Calhockey.com

Hockey Discussions => Squirt Hockey => Topic started by: Hockey999999 on June 12, 2016, 10:57:18 PM

Title: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockey999999 on June 12, 2016, 10:57:18 PM
How did try outs go for everybody?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on September 06, 2016, 10:26:34 PM
Most of the Squirt A teams were in the Anaheim tourney for Labor Day.  Seemed like all the teams were competitive except The Mariners.  Any teams stand out?  Where did Jr Kings play for Labor Day?  I saw Bears played against BB teams so can't judge that performance.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on September 06, 2016, 11:16:23 PM
Most of the Squirt A teams were in the Anaheim tourney for Labor Day.  Seemed like all the teams were competitive except The Mariners.  Any teams stand out?  Where did Jr Kings play for Labor Day?  I saw Bears played against BB teams so can't judge that performance.


I watched the Bears play the Jr Sharks 06 Squirt A team for the Championship, which they won and also noticed on online they beat them during pool play 6-2. I guess everyone will have a better idea after this weekend!  :-X :-X
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 07, 2016, 12:06:18 AM
Kings took the weekend off.  Going out of town later this month.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 07, 2016, 11:59:36 AM
Most of the Squirt A teams were in the Anaheim tourney for Labor Day.  Seemed like all the teams were competitive except The Mariners.  Any teams stand out?  Where did Jr Kings play for Labor Day?  I saw Bears played against BB teams so can't judge that performance.


Word on the street is that the Mariners are dropping down... which leaves only 8 teams in Squirt A... which means all the teams have made the playoffs!  So congratulations to all the teams!  :o
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on September 07, 2016, 12:26:23 PM
I did hear OCHC BB team may move up to A.  Anyone else hear that?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 07, 2016, 12:33:34 PM
It will be interesting to see who comes out on top. Looks like we have a lot of parity among the top 6 or 7 teams.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 07, 2016, 09:11:08 PM
I did hear OCHC BB team may move up to A.  Anyone else hear that?


Didn't hear that, but would be nice to have a few more teams. It certainly won't be a two horse race like last year... should know more by the end of the preseason. Ought to be tight all around, though. Kings/Artesia game this weekend should be interesting.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on September 11, 2016, 04:53:14 PM
Kings SQ A 2007 beat Artesia Wave 5-2. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 11, 2016, 07:30:45 PM
Gulls beat Ducks (Runtso) 2-0

Bears beat Ontario Wave 9-1
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 11, 2016, 07:41:29 PM
Also...

Ducks (EK) beat Mariners 11-2.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: CH24 on September 11, 2016, 08:23:00 PM
Interesting sqa hockey ...... Good luck 06' should be a dominate year
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on September 12, 2016, 09:26:18 PM
Anyone see the Kings/Artesia Wave game?  Are the Kings that strong or did the Wave have an off game.  Thought it would have been a bit closer game.

Also, surprised Ice Dogs only won by 2 against the Ontario Wave.  Ice Dogs are starting off slow it seems, they have some firepower but not scoring much yet.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 13, 2016, 11:39:15 AM
Didnt see the game, but the Kings are fast and skilled and deep. Going to be a handful for everyone all year.


Agree on the Ice Dogs. Despite winning the Anaheim Memorial Day tournament, they seemed to struggle a bit over Labor Day tournament. It's still very early, though. They'll get it going. Lots of talent.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: BBelieber on September 13, 2016, 01:17:47 PM
Also, surprised Ice Dogs only won by 2 against the Ontario Wave.  Ice Dogs are starting off slow it seems, they have some firepower but not scoring much yet.


Final of Ice Dogs game was 12-0, 13-0, something like that.  SCAHA site is not correct, or not yet updated to reflect final score. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on September 13, 2016, 02:47:29 PM
That score is more like what I expected.  Thanks for the info.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 13, 2016, 05:11:02 PM
Yeah, that definitely makes more sense. It was listed funny (marked as "in progress") 


Is the SCAHA site usually this slow to post scores?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on September 13, 2016, 10:06:09 PM
Yeah, that definitely makes more sense. It was listed funny (marked as "in progress") 


Is the SCAHA site usually this slow to post scores?

Could be some new managers just a bit slow uploading scores. Lol!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: GameByNumbers on September 14, 2016, 12:48:46 PM
Initial Rankings based on Labor Day and 1st Pre-Season *


* Jr Kings - based on 1 game only, did not play Labor Day.


(https://s15.postimg.org/hyo4rdda3/Rankings_9_18_16.jpg)


(https://s11.postimg.org/6rp4gbb9v/pick_9_18_16.jpg)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 14, 2016, 04:20:51 PM
Initial Rankings based on Labor Day and 1st Pre-Season *


* Jr Kings - based on 1 game only, did not play Labor Day.


(https://s15.postimg.org/hyo4rdda3/Rankings_9_18_16.jpg)


(https://s11.postimg.org/6rp4gbb9v/pick_9_18_16.jpg)


I think the Gulls will finish higher than that, if they are returning their full BB team from last year.




Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 16, 2016, 09:01:36 PM
Won't learn much from the Gulls game this weekend (Mariners having a rough time), but all the other games should be good. I tend to think everyone is going to have their hands full with the Kings.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockey999999 on September 18, 2016, 08:14:07 PM
Kings beat Ducks, 4-3.  It was closer than I thought it would be and really could have gone either way. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 18, 2016, 08:57:11 PM
Artesia beat Bears 5-2. Wave looked fast and aggressive, even with short bench. Bears got outworked. Haven't heard about any other games.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on September 18, 2016, 10:09:10 PM
Kings and Ducks was a solid game.  Very physical with both teams getting a number of penalties.  There really wasn't any flow to the game and both teams really couldn't organize the way they wanted.  I'll be interested in seeing how this match up develops over the season.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 19, 2016, 03:36:58 PM
Ducks (EK) beat Ice Dogs 2-1


Gulls beat Mariners 11-1


Some pretty tight scores across the board, with the exception of the Gulls game. I'd say Kings are top dog right now... but it's a loooooong season.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on September 19, 2016, 09:43:28 PM
Ducks (EK) beat Ice Dogs 2-1


