This Community is For Sale - For more information contact: admin@calhockey.com

Author Topic: Bantam AA 16/17  (Read 158469 times)

Teemu8

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
  • LR Justice +32/-18
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #135 on: September 19, 2016, 09:55:34 AM »
A little birdie told me that they would not be eligible for playoffs at AA but they would be for A....

Handboni

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
  • LR Justice +9/-15
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #136 on: September 19, 2016, 10:02:21 AM »
Are the relegated Wave players eligible to leave and go play AA for other teams?  Would think several might consider that if it is an option.  Different than last year's Riptide PWA team that wanted to play AA, but the club didn't have enough teams at the various levels to meet the criteria.  That team was allowed to compete for the state championship and won it all.  Will be interesting to see if the Wave team is eligible for playoffs.  They can certainly play AA tournaments and I'm sure will be looking for games with AA teams throughout the season. 

Pistonkev

  • AHL
  • *****
  • Posts: 648
  • LR Justice +157/-30
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #137 on: September 20, 2016, 07:15:40 AM »
Some of the schedule is out looks like the first 6 weeks.

Detroit Hockey Life

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • LR Justice +27/-5
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #138 on: September 20, 2016, 08:47:01 AM »
Yep, Looks like CAHA is 10/16-17.


Puck Yeah

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
  • LR Justice +110/-51
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #139 on: September 20, 2016, 08:56:33 AM »
Are the relegated Wave players eligible to leave and go play AA for other teams?  Would think several might consider that if it is an option.  Different than last year's Riptide PWA team that wanted to play AA, but the club didn't have enough teams at the various levels to meet the criteria.  That team was allowed to compete for the state championship and won it all.  Will be interesting to see if the Wave team is eligible for playoffs.  They can certainly play AA tournaments and I'm sure will be looking for games with AA teams throughout the season.

The Wave has an AA BTN team.  Oddly enough they are listed as Wave (1).  Is the A team being denied an opportunity to play AA because the Wave must have an A team for eligibility for AA team?  If so, being relegated to be a place holder for another team is a disservice.  I think the rules need some reconsideration if that is the case.

Detroit Hockey Life

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • LR Justice +27/-5
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #140 on: September 20, 2016, 10:02:14 AM »
I heard it was PDR

Pistonkev

  • AHL
  • *****
  • Posts: 648
  • LR Justice +157/-30
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #141 on: September 20, 2016, 10:19:59 AM »
I heard it was PDR

Yes it's PDR they won't move them. The must do what Riptide did last year now. Win state.

Detroit Hockey Life

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • LR Justice +27/-5
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #142 on: September 20, 2016, 10:29:15 AM »
Nothing new I guess. When we were b/a it always seemed there were teams playing to low.


Handboni

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
  • LR Justice +9/-15
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #143 on: September 20, 2016, 10:56:12 AM »
Agreed, they are staying put.  But if it is PDR, then shouldn't they be eligible for playoffs?

Pistonkev

  • AHL
  • *****
  • Posts: 648
  • LR Justice +157/-30
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #144 on: September 20, 2016, 12:25:09 PM »
Agreed, they are staying put.  But if it is PDR, then shouldn't they be eligible for playoffs?

In A I assume? Why wouldn't they be?

Panther Coach

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
  • LR Justice +41/-21
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #145 on: September 20, 2016, 12:25:23 PM »
I heard it was PDR


That is right and from I heard the parent's knew that was an issue when they signed. Everyone is complaining about CAHA when the rule is clear.  The Wave organization knows it and still fielded a team that didn't meet the requirements despite the first year of this new requirement allowing your 2014-2015 club to count towards the PDR.  They might be a top team in Bantam A but were not in AA.

Rats13

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
  • LR Justice +16/-2
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #146 on: September 20, 2016, 02:14:13 PM »
Agreed, they are staying put.  But if it is PDR, then shouldn't they be eligible for playoffs?

In A I assume? Why wouldn't they be?

Maybe this?:
24.02 CAHA RULE - In order to be eligible for SCAHA and CAHA playoffs,Peewee, Bantam and Midget Tier II and ‘A’ level teams must meet the CAHA player development requirements (PDR)[/font]

Handboni

  • Peewee
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
  • LR Justice +9/-15
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #147 on: September 20, 2016, 02:28:37 PM »
Nice citation!

Puck Yeah

  • Midget
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
  • LR Justice +110/-51
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #148 on: September 20, 2016, 02:31:47 PM »
Agreed, they are staying put.  But if it is PDR, then shouldn't they be eligible for playoffs?

In A I assume? Why wouldn't they be?

Maybe this?:
24.02 CAHA RULE - In order to be eligible for SCAHA and CAHA playoffs,Peewee, Bantam and Midget Tier II and ‘A’ level teams must meet the CAHA player development requirements (PDR)


So by moving up BOTH teams would become ineligible?


Detroit Hockey Life

  • Mite
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • LR Justice +27/-5
Re: Bantam AA 16/17
« Reply #149 on: September 24, 2016, 11:32:00 AM »
And they're off! The first CAHA game is in the books. Good luck everyone. Have a safe fun season!