This Community is For Sale - For more information contact: admin@calhockey.com

Author Topic: Pee Wee AA 2018-19  (Read 189804 times)

NotfromSoCal

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 46
  • LR Justice +4/-19
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #255 on: September 12, 2018, 07:45:10 PM »
I think the Sharks 2 got moved to Squirt BB where they might be competitive.    Did you not watch any of the games at the jamboree?

Rocket91

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • LR Justice +0/-0
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #256 on: September 12, 2018, 08:23:53 PM »
Sharks2 beat OC at the jamboree. 1-0

NotfromSoCal

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 46
  • LR Justice +4/-19
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #257 on: September 12, 2018, 08:40:26 PM »
OC just lost 10-0 to a team of ‘08 players.  They are both terrrrble as Charles Barkley would say.  They gave Sharks benefit of a prove me game and they lost to Vacaville A.  Enough is enough already.  It’s tier hockey, not everyone gets a trophy.  Probably several others that should have lost an A. 

Disco Dan

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • LR Justice +17/-32
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #258 on: September 12, 2018, 08:53:10 PM »
OC just lost 10-0 to a team of ‘08 players.  They are both terrrrble as Charles Barkley would say.  They gave Sharks benefit of a prove me game and they lost to Vacaville A.  Enough is enough already.  It’s tier hockey, not everyone gets a trophy.  Probably several others that should have lost an A.


Considering Kings 2 beat the Blackhawks 3-2 in an even game, then outplayed the much larger Sharks in what should have been a worse beating than 1-0, and lost 5-3 to Runtso Ducks in an even game, I'm not certain how one can claim Kings 2 are a squirt team.  Clearly they are beyond that.  The win over OC also proves PWA is not the right fit.  From my view, CAHA got the Flights correct based on what I saw in Valencia.

NotfromSoCal

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 46
  • LR Justice +4/-19
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #259 on: September 12, 2018, 09:09:54 PM »
I can’t argue that Kings 2 belong where they are.  My point is OC doesn’t and nobody should be surprised Sharks 2 disappeared.  Rocketman91 was trying to make some kind of a point that Sharks 2 beat OC 1-0 so for some reason belong in AA.  All that game proved is that OC is just as bad or worse than the Sharks.

Disco Dan

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • LR Justice +17/-32
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #260 on: September 12, 2018, 09:22:54 PM »
I can’t argue that Kings 2 belong where they are.  My point is OC doesn’t and nobody should be surprised Sharks 2 disappeared.  Rocketman91 was trying to make some kind of a point that Sharks 2 beat OC 1-0 so for some reason belong in AA.  All that game proved that OC is just as bad or worse than the Sharks.


I agree completely.

Go Kings_26

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 87
  • LR Justice +6/-22
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #261 on: September 13, 2018, 08:00:44 AM »
How did Blackhawks make flight 1?

keepdrinkinthekoolaid

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • LR Justice +16/-3
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #262 on: September 13, 2018, 10:08:04 AM »

How did Blackhawks make flight 1?

Either

a) geographical location in California
OR
b) possibly club history and reputation
From their websites about us page: "For 48 years, the Santa Clara Blackhawks have been a non-profit hockey club fielding competitive teams at the B, A, and Tier II (AA) levels"


Are CONGRATULATIONS in order?  The Valencia "eyetest" as well as looking at results of past scrimmages this alleged competitive team has a long season ahead of them.  Also, this club did place #8 in Flt 1 last year for the PlayDowns, ahead of Flt 1 #9-GSE2 & #10-Jr Ducks2 BUT only to lose to the Flt II #1 - Valencia Flyers.
« Last Edit: September 13, 2018, 11:40:06 AM by keepdrinkinthekoolaid »

TheFourthA

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 78
  • LR Justice +13/-5
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #263 on: September 13, 2018, 01:23:03 PM »
Perhaps CAHA felt that the B'Hawks were demonstrably better than the 8 teams they selected for Flight 2?  I am not a big fan of the Jamboree (in part because it places too great a premium on CAHA getting the match-ups for the two pre-set rounds right), but coming out of the Jamboree I had the B'hawks at 7, even if they were not playing what I thought of as an AA style of hockey.

At the time, I thought there was a noticeable gap between the B'hawks and the top 6 teams, but that the Wave or D2 were more likely to be a bubble team in a larger Flight 1. After last weekend's games, I suspect that  the differences in the teams from top to bottom might be smaller than I thought last week and that the dividing point may be between 4 and 5.

As an aside, I think K2 and D2 are both very interesting teams. I like their upside and dislike a system where one of them is necessarily eliminated from the playoffs before a single regular season game has been played. 



 

 


CanAmWest

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • LR Justice +0/-1
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #264 on: September 13, 2018, 02:39:29 PM »
If everyone is going to fashion opinion at least report factual data.  OC did not play Jr. Kings as so don’t know where that post came from?  They had a play-in against GoldRush - won 3-1 and for most part controlled game.  Past weekend played Jr. Reign - 2-2 tie and again for most part controlled game.   


Given time all teams will improve during the year, some faster than others.  Don’t already go crowning a champion unless the Jr. Kings and Jr. Ducks loyalists insist on jabs at each other. 


This group of armchair general managers would suggest the Toronto Marlies would be the logical choice to replace the lowly Sabres or Senators the way they offer their expertise. 


Keep the opinions (because that’s all they are) flowing because these comments are entertaining to read, great banter back and forth but just let the kids play.   8)

White Skates

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • LR Justice +1/-0
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #265 on: September 13, 2018, 04:20:37 PM »
OC did indeed play Kings—Kings2
I watched the game?

hockeyfan2008

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • LR Justice +0/-13
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #266 on: September 13, 2018, 04:41:53 PM »
CanAmWest is just not telling the truth.

I have a son on OCHC.   We played the Kings 2 on Sunday at Lakewood(Rink B).   We lost 10-0.   Not sure what part of that is hard to grasp

JustAnotherHockeyParent

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 64
  • LR Justice +1/-4
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #267 on: September 13, 2018, 05:50:42 PM »
Did OCHC PW A or OCHC PW AA play Kings 2?

CanAmWest

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • LR Justice +0/-1
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #268 on: September 13, 2018, 06:25:52 PM »
It wasn’t OC’s PWAA.

In The Crease

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 55
  • LR Justice +38/-12
Re: Pee Wee AA 2018-19
« Reply #269 on: September 13, 2018, 08:23:08 PM »
CanAmWest is just not telling the truth.

I have a son on OCHC.   We played the Kings 2 on Sunday at Lakewood(Rink B).   We lost 10-0.   Not sure what part of that is hard to grasp


What is hard to grasp is that you can't seem to understand you are not on the AA team.  The Kings2 played your "A" team to prove they should stay up in AA.  Your posting completely miscommunicated and misrepresented teams.