Author Topic: 16U AA 22-23  (Read 1889 times)

JagrBomb

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • LR Justice +5/-0
Re: 16U AA 22-23
« Reply #15 on: September 01, 2022, 02:10:05 PM »
Needs to have stiffer consequences and target 2 clubs in particular as they manage most of the multi-sheet rinks in SoCal now.  A lot of the smaller clubs that do have Tier 2 may only have 1 sheet facilities so it won't help, unless Tier 2 weekends are split across facilities.  Kings and Ducks run something like 7 multi-sheet facilities between them?  Force them to host and actually support the growth of hockey in SoCal or lose Tier 1.  After all, CAHA based a clubs ability to have Tier 1 on the number of registered hockey players anyways, so it not performance based by any means.

trans4761

  • NHL
  • ******
  • Posts: 1011
  • LR Justice +286/-311
Re: 16U AA 22-23
« Reply #16 on: September 01, 2022, 04:04:20 PM »
Even the single sheet rinks should host.  Use multiple rinks.  The distance between some is not that great.

goonhockey

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
  • LR Justice +21/-24
Re: 16U AA 22-23
« Reply #17 on: September 01, 2022, 09:18:01 PM »
Even the single sheet rinks should host.  Use multiple rinks.  The distance between some is not that great.


even san jose is using the fremont rink (1 sheet) to have games at the 1st weekend and thats 17.5 miles away

Rats13

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
  • LR Justice +16/-2
Re: 16U AA 22-23
« Reply #18 on: September 07, 2022, 08:13:07 AM »
  Kings and Ducks run something like 7 multi-sheet facilities between them?  Force them to host and actually support the growth of hockey in SoCal or lose Tier 1.  After all, CAHA based a clubs ability to have Tier 1 on the number of registered hockey players anyways, so it not performance based by any means.


You do know which clubs control CAHA right?  :D

JagrBomb

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • LR Justice +5/-0
Re: 16U AA 22-23
« Reply #19 on: September 07, 2022, 10:13:59 AM »
I do.  Purchasing power still exists though and parents can have a voice when it comes to how their own money is being forced to be spent.  A good 3/4 of California hockey is being forced to spend all of this extra money when 90% of their events are in NorCal.  That is in no way helping keep kids around the game locally, and I have seen it first hand.  Clubs having reduced team counts from last year, parents expressing regret at doing another season this year, some purposely playing down in A to avoid the travel or just walking away altogether.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2022, 10:17:10 AM by JagrBomb »

CA_HockeyDad

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • LR Justice +0/-0
Re: 16U AA 22-23
« Reply #20 on: September 07, 2022, 01:48:57 PM »
CAHA purportedly will be taking steps to address the SoCal shortfall on bids for Tier 2 events, will be tied to requiring Clubs that field certain number of teams to provide ice slots for CAHA Weekends

trans4761

  • NHL
  • ******
  • Posts: 1011
  • LR Justice +286/-311
Re: 16U AA 22-23
« Reply #21 on: September 19, 2022, 04:37:42 PM »
Consensus of this weekends Caha weekend.....A)  some solid teams but no one is unbeatable.  Any of the top 5-6 teams could beat each other (as of now) and B) OC has some nutty parents.


JMHO  :P

vrspartak

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • LR Justice +0/-0
Re: 16U AA 22-23
« Reply #22 on: September 20, 2022, 11:23:00 AM »
Consensus of this weekends Caha weekend.....A)  some solid teams but no one is unbeatable.  Any of the top 5-6 teams could beat each other (as of now) and B) OC has some nutty parents.


JMHO  :P


Yeah, top 5-6 teams will be interesting to watch.  Those games will all be close.

2 Cups in LA

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
  • LR Justice +8/-31
Re: 16U AA 22-23
« Reply #23 on: September 21, 2022, 04:26:52 PM »
Regardless of the travel sport your kid is playing.   Every team has at least one nutty parent!