Gulls beat Mariners 11-1


Some pretty tight scores across the board, with the exception of the Gulls game. I'd say Kings are top dog right now... but it's a loooooong season.


would be interesting to know how you came up with "Kings are top dog right now" with 2 games into the PRE-season.  Ducks (2) beat an alleged good IceDog team while your Kings gave up 3 to a Ducks (1) team that went scoreless against the Gulls a week ago.  Yes, it's a "loooooong season" but that's why the kids play the game... nuffsed.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 19, 2016, 11:01:03 PM
Well, they beat a good Ducks (Runtso) team, and they beat Artesia Wave 5-2, which beat everyone else at Labor Day tournament. Not to mention, the Kings have been together for more than a year, so they're clicking right now. Doesn't mean that'll be the same story come March, but until someone beats them, they seem like the team to beat. They're not "my" Kings... I'm simply observing, and they seem tough right now.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 19, 2016, 11:03:09 PM
Ducks (EK) beat Ice Dogs 2-1


Gulls beat Mariners 11-1


Some pretty tight scores across the board, with the exception of the Gulls game. I'd say Kings are top dog right now... but it's a loooooong season.


would be interesting to know how you came up with "Kings are top dog right now" with 2 games into the PRE-season.  Ducks (2) beat an alleged good IceDog team while your Kings gave up 3 to a Ducks (1) team that went scoreless against the Gulls a week ago.  Yes, it's a "loooooong season" but that's why the kids play the game... nuffsed.


And then who do you like right now?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on September 20, 2016, 01:18:49 AM
i'll go out on a limb and agree with whom ever GameByNumbers should predict is TopDog... I heard the Kings have most, if not all players and goalie returning.  Played a few tournaments... Advantage Kings.  Someone's mentioned Gulls could finish better depending on who they have returning. Both Ducks teams looked good in LaborDay, BUT still too early to say.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 20, 2016, 08:18:52 AM
i'll go out on a limb and agree with whom ever GameByNumbers should predict is TopDog... I heard the Kings have most, if not all players and goalie returning.  Played a few tournaments... Advantage Kings.  Someone's mentioned Gulls could finish better depending on who they have returning. Both Ducks teams looked good in LaborDay, BUT still too early to say.


It's not too early to say at all... in fact, the point of this forum is "to say."  The opinions will likely change each week, but that is my opinion of the moment.  GameByNumbers will change quite a bit this week... with the Bears and Ice Dogs moving down and Artesia moving up, which is the same Artesia team that beat Ducks (EK) and Ice Dogs in tournament... but lost to Kings last week 5-2 (which is partially why I thought Kings were tops right now).  The Gulls consist of BB/B players from last year, and perhaps some new kids from neighboring programs.  Their wins thus far have been deceiving... they beat Ducks (Runtso) in close game, a quality win, but they also beat Ontario (dropping down), Mariners (dropping down), and Artesia BB.  They lost to Nevada, which won the tournament.  If only 7 teams remain in SQA when the season starts, it'll be a slugfest all year with teams rising and falling depending on how they develop. Who is clicking now might not be clicking in March. For example, look at the Ducks (EK) last year. They breezed through the season and playoffs... and then lost in the CAHA championship game to a team they beat soundly days before.  These are 9/10-year old kids... and anything can happen.     
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 20, 2016, 09:40:14 AM
With only 7 teams I guess they're playing for the bye week in the playoffs
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 20, 2016, 03:37:58 PM
I predict the Mariners will beat the Jr Kings 1-0 next week
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on September 20, 2016, 03:57:54 PM
I thought I did "SAY"  My inquiry was how you came to the conclusion, which you answered by the insight of knowing the Kings have played together prior to this PRE season.  With playing just the ONE game, as stated when GameByNumbers created the ranking board, I wasn't sure how a Kings team could be your 'top dog' but it makes sense now that you know as much.  Advantage Kings for being together longer than most teams prior to the 2016-2017 season.  I haven't heard much from any other teams, but I guess we're on the same page.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 20, 2016, 04:14:26 PM
I predict the Mariners will beat the Jr Kings 1-0 next week


This is a trick!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on September 20, 2016, 06:43:56 PM
I predict the Mariners will beat the Jr Kings 1-0 next week


This is a trick!!!

No it's a forfeit! Seems a trend has started. I recall the same thing happening last year in squirt A. Haha!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 20, 2016, 09:57:52 PM
I predict the Mariners will beat the Jr Kings 1-0 next week


This is a trick!!!

No it's a forfeit! Seems a trend has started. I recall the same thing happening last year in squirt A. Haha!


Oh, I know... a certain team is taking a nice weekend vacation to Toronto.

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockey999999 on September 20, 2016, 10:32:03 PM
What tournament are the Kings playing in this weekend?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 21, 2016, 12:47:15 AM
Drew Doughty Invitational in London Ontario.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Puck Yeah on September 21, 2016, 07:57:04 AM
Drew Doughty Invitational in London Ontario.


Because you can't develop a Squirt team locally.  Ontario is the closest place for any real competition. Good Grief, they are 9.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Pistonkev on September 21, 2016, 08:24:38 AM
Drew Doughty Invitational in London Ontario.


Because you can't develop a Squirt team locally.  Ontario is the closest place for any real competition. Good Grief, they are 9.

Ha so true! lol ???
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Attitude is Everything on September 21, 2016, 08:25:54 AM
Drew Doughty Invitational in London Ontario.


Because you can't develop a Squirt team locally.  Ontario is the closest place for any real competition. Good Grief, they are 9.

They are getting ready to play the Jr. Gulls on the 1st.  ;D

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on September 22, 2016, 06:59:54 PM
Good luck to both JR kings teams playing in London this weekend. Showcasing California hockey and raising money for the Ronald McDonald House! 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on September 23, 2016, 02:30:33 PM
How are the Jr Kings doing in Canada?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on September 23, 2016, 10:59:34 PM
according to the tournament website... JrKings (ATOM) tied one game and won one 3-2.  the JrKings (MinorATOM) group lost both games 2-3, then 7-6.  what a great opportunity for the JrKings program and the young players to be in Canada.  hopefully they get up to Toronto for the WorldCup when it's done.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 24, 2016, 10:19:16 PM
How are the Jr Kings doing in Canada?

