Author Topic: Pee Wee A 19-20  (Read 17022 times)

trans4761

  • AHL
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • LR Justice +276/-228
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #75 on: November 22, 2019, 01:13:16 PM »
That would create an unbalanced schedule.  Could hear it now....Team X played all the shitty teams.  My like Gretz team played all the hard teams.....yadda....yadda.....yadda. There is no difference in price from A to BB ( at least not at our club) 
Blame the parents that think their Lil Bender. Is the next great one.

WTF

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • LR Justice +9/-12
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #76 on: November 22, 2019, 03:48:15 PM »
You’ve fixed it. All you have to do is give more power to a benevolent centralized organization that has a track record for making all of the right decisions on implementation.


So, not SCAHA, got it. 


I have been proposing this balance for years.  Allowing clubs to choose needs accountability.  Stop guaranteeing the 20 games!  Maybe, if you play in the wrong division, as in the 21 teams in PW A, at the 10 game mark (5 pre/5 reg) which is usually around End of November, IF YOUR TEAM IS NOT IN THE TOP 16, YOUR SEASON IS OVER!  GOODBYE!  ... and players are not allowed to join other teams as it is after the final roster date in December.


That'll show 'em.


Interesting concept, almost a little too statistically pure but who knows even a blind squirrel will find a nut.    BTW how do you explain the traditionally smaller divisions of 14b and 12b of 10 and 8 team divisions where the bottom dwellers traditionally get blown out or would that just blow your statistically pure concept out of the water?


If you strongly believe in this plan propose it to your club president who can take it to the other club presidents who make up SCAHA and they can determine if it will work for them or not and if they do we can call the BOS66 plan.

BladesofSteel66

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • LR Justice +5/-2
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #77 on: November 23, 2019, 09:14:31 PM »
I stand by it.  Happened this year... Flyers2 are 3-3 after playing the 3 worst teams and getting wins...  include preseason they are 3-6-1 and OUT! Guess who would be in ....  Ducks2 at 5-4, but having a rough start to reg season with a 4-0 pre. 


BUT at this point, look at every division and every schedule.  Preseason and first 5 reg season games are extremely accurate.  If you are in the bottom and your season is cut, it's 99.9% because you were in the wrong division..... and shame on you.


Money and all those considerations means poo to me.  These are kids.  They play to have fun and the second you make it a money making machine you get... oh, yep, you get SCAHA and its clubs  >:( :'( :-\

BladesofSteel66

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • LR Justice +5/-2
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #78 on: November 23, 2019, 09:34:33 PM »
OH SNAP!  There were two Saturday games.  Any results?!?!  Sugarrush win by 10 again?
« Last Edit: November 23, 2019, 09:44:01 PM by BladesofSteel66 »

Slapper

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • LR Justice +1/-1
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #79 on: November 24, 2019, 03:52:25 PM »
Congrats to the Wave with a big win over Empire..

Maverick

  • Squirt
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • LR Justice +23/-4
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #80 on: November 25, 2019, 10:35:02 AM »
You’ve fixed it. All you have to do is give more power to a benevolent centralized organization that has a track record for making all of the right decisions on implementation.


So, not SCAHA, got it. 


I have been proposing this balance for years.  Allowing clubs to choose needs accountability.  Stop guaranteeing the 20 games!  Maybe, if you play in the wrong division, as in the 21 teams in PW A, at the 10 game mark (5 pre/5 reg) which is usually around End of November, IF YOUR TEAM IS NOT IN THE TOP 16, YOUR SEASON IS OVER!  GOODBYE!  ... and players are not allowed to join other teams as it is after the final roster date in December.


That'll show 'em.


Stupidest thing i've ever read on this board...  Good luck with your utopia at the A level, let alone any so cal youth hockey level.  you claim to have been around for years, yet just figured out that every division every season has disparity top to bottom.  hopefully your at the top and can suffer through the blowouts and your kid doesn't lose out on too much development in the process... ;) [size=78%] [/size]

BladesofSteel66

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • LR Justice +5/-2
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #81 on: November 25, 2019, 12:00:44 PM »
GOBBLE-GOBBLE-GOBBLE!!!
Turkey Tourney Time! 


Good luck to the teams playing down in Tournys!  Win that banner!!!


Huge shake up in power rankings after the break!

trans4761

  • AHL
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • LR Justice +276/-228
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #82 on: December 02, 2019, 01:58:30 PM »
So what's up with the "power rankings "

BladesofSteel66

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • LR Justice +5/-2
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #83 on: December 02, 2019, 02:07:27 PM »
So what's up with the "power rankings "


Busy Tourney week!  Back at the grind sucks.  Hope to have time tomorrow to post!

