight games against likely Flight 1 teams.  Easily passes the eye test. 
4.   Gulls (1) (2-1-1):  Beat Sharks (1) 5-3; lost to Ducks (1) 2-1; beat  Kings(2) 6-1.  Tied Kings (1) 2-2.   
5.   Empire (3-0-1):  Beat GSE(1) 2-1, Ducks(2) 1-0,  and Reign 4-2.   Tied GSE(2) 2-2.
6.   Ducks (1) (2-1-1):  Tied Wave 1-1; beat Gulls (1) (2-1) and Sharks (1) 5-1.  Lost to Ice Dogs (1) 2-1.   Clearly belong in Top 6.   
If CAHA goes with a larger Flight 1 like last season:
7.   Blackhawks (2-2):  Lost to Kings(2) 3-2; Beat Sharks(2) 9-1 and Wave 3-2;  lost to GSE(2) 5-3.   In the game I watched, I don’t think they passed the eye test, but the last two match ups look like  they are in the running.
8.   Ice Dogs (2) (3-0-1).  Tied Gulls (2); Beat GSE(1) 2-0, OC 9-0, and Wave 2-0.  Not sure what the purpose of the Wave match-up would have been unless it was to fill the 8^th spot spot in Flight 1.  Would like to know if they rolled lines or relied on their top players.
9.   Ducks (2) (1-3). Lost to GSE (2) 5-3, Empire 1-0, and ID(1) 3-0;  beat Sharks 1 (3-1).  Didn’t catch the Sharks (1) game – did D2 dominate but not reflected in score? Last match up does not look like one you would give a team that was being considered for Flight 1.  I had a hard time choosing between Wave and D2.  D2 play a more team oriented and tougher game.
10.  Wave (1-2-1).  Tied  Ducks (1); beat PML 5-1; Lost to B’Hawks 3-2 and ID(2) 2-0.  Losses to B’Hawks and ID(2) could be the dividing line. 

Sorry KJ, I think there is another parent who actually speaks the truth and bases his decisions on facts..
Would it be too much to ask to have you make a run at CAHA Board of Directors?  http://www.caha.com/directors.pl?t=1

Current President is non-responsive to email requests of at least an explanation of 25 minute halves being relegated to 20 minute halves, although; I did hear that a verbal answer of "that's all the time evaluators needed" was given to some parents. I'm sure a refund check from CAHA is in the mail to all our clubs.

I also did overhear a parent state,
"I feel like I ordered and paid for a Grande, got served a Tall & then am being told that is all the coffee I need"! 

Truer words have never been spoken!   

[give it a rip]

  Here’s what I have heard for scores and records for what I see as the Top 10 teams.   In trying to rank teams, I found that I relied on the eye test more than won-loss records for the teams that I watched.   The match-ups were not particularly helpful.  Given the format, I am not a big believer in placing a lot of value in close losses.  These were artificially close scrimmages.  The lesser teams benefited greatly from icing the puck to kill penalties and, in many of these scrimmages,  seemed to be spending all they had trying to stay in the game. My sense was that the third periods would have been ugly.
 
I see a pretty clear top 6, and 7-10 to my eye are something of a slippery slope. 
 
1.    Ice Dogs (1) (4-0): Beat Kings(1) 2-1, Reign 3-1; Ducks(2) 3-0, and Ducks(1) 2-1. 
 
2.    GSE(2)  (3-0-1):   Beat Ducks(2) 5-3, Gulls (2) (didn’t hear score), and  B’hawks 5-3.  Tied  Empire 2-2. 
 
3.    Kings (1) (2-1-1):  Lost to Ice Dogs (1) 2-1; Beat Sharks(1) 7-0 and GSE(1) 5-0.  Tied  Gulls (1) 2-2.  Dominated two Flight 2 teams and played tight games against likely Flight 1 teams.  Easily passes the eye test. 
 