Squirt A went 1-3, 3 very tight one goal games and got blown out by London.   Overall great experience and great time had by all.  Bummer to lose two one goal games but they showed they can compete with some of the top teams in Canada.  Should have won both of those games but penalties were a factor in both.  We will be back next year.

Drew Doughty Invitational in London Ontario.


Because you can't develop a Squirt team locally.  Ontario is the closest place for any real competition. Good Grief, they are 9.

It's not about development, it's about seeing how you compare to top competition from other regions. In other words, about measuring the development.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: skates on September 24, 2016, 11:37:26 PM
Lol! They are 9 and 10 year olds and you want to see how they compare against other 9 and 10 years old and you have to travel to London or Canada? Really? Do they eat more Wheaties in Canada or a London? Lol! They play just like any other 9 or 10 year olds play. You can get the same competition at the next closest rink.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on September 25, 2016, 06:45:09 AM
You cannot get the same level of competition at home, hence minor aged, highly skilled teams have to play up a division.  From what I can see, the ADM model has hurt the full-ice play.  Our kids lack the positional knowledge of the Canadian players, but make-up for it in athleticism.  Overall, this was a good showing for California hockey.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 25, 2016, 07:12:54 AM
And, um, can we all get on the same page... there is also a London in Canada... just outside Toronto.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: LetsGoRangers on September 25, 2016, 03:17:31 PM
Lol! They are 9 and 10 year olds and you want to see how they compare against other 9 and 10 years old and you have to travel to London or Canada? Really? Do they eat more Wheaties in Canada or a London? Lol! They play just like any other 9 or 10 year olds play. You can get the same competition at the next closest rink.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjy_7haflaM
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Puck Yeah on September 25, 2016, 04:57:42 PM
How are the Jr Kings doing in Canada?

Squirt A went 1-3, 3 very tight one goal games and got blown out by London.   Overall great experience and great time had by all.  Bummer to lose two one goal games but they showed they can compete with some of the top teams in Canada.  Should have won both of those games but penalties were a factor in both.  We will be back next year.

Drew Doughty Invitational in London Ontario.


Because you can't develop a Squirt team locally.  Ontario is the closest place for any real competition. Good Grief, they are 9.

It's not about development, it's about seeing how you compare to top competition from other regions. In other words, about measuring the development.


Then I guess since they were one goal games and the Canadian 9 year olds are heads and shoulders above SoCal 9 year olds we will be expecting an undefeated season before hoisting the cup come springtime.  I am booking a room for the finals now before all the scouts take them. ;)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 26, 2016, 01:53:16 AM
Lol! They are 9 and 10 year olds and you want to see how they compare against other 9 and 10 years old and you have to travel to London or Canada? Really? Do they eat more Wheaties in Canada or a London? Lol! They play just like any other 9 or 10 year olds play. You can get the same competition at the next closest rink.


Our team is 9 yr olds playing against mostly 10 yr olds in scaha.  We travel to see how we do against 9 yr olds from traditional hockey markets to see where we are developmmentally.  Not sure what is so hard to understand about that. SoCal birth year teams have been doing that for years. There were teams from Pittsbugh, Long Island, and Syracuse there as well Plus the kids have a blast and it builds team unity. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Puck Yeah on September 26, 2016, 07:58:13 AM
Lol! They are 9 and 10 year olds and you want to see how they compare against other 9 and 10 years old and you have to travel to London or Canada? Really? Do they eat more Wheaties in Canada or a London? Lol! They play just like any other 9 or 10 year olds play. You can get the same competition at the next closest rink.


Our team is 9 yr olds playing against mostly 10 yr olds in scaha.  We travel to see how we do against 9 yr olds from traditional hockey markets to see where we are developmmentally.  Not sure what is so hard to understand about that. SoCal birth year teams have been doing that for years. There were teams from Pittsbugh, Long Island, and Syracuse there as well Plus the kids have a blast and it builds team unity.

I think the only difficult part to understand is why some think it matters how they stack up against 9 year olds 1500 miles away.  There is nothing so profound in Squirts Canada that it can't be found here. 

To each his own.  It is your money, spend it as you wish.  It is not my place to tell you how to expose your player to hockey.  However, I do have my own opinion on the importance of 9 year olds getting on a plane to play a hockey game.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: JustPlay on September 26, 2016, 08:27:59 AM
Agree.  It's six of one, half dozen of the other traveling to the East Coast vs. Canada as far as cost (maybe even cheaper if you factor in the currency exchange rate).

Great experience, great hockey, some families caught a few World Cup games - sounds fun to me.  The fact it was hosted by Drew Doughty and the London Jr. Knights in partnership with the LA Kings seems logical that the Jr. Kings were a part of it.

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kangaroo Jack on September 26, 2016, 08:53:10 AM
Do not forget Bailey the Lion was there as well. :-*
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: trans4761 on September 26, 2016, 09:03:51 AM
Do not forget Bailey the Lion was there as well. :-*
That dude owes me $$ too  !!

If doing this tournament is to see how you "stack" up against other 9 year olds. Its like measuring up your pinga against your 9 year old buddies when you were a kid..  It doesn't matter until much later in life. Then it matters. ;)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockey999999 on September 26, 2016, 09:18:46 AM
I think it's about 2 things; the travel experience which is fun and good team bonding and it's about ego ("we played a tournament in Canada so we are good").  You want local competition from 9 year olds I hear Gasseaus 2007 BB team is really good.  They haven't lost a game this season (won all by 7-8 goals) and have won every tournament they have been in over the last year.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on September 26, 2016, 09:57:43 AM
Rumor has it, there is a pretty good 06 team down the road that was nationally ranked last year. I'm sure they could have provided a pretty good measuring stick? But hey, I agree, the fun memories are what the kids will remember. All the other stuff is for the parents and club.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 26, 2016, 11:16:06 AM
I think it's about 2 things; the travel experience which is fun and good team bonding and it's about ego ("we played a tournament in Canada so we are good").  You want local competition from 9 year olds I hear Gasseaus 2007 BB team is really good.  They haven't lost a game this season (won all by 7-8 goals) and have won every tournament they have been in over the last year.