AlexJ312

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • LR Justice +0/-0
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #84 on: December 02, 2019, 08:27:17 PM »
Congratulations to Empire Hockey Club 12U A for bringing home the championship banner from Las Vegas!!!!
« Last Edit: December 03, 2019, 06:08:42 AM by AlexJ312 »

BladesofSteel66

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • LR Justice +5/-2
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #85 on: December 04, 2019, 09:32:29 AM »
Tourney season was all over the place.  Top "A" teams were playing in "AA" tournaments, some were in LA, Ana, Vegas, SD...  truly all over.  Some won banners, others were complete flops. 


I see some confusing results when researching this weeks rankings. 


SDIA, Condors, JD4, and Bears played in "AA" in LA, but the "A" division, was filled with random teams.  Classic LA douschebaggery... named the divisions "A" - "AA" - and "AA" Elite instead of "B" - "A" - "AA" ...total garbage.


Goldrush, ID, JD2, and Wave1 played in Ana 12A and GR made easy work winning a banner (was the Wave1 roster missing players - they were terrible after their big upset of EHC?)


EHC, Flyers2, and JD3 went to Vegas and EHC won that banner. 


Lastly, the tourney in SD was filled with some of the worst PW teams in SCAHA.  What a MESS!!!  ...with that in mind, here is the


NEW POWER RANKINGS and MHR#


1. Goldrush  131
2. EHC  184
3. Condors  192
4. Wave1  221
5. Kings2  217
6. Guls2  405
7. SDIA  369
8. JD4  435
9. JD3  378
10. Bears 436


Bottom 5 coming soon!!!
« Last Edit: December 04, 2019, 09:42:47 AM by BladesofSteel66 »

Siggiz

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • LR Justice +0/-0
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #86 on: December 04, 2019, 10:07:05 AM »
Tourney season was all over the place.  Top "A" teams were playing in "AA" tournaments, some were in LA, Ana, Vegas, SD...  truly all over.  Some won banners, others were complete flops. 


I see some confusing results when researching this weeks rankings. 


SDIA, Condors, JD4, and Bears played in "AA" in LA, but the "A" division, was filled with random teams.  Classic LA douschebaggery... named the divisions "A" - "AA" - and "AA" Elite instead of "B" - "A" - "AA" ...total garbage.


Goldrush, ID, JD2, and Wave1 played in Ana 12A and GR made easy work winning a banner (was the Wave1 roster missing players - they were terrible after their big upset of EHC?)


EHC, Flyers2, and JD3 went to Vegas and EHC won that banner. 


Lastly, the tourney in SD was filled with some of the worst PW teams in SCAHA.  What a MESS!!!  ...with that in mind, here is the


NEW POWER RANKINGS and MHR#


1. Goldrush  131
2. EHC  184
3. Condors  192
4. Wave1  221
5. Kings2  217
6. Guls2  405
7. SDIA  369
8. JD4  435
9. JD3  378
10. Bears 436


Bottom 5 coming soon!!!




Wave1  won Banner in San Jose Silver Sticks. Wave 2 was in Anaheim

BladesofSteel66

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • LR Justice +5/-2
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #87 on: December 04, 2019, 10:36:55 AM »
I knew something was wrong on MHR.  Wow.  That is a huge blunder.  They posted the results from Ana for Wave1 and not Wave2. 


I looked at the rosters and thought that was the case.  UGH!  I once said MHR is a great system and mistakes are easily fixed.  Hope they fix that soon. 


I might need to redo the rankings next week FOR SURE!!!!  Thanks for the clarification.

BladesofSteel66

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • LR Justice +5/-2
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #88 on: December 04, 2019, 12:22:32 PM »
I just looked it up...


Silver Sticks SJ was only an "A" tourney.  It was filled with the worst/bottom half teams in NorCal.  I give no street cred for that banner.
EHC beat Vaca Jets in Vegas 8-1.  Jets are in 3rd NorCal.  How bad are those teams?  The best 3 NorCal "A" teams were not even there.  Gives the Silver Sticks tourney a bad name IMO. 

The only good NorCal "A" team is the Blackhawks and they DROPPED from AA.  NorCal Hockey is still a joke. 

I stand by this weeks POWER RANKINGS!
« Last Edit: December 04, 2019, 12:36:23 PM by BladesofSteel66 »

trans4761

  • AHL
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • LR Justice +276/-228
Re: Pee Wee A 19-20
« Reply #89 on: December 04, 2019, 02:18:33 PM »
Maybe you should do a strength of schedule analysis and records vs your power ranked teams.