4.   Gulls (1) (2-1-1):  Beat Sharks (1) 5-3; lost to Ducks (1) 2-1; beat  Kings(2) 6-1.  Tied Kings (1) 2-2.   
 
5.   Empire (3-0-1):  Beat GSE(1) 2-1, Ducks(2) 1-0,  and Reign 4-2.   Tied GSE(2) 2-2.
 
6.   Ducks (1) (2-1-1):  Tied Wave 1-1; beat Gulls (1) (2-1) and Sharks (1) 5-1.  Lost to Ice Dogs (1) 2-1.   Clearly belong in Top 6.   
 
If CAHA goes with a larger Flight 1 like last season:
 
7.   Blackhawks (2-2):  Lost to Kings(2) 3-2; Beat Sharks(2) 9-1 and Wave 3-2;  lost to GSE(2) 5-3.   In the game I watched, I don’t think they passed the eye test, but the last two match ups look like  they are in the running.
 
8.   Ice Dogs (2) (3-0-1).  Tied Gulls (2); Beat GSE(1) 2-0, OC 9-0, and Wave 2-0.  Not sure what the purpose of the Wave match-up would have been unless it was to fill the 8^th spot spot in Flight 1.  Would like to know if they rolled lines or relied on their top players.


 9.   Ducks (2) (1-3). Lost to GSE (2) 5-3, Empire 1-0, and ID(1) 3-0;  beat Sharks 1 (3-1).  Didn’t catch the Sharks (1) game – did D2 dominate but not reflected in score? Last match up does not look like one you would give a team that was being considered for Flight 1.  I had a hard time choosing between Wave and D2.  D2 play a more team oriented and tougher game.


10.  Wave (1-2-1).  Tied  Ducks (1); beat PML 5-1; Lost to B’Hawks 3-2 and ID(2) 2-0.  Losses to B’Hawks and ID(2) could be the dividing line. 

 
 

Looking at the final day match ups I think the only games they were really looking at were the first two.

JS1 vs JD2 and GSE1 vs Gulls2

The rest were clearly all Flight 1 vs Flight 1 and Flight 2 vs Flight 2 match ups.

Based on the results, it should be JD2 and Gulls2 who won their way into Flight 1.

[Rocket91]

Kings2 vs Blackhawks 3-2
Flyers vs Reign 0-4
Kings1 vs Ice Dogs1 1-2
Maple Leafs vs OC 2-2
Ducks1 vs Wave 1-1
Gulls2 vs Ice Dogs2  ?
GSE1 vs Empire 1-2
Gulls1 vs Sharks1 3-1
Ducks2 vs GSE2 3-5
Sharks2 vs Blackhawks 1-9

Reign vs Ice Dogs1 1-3
Sharks1 vs Kings1 0-7
Ducks2 vs Empire 0-1
Gulls1 vs Ducks1 1-2
OC vs Flyers ?
GSE1 vs Ice Dogs2 0-2
GSE2 vs Gulls2 ?
Wave vs Maple Leafs 5-1
Kings2 vs Sharks2 1-0
Ducks1 vs Sharks1 5-1
Kings1 vs GSE1 5-0
Empire vs Reign 4-2
Gulls1 vs Kings2 6-1
Wave vs Blackhawks 2-3
Ice Dogs1 vs Ducks2 3-0
Ice Dogs2 vs OC ?
Maple Leafs VS Gulls2 ?
Flyers vs Sharks2 2-3
GSE2 vs Blackhawks 5-3

Sharks1 vs Ducks2 1-3
GSE1 vs Gulls2 1-2
Reign vs Maple Leafs ?
Kings1 vs Gulls1 2-2
Empire vs GSE2 1-2
Sharks2 vs OC 1-0
Ice Dogs1 vs Ducks1 2-1
Kings2 vs Flyers ?
Wave vs Ice Dogs2 0-2

[TheFourthA]

What were the scores in the Gulls2 games?


Sharks 1 and GSE 1 took bad losses against Kings1; don’t think that a 4th game match up with either of them is a good sign.