That Ducks BB team looks pretty good but they have played mostly bottom half teams.  They only beat the Kings 07 bb by 1 (not 7 or 8.  If they are so good why didn't they go squirt A instead of BB?

Rumor has it, there is a pretty good 06 team down the road that was nationally ranked last year. I'm sure they could have provided a pretty good measuring stick? But hey, I agree, the fun memories are what the kids will remember. All the other stuff is for the parents and club.


An 07 team against a top ranked 06 team?  That would be an embarrassment for both teams.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on September 26, 2016, 11:20:15 AM
I think it's about 2 things; the travel experience which is fun and good team bonding and it's about ego ("we played a tournament in Canada so we are good").  You want local competition from 9 year olds I hear Gasseaus 2007 BB team is really good.  They haven't lost a game this season (won all by 7-8 goals) and have won every tournament they have been in over the last year.


That Ducks BB team looks pretty good but they have played mostly bottom half teams.  They only beat the Kings 07 bb by 1 (not 7 or 8.  If they are so good why didn't they go squirt A instead of BB?

Rumor has it, there is a pretty good 06 team down the road that was nationally ranked last year. I'm sure they could have provided a pretty good measuring stick? But hey, I agree, the fun memories are what the kids will remember. All the other stuff is for the parents and club.


An 07 team against a top ranked 06 team?  That would be an embarrassment for both teams.
Sorry was referring to the 06 team not the 07 team.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 26, 2016, 11:30:57 AM
The catalyst for this whole trip was the NHL Kings stroking a fat check for a 3 year sponsorship of the Drew Doughty tournament to benefit Ronald McDonald House , and in return the Jr Kings get a spot in the Atom and Minor Atom divisions.  So the 07's and 08's will most likely go next year and the 08's and 09's the year after.  It was a first class event and a first class experience.  Beats going to KHS or Lakewood on a Sunday morning, even if the competition is good (it is).  Sorry but it's the truth.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 26, 2016, 11:36:58 AM
Sorry was referring to the 06 team not the 07 team.


The 06 Ducks team that went to Buffalo last year when they were 9?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on September 26, 2016, 11:43:38 AM
Sorry was referring to the 06 team not the 07 team.


The 06 Ducks team that went to Buffalo last year when they were 9?


Not arguing that, however to your point of playing the best and measuring etc... Their were no strong 06 teams for them to play locally. All I said was if the point was to go to canada to play against top 06 teams, one of the best is right down the road. Aside from the experience and all that, which I get. I'm just addressing that...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kangaroo Jack on September 26, 2016, 11:47:41 AM
 http://youtu.be/f-PWJmvvZ_M.  This is why they went
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on September 26, 2016, 11:48:13 AM
The catalyst for this whole trip was the NHL Kings stroking a fat check for a 3 year sponsorship of the Drew Doughty tournament to benefit Ronald McDonald House , and in return the Jr Kings get a spot in the Atom and Minor Atom divisions.  So the 07's and 08's will most likely go next year and the 08's and 09's the year after.  It was a first class event and a first class experience.  Beats going to KHS or Lakewood on a Sunday morning, even if the competition is good (it is).  Sorry but it's the truth.


HAHA! Now that.. I can understand a bit more.. Just was getting lost in the measuring stick talk. Glad you all had fun!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: trans4761 on September 26, 2016, 12:15:30 PM
 :-
http://youtu.be/f-PWJmvvZ_M.  This is why they went
,  :-X :-X :-X
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: SilkyMitts on September 26, 2016, 03:26:41 PM
Enough already!!  Just let these kids play hockey.  We are in preseason and everyone is talking about no competition locally.  Every week, each team is going to get better and the Squirt A division will be highly competitive.  Let these super Jr. Kings run the table on all the others teams and then let's talk.  I doubt that is going to happen.  But for God's sake these kids are 9 and 10 years old, let them play and have fun.   
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 26, 2016, 09:05:23 PM
Enough already!!  Just let these kids play hockey.  We are in preseason and everyone is talking about no competition locally.  Every week, each team is going to get better and the Squirt A division will be highly competitive.  Let these super Jr. Kings run the table on all the others teams and then let's talk.  I doubt that is going to happen.  But for God's sake these kids are 9 and 10 years old, let them play and have fun.


No one said there is no competition locally, just that they wanted to see how the kids do against competition from other regions.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on September 26, 2016, 10:49:08 PM
I applaud the JrKings' parents that decided to allow their hockey players to experience the travel and all Canada had to offer.  Yes, these kids are only 9 years old, but SO WHAT?  I won't begin to advise any parent what to do with their money and how to develop their young athletes.  I'm sure we all want the BEST for our kids. Whether it be local or a thousand miles away... if I think it will benefit the team and there's an agreement from EVERY parent TO attend a tournament far away, then so be it. 
I'd suggest other Members SHOULD voice their support because as other California clubs send their teams abroad and represent SoCal hockey... with their success, the rest of us could benefit as the world may want to travel to our local tournaments to compete and measure up against our players.  AND... you didn't have to spend a dime for the clubs that DO go thousands of miles.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Handboni on September 27, 2016, 09:28:43 AM
Well said, although other than western teams, top teams from other regions don't come to California, unless it's for a national championship or NHL Cup.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: trans4761 on September 27, 2016, 09:58:05 AM
I applaud the JrKings' parents that decided to allow their hockey players to experience the travel and all Canada had to offer.  Yes, these kids are only 9 years old, but SO WHAT?  I won't begin to advise any parent what to do with their money and how to develop their young athletes.  I'm sure we all want the BEST for our kids. Whether it be local or a thousand miles away... if I think it will benefit the team and there's an agreement from EVERY parent TO attend a tournament far away, then so be it. 
I'd suggest other Members SHOULD voice their support because as other California clubs send their teams abroad and represent SoCal hockey... with their success, the rest of us could benefit as the world may want to travel to our local tournaments to compete and measure up against our players.  AND... you didn't have to spend a dime for the clubs that DO go thousands of miles.
Spoken like a true KOOL-AID drinker. 
When you've been hearing for the last 2 to 3 years that your 07s are AAA super elite.(remember B.O.) You start to believe it.  The argument of advancing So Cal hockey to the rest of the country does not hold water if you win only 1 game (unless your BF)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on September 27, 2016, 01:03:35 PM
Predictions and rankings based on Tournaments and Preseason (Kings limited games make them hard to gauge).

1      Jr Ducks (2)
2      Jr Gulls
3      Ice Dogs (1)
4      Jr. Kings
5      Wave-Art (1)
6      Bears
7      Jr Ducks (1)
8      Wave-Ont (2)
9      Mariners

Next weekends games:
Jr Gulls v. Jr. Kings                     Gulls by 1
Bears v. Ice Dogs (1)                  Ice Dogs by 2
Jr Ducks (2) v. Wave-Ont (2)       Jr Ducks by 6
Wave-Art (1) v. Mariners             Wave (Art) by 6
Jr Ducks (2) v. Jr Ducks (1)         Jr Ducks (EK) by 2
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on September 27, 2016, 01:56:35 PM



Who's giving the 'AAA super elite' speech? I'd like to hear it for myself and make my own judgement.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on September 27, 2016, 02:13:21 PM
no idea KOOL AID was so bad for you... however, Canada is currently the BEST nation when it comes to hockey.  you're correct, that no one will search GOOGLE for hockey tournaments when a California team wins ONE game, but... the JrKings ATOM team got 2 Wins and tied 2.  If more SoCal teams could afford to play in Canada and maybe win more than ONE game... why wouldn't teams outside the U.S want to measure their kids up against California teams.  Yes, it's a long shot... but I haven't read or heard of any other post on this board.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on September 27, 2016, 02:29:06 PM
no idea KOOL AID was so bad for you... however, Canada is currently the BEST nation when it comes to hockey.  you're correct, that no one will search GOOGLE for hockey tournaments when a California team wins ONE game, but... the JrKings ATOM team got 2 Wins and tied 2.  If more SoCal teams could afford to play in Canada and maybe win more than ONE game... why wouldn't teams outside the U.S want to measure their kids up against California teams.  Yes, it's a long shot... but I haven't read or heard of any other post on this board.

I can tell you that the Minor Atom team earned a ton of respect.  We played in the most difficult division, narrowly losing two games even though we had the run of play.  Most of the parents I spoke to thought we looked fantastic.  In fact, I was told that people would rank us as high as fifth within the tournament based on who we played and goal differential.  We may not get the Eastern Canadian teams coming west, but Vancouver sends teams to the Carmen Starr every year.  It is naive to think we didn't garner respect or deserve to play there.  It's exactly that type of thinking that doesn't allow kids to see what is possible.  Let them set their own athletic limits without you defining it for them. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 27, 2016, 03:03:18 PM
no idea KOOL AID was so bad for you... however, Canada is currently the BEST nation when it comes to hockey.  you're correct, that no one will search GOOGLE for hockey tournaments when a California team wins ONE game, but... the JrKings ATOM team got 2 Wins and tied 2.  If more SoCal teams could afford to play in Canada and maybe win more than ONE game... why wouldn't teams outside the U.S want to measure their kids up against California teams.  Yes, it's a long shot... but I haven't read or heard of any other post on this board.


If I'm not mistaken... doesn't the JrKings Atom team have 06s and 05s?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: trans4761 on September 27, 2016, 03:23:59 PM
no idea KOOL AID was so bad for you... however, Canada is currently the BEST nation when it comes to hockey.  you're correct, that no one will search GOOGLE for hockey tournaments when a California team wins ONE game, but... the JrKings ATOM team got 2 Wins and tied 2.  If more SoCal teams could afford to play in Canada and maybe win more than ONE game... why wouldn't teams outside the U.S want to measure their kids up against California teams.  Yes, it's a long shot... but I haven't read or heard of any other post on this board.
Are you by any chance  from the seed of Jim Jones ??
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on September 27, 2016, 03:41:31 PM
Tranny4761 : are you referring to the rap artist or the cult leader?


Just Saying : couldn't say whether the Atom team recruited 06 and 05 kids to play in that tournament, but my understanding is that the SquirtA team the JrKings have been playing all off season with were a TRUE 2007 team.


Disco Dan :  My apologies if offended you by not mentioning the accomplishments of the MINOR ATOM group that went to the tournament. Good for you that you have inside intel on what was said on how the JrKings performed, but I was only trying to VOICE my support for the families that did go and hope that with the success of the JrKings... it would attract more teams outside the U.S to come play locally.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on September 27, 2016, 03:59:53 PM
No worries Nuffsaid, I was making a general comment and didnt take umbrage with what you said.  The Squirt A team (in Canada as Minor Atom) is an all 2007 team.  There were certainly parents that stated their interest is coming out for a tournament.  The biggest issue there is that they do not need to travel due to the level of birthyear aged competition.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 27, 2016, 04:41:54 PM
Carmen Starr is a terrific tournament. Everyone knows that. And the benefit of coming to a tournament in SoCal... is that you're in SoCal.  Who wouldn't want to do that?  Same thing with going to Toronto or whatever. If you have the money and time, what's the problem? To clarify, though, someone was saying that the Atom team did better than the Minor Atom team... but I was pointing out that the Atom team has a majority '05s, making them PeeWees.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on September 27, 2016, 06:06:19 PM
Jr. Ducks 2 ranked 1st??? Cmon man?  What are you smoking?  Blowing out the worst team in the league twice is not grounds for a good team. I'd put the Ducks 1 ahead of them and my kid doesn't play for the ducks. Sounds like we have some dillusional folks on this site. Then again, makes for fun banter.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on September 28, 2016, 10:16:35 AM
Jr. Ducks 2 ranked 1st??? Cmon man?  What are you smoking?  Blowing out the worst team in the league twice is not grounds for a good team. I'd put the Ducks 1 ahead of them and my kid doesn't play for the ducks. Sounds like we have some dillusional folks on this site. Then again, makes for fun banter.

Jr Ducks 2 beat Bears, Ice Dogs twice and tied Wave Artesia in Labor Day tourney.  They also only lost once and that was when they played their back-up goalie for the entire game against Wave Artesia.  I stand behind my rankings...for now.  It is still early but my rankings were based on what I have seen so far.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on September 28, 2016, 04:39:28 PM
You must be on that team and I'm assuming this is your oldest child?  The Bears Bb team was ridiculously bad last year. Now they are a. The ice dogs have not shown that they are even close to last years caliber. The time that the ducks 2 tied the wave they were plying on the Westminster baby rink. Makes a huge difference. Oh, and I believe it was the wave that went on to the championship in Anaheim. It amazes me every year the koolaid shared among teams. Will be fun to read these posts after a few games.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on September 28, 2016, 05:56:14 PM
You must be on that team and I'm assuming this is your oldest child?  The Bears Bb team was ridiculously bad last year. Now they are a. The ice dogs have not shown that they are even close to last years caliber. The time that the ducks 2 tied the wave they were plying on the Westminster baby rink. Makes a huge difference. Oh, and I believe it was the wave that went on to the championship in Anaheim. It amazes me every year the koolaid shared among teams. Will be fun to read these posts after a few games.


there it is again, the talk of KoolAid.  does the size of the rink really matter at the Squirt level?  cause if so, shouldn't we as parents who pay the ice time ask to have same size rinks?  yes, it's a silly request, but so is the excuse that a game ended in a tie because they were playing on a baby rink.  'you win some, you lose some' but on the baby rink, you may end in a tie. really???
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on September 28, 2016, 06:46:13 PM
You must be on that team and I'm assuming this is your oldest child?  The Bears Bb team was ridiculously bad last year. Now they are a. The ice dogs have not shown that they are even close to last years caliber. The time that the ducks 2 tied the wave they were plying on the Westminster baby rink. Makes a huge difference. Oh, and I believe it was the wave that went on to the championship in Anaheim. It amazes me every year the koolaid shared among teams. Will be fun to read these posts after a few games.

So let me guess, you think Kings are top dog  :P

Let's hear who you like.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on September 29, 2016, 02:52:57 PM
You must be on that team and I'm assuming this is your oldest child?  The Bears Bb team was ridiculously bad last year. Now they are a. The ice dogs have not shown that they are even close to last years caliber. The time that the ducks 2 tied the wave they were plying on the Westminster baby rink. Makes a huge difference. Oh, and I believe it was the wave that went on to the championship in Anaheim. It amazes me every year the koolaid shared among teams. Will be fun to read these posts after a few games.

So let me guess, you think Kings are top dog  :P

Let's hear who you like.

Kings are tops right now. They've been together a long time... and they added several good kids in the off-season. Every other team is a mix of new kids still figuring each other out. Even the Ducks (EK) are new to each other, with two of their best players being new. Like I've said before, it'll all change as the season progresses. But for now, you'll see in two games when the Kings remain undefeated through preseason. But Artesia (with several Ice Dogs coming over), Ducks (EK), Ducks (Runtso... new kids as well), Gulls, Ice Dogs (BB winners... and good new kids), and Bears (a new coach named Kim and only 4 players from that "ridiculously bad" BB team) doing just fine.   
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on September 29, 2016, 03:45:20 PM
You must be on that team and I'm assuming this is your oldest child?  The Bears Bb team was ridiculously bad last year. Now they are a. The ice dogs have not shown that they are even close to last years caliber. The time that the ducks 2 tied the wave they were plying on the Westminster baby rink. Makes a huge difference. Oh, and I believe it was the wave that went on to the championship in Anaheim. It amazes me every year the koolaid shared among teams. Will be fun to read these posts after a few games.

So let me guess, you think Kings are top dog  :P


Let's hear who you like.

Kings are tops right now. They've been together a long time... and they added several good kids in the off-season. Every other team is a mix of new kids still figuring each other out. Even the Ducks (EK) are new to each other, with two of their best players being new. Like I've said before, it'll all change as the season progresses. But for now, you'll see in two games when the Kings remain undefeated through preseason. But Artesia (with several Ice Dogs coming over), Ducks (EK), Ducks (Runtso... new kids as well), Gulls, Ice Dogs (BB winners... and good new kids), and Bears (a new coach named Kim and only 4 players from that "ridiculously bad" BB team) doing just fine.   


It should be a good season. Top 7 teams can all beat the other 6.  Good parity.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on September 30, 2016, 11:50:20 PM
can't wait to read the excuses for the Ducks vs. Ducks game... unless that was a typo.  2 games in one day? GODucks!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 01, 2016, 08:20:37 AM
can't wait to read the excuses for the Ducks vs. Ducks game... unless that was a typo.  2 games in one day? GODucks!

There may be many excuses after this weekend.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 2kids2teamsnomoney on October 01, 2016, 07:37:49 PM
Jr. Gulls 5 - Jr. Kings 1 - Game over   8)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 01, 2016, 08:01:14 PM
Jr. Gulls 5 - Jr. Kings 1 - Game over   8)

Whaaaaaaat?! This changes everything!!!

Gulls, get to a Canadian tournament STAT.    ::)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 01, 2016, 08:16:53 PM
Jr. Gulls 5 - Jr. Kings 1 - Game over   8)

Whaaaaaaat?! This changes everything!!!

Gulls, get to a Canadian tournament STAT.    ::)

Not sure this changes anything.  The Kings hadn't proven anything yet.  I predicted a Gulls win, if you have seen any games it is not a surprise.  Gulls are a tough team.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on October 02, 2016, 07:52:57 AM
Hey "just Saying" - not sure I understand your comment. Going to Canada for a tournament isn't about proving a team is the "top."  It's about experiences. Btw - it many cases it's cheaper to play in Canada than the US. The bonus is some "poutine" for the gravy and cheese lovers!  Seriously - Gulls are a good strong 06 team. After the first period (4 to 0) it was a pretty even.  Nice to see the little 07s working hard. Should be interesting to see the rematch. It's going to be a great year for all the squirt A teams. They are all going to get better thanks to good competition. Shows how far Cali hockey has come. I remember just a few years ago when squirt a had one or two competitive teams. The rest were gong shows!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 02, 2016, 02:31:45 PM
Hey "just Saying" - not sure I understand your comment. Going to Canada for a tournament isn't about proving a team is the "top."  It's about experiences. Btw - it many cases it's cheaper to play in Canada than the US. The bonus is some "poutine" for the gravy and cheese lovers!  Seriously - Gulls are a good strong 06 team. After the first period (4 to 0) it was a pretty even.  Nice to see the little 07s working hard. Should be interesting to see the rematch. It's going to be a great year for all the squirt A teams. They are all going to get better thanks to good competition. Shows how far Cali hockey has come. I remember just a few years ago when squirt a had one or two competitive teams. The rest were gong shows!

I was just teasing. I'd love to go to Canada. Bet it was fun. Gulls are obviously rough. Should make for a good rematch now that you know what to expect.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 02, 2016, 06:26:36 PM
Ducks Runtso 7 - Ducks EK 4
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on October 03, 2016, 06:32:25 AM
Anyone at the Ducks vs Ducks game? 

Heard there was some coaches who lost their cools and it was not EK.  Eye witnesses, please?

https://youtu.be/olbN8XM_nAU
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockey999999 on October 03, 2016, 11:30:04 AM
Anyone at the Ducks vs Ducks game? 

Heard there was some coaches who lost their cools and it was not EK.  Eye witnesses, please?

https://youtu.be/olbN8XM_nAU

A few times kids on Runtso Ducks were on the ice in pain and the refs did not blow the whistle, let them play because EK Ducks had possession.  Both times Runtso Ducks coaches were going ballistic, one time a coach threw a clipboard onto the ice to get the refs attention, not near any kids and the coach got a bench minor, and the other time a coach was trying to run onto the ice but ref did not let him.

It was an odd game, the EK Ducks were on the powerplay most of the third period and had 2 5-on-3s.  Also EK Ducks pulled their goalie several times in the third period (with more than 8 minutes left).  Ducks Runtso scored one empty net goal, EK Ducks got one goal while the goalie was pulled.

It was certainly an entertaining game.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on October 03, 2016, 12:11:08 PM
Thank you Hockey 999999.

Referee related?  Figured as much..  Minor penalty for throwing clipboard on ice sounds like incompetence at its finest!

Agreed that Squirt A should be entertaining all year. 

Just hope the officials are competent enough to let the athletes compete, coaches coach (from their designated bench) & parents cheer from the bleachers.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 03, 2016, 12:41:29 PM
Looks like Mariners have officially dropped to BB. That leaves 8.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Attitude is Everything on October 04, 2016, 09:27:07 AM
Looks like Mariners have officially dropped to BB. That leaves 8.

Does that mean we all make the play-downs  ;D
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: trans4761 on October 04, 2016, 09:43:07 AM
Looks like Mariners have officially dropped to BB. That leaves 8.

Does that mean we all make the play-downs  ;D
Spoken like a true JK parent thinking their SQ A. li'l Gretzky is playing Tier.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: area51 on October 04, 2016, 09:50:20 AM
Looks like Mariners have officially dropped to BB. That leaves 8.

Does that mean we all make the play-downs  ;D
Spoken like a true JK parent thinking their SQ A. li'l Gretzky is playing Tier.
lol!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Attitude is Everything on October 05, 2016, 08:21:39 AM
Looks like Mariners have officially dropped to BB. That leaves 8.

Does that mean we all make the play-downs  ;D
Spoken like a true JK parent thinking their SQ A. li'l Gretzky is playing Tier.

Ha, ha, ha. :-) but I'm not with the JK  :o   I was being funny.  ;)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 05, 2016, 09:12:34 AM
Predictions and rankings based on Tournaments and Preseason.

1   Jr Gulls
2   Ice Dogs (1)
3   Wave-Art (1)
4   Jr. Kings
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
9   Mariners


Jr Gulls v. Wave-Art (1)               Jr Gulls by 1
Jr Ducks (2) v. Jr. Kings               Jr Kings by  1
Jr Ducks (1) v. Ice Dogs (1)         Ice Dogs by 3
Bears v. Mariners                        Bears by 8
Wave-Ont (2) v. Jr Gulls              Jr Gulls by 7
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 05, 2016, 11:29:23 PM
Predictions and rankings based on Tournaments and Preseason.

1   Jr Gulls
2   Ice Dogs (1)
3   Wave-Art (1)
4   Jr. Kings
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
9   Mariners


Jr Gulls v. Wave-Art (1)               Jr Gulls by 1
Jr Ducks (2) v. Jr. Kings               Jr Kings by  1
Jr Ducks (1) v. Ice Dogs (1)         Ice Dogs by 3
Bears v. Mariners                        Bears by 8
Wave-Ont (2) v. Jr Gulls              Jr Gulls by 7

Jr Ducks (2) v. Jr Kings and Jr Ducks (1) v. Ice Dogs should be very good games. I'd take the points in both.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 06, 2016, 04:37:58 PM
Schedule is out on SCAHA, btw.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on October 07, 2016, 03:18:32 PM
Thought there was supposed to be a minimum of 16 regular season games???
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 07, 2016, 04:01:19 PM
Thought there was supposed to be a minimum of 16 regular season games???

Where did you hear that?  I think due to more pre-season games regular season was shortened a bit.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 07, 2016, 05:34:53 PM
Thought there was supposed to be a minimum of 16 regular season games???

Where did you hear that?  I think due to more pre-season games regular season was shortened a bit.

20 games total. 5 preseason. 15 regular season. And for your loyalty and dedication, you've already been rewarded with a playoff spot!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on October 07, 2016, 06:57:02 PM
I think the SCAHA guidelines were just updated to 'a minimum of 15 regular season games'.  Yesterday it read 16.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 08, 2016, 09:29:55 PM
Artesia beat Gulls 4-2? Better hold off on those April flight plans to San Jose... this season looks wide open!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 08, 2016, 10:07:23 PM
Artesia beat Gulls 4-2? Better hold off on those April flight plans to San Jose... this season looks wide open!

Definitely wide open.  Artesia lost to Kings 5-2, Kings lost to Gulls 5-1 and Gulls lost to Artesia 4-2...  Its going to be a dog fight.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on October 09, 2016, 08:26:37 AM
Kings 10 Ducks2 5
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockeymomx on October 09, 2016, 11:12:13 AM
Ducks 1 7 Ice Dogs 1 4
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Northland on October 09, 2016, 04:05:43 PM
Ducks 1 7 Ice Dogs 1 4

Ice Dogs played this game without a goalie.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockeymomx on October 09, 2016, 04:30:02 PM
Really?  Wow!  What happened?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 6607 on October 09, 2016, 08:55:27 PM
Are the Ice Dogs the ones with goalie that commutes from San Jose?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 09, 2016, 09:07:05 PM
Are the Ice Dogs the ones with goalie that commutes from San Jose?

I think so.

I guess IDs had a 39 minute power play and JDs only got 7 shots on goal.  Can't tell much from that game.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: ABCDE on October 09, 2016, 10:35:37 PM
I heard ID SJ goalie didn't come down and their other goalie sick.  Not a bad showing if that's the case.  JMO
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 10, 2016, 06:49:51 AM
Kings 10 Ducks2 5

Wow. Did not expect such a blowout.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Attitude is Everything on October 10, 2016, 08:44:09 AM
I heard ID SJ goalie didn't come down and their other goalie sick.  Not a bad showing if that's the case.  JMO

Yes that is the case, San Jose was scheduled off this game when the other goal be came ill.  :-\
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Attitude is Everything on October 10, 2016, 08:49:18 AM
Artesia beat Gulls 4-2? Better hold off on those April flight plans to San Jose... this season looks wide open!

Definitely wide open.  Artesia lost to Kings 5-2, Kings lost to Gulls 5-1 and Gulls lost to Artesia 4-2...  Its going to be a dog fight.

Artesia did play a great game! It is was a close one with both teams working hard, it was 3-2 with a minute left in the game and the Gulls pulled the goalie and the Wave hit the empty net.

Great job Artesia! No shame for the Gulls. It's going to be a great season.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Rats13 on October 10, 2016, 11:06:18 AM
I heard ID SJ goalie didn't come down and their other goalie sick.  Not a bad showing if that's the case.  JMO

No goalie in one net throws both teams off.  What a bummer for both teams.  Especially during preseason.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 10, 2016, 12:24:53 PM
I heard ID SJ goalie didn't come down and their other goalie sick.  Not a bad showing if that's the case.  JMO

Yes that is the case, San Jose was scheduled off this game when the other goal be came ill.  :-\

I thought they only have the SJ goalie.  I heard he was the one sick.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Attitude is Everything on October 10, 2016, 01:14:35 PM
I heard ID SJ goalie didn't come down and their other goalie sick.  Not a bad showing if that's the case.  JMO

Yes that is the case, San Jose was scheduled off this game when the other goal be came ill.  :-\

I thought they only have the SJ goalie.  I heard he was the one sick.

Nope they have 2  8)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 11, 2016, 12:32:55 PM
There is hope people...

http://themanatee.net/ten-year-old-signed-to-nhl-due-to-parents-coaching-from-stands/
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: lcadad on October 11, 2016, 01:19:33 PM
Quote
The LeBlancs also help to coach others during the game. “If the teenage referees make a ‘bad call,’ we point it out to the officials immediately and very loudly — sometimes face-to-face — so they have an opportunity to improve,” they said. “We regularly inquire as to whether the referees have a visual disability, whether they are awake, if they are acquainted with the game of hockey and the rules of the game, as well as asking how they fit their entire head inside of their own ass. In the end, I truly believe that the refs enjoy our honest and frank feedback on their performance.”

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 13, 2016, 10:05:50 AM
My end of Preseason rankings and predictions for this weekend:

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (1)
6   Jr Ducks (2)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Bears           v. Ice Dogs (1)       Ice Dogs by 3
Jr Ducks (2) v. Jr Ducks (1)        Jr Ducks (Runtso) by 2
Jr Gulls        v. Wave-Art (1)       Jr Gulls by 1
Jr. Kings      v. Wave-Ont (2)       Jr Kings by 7

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on October 13, 2016, 10:59:16 AM
I'll take the points in all 4 of those games.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 13, 2016, 02:54:31 PM
My end of Preseason rankings and predictions for this weekend:

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (1)
6   Jr Ducks (2)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Bears           v. Ice Dogs (1)       Ice Dogs by 3
Jr Ducks (2) v. Jr Ducks (1)        Jr Ducks (Runtso) by 2
Jr Gulls        v. Wave-Art (1)       Jr Gulls by 1
Jr. Kings      v. Wave-Ont (2)       Jr Kings by 7


Some good games. Who wins the battle of Anaheim? Runtso by 2? Seems high. And the Gulls beating Artesia... after losing to Artesia? Should be interesting. More importantly... how do we get real-time updates?! I prefer not waiting until SCAHA posts them all by Wednesday night... and sometimes Thursday morning.  :o
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on October 13, 2016, 03:58:17 PM
My end of Preseason rankings and predictions for this weekend:

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (1)
6   Jr Ducks (2)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Bears           v. Ice Dogs (1)       Ice Dogs by 3
Jr Ducks (2) v. Jr Ducks (1)        Jr Ducks (Runtso) by 2
Jr Gulls        v. Wave-Art (1)       Jr Gulls by 1
Jr. Kings      v. Wave-Ont (2)       Jr Kings by 7


Some good games. Who wins the battle of Anaheim? Runtso by 2? Seems high. And the Gulls beating Artesia... after losing to Artesia? Should be interesting. More importantly... how do we get real-time updates?! I prefer not waiting until SCAHA posts them all by Wednesday night... and sometimes Thursday morning.  :o


If you want immediate scores.. Everyone should go to their manager and ask them to post all scores that night. The second they hit submit, it's gets posted to SCAHA.com. LOL!  :P [size=78%] [/size]
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 13, 2016, 03:59:56 PM
My end of Preseason rankings and predictions for this weekend:

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (1)
6   Jr Ducks (2)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Bears           v. Ice Dogs (1)       Ice Dogs by 3
Jr Ducks (2) v. Jr Ducks (1)        Jr Ducks (Runtso) by 2
Jr Gulls        v. Wave-Art (1)       Jr Gulls by 1
Jr. Kings      v. Wave-Ont (2)       Jr Kings by 7


Some good games. Who wins the battle of Anaheim? Runtso by 2? Seems high. And the Gulls beating Artesia... after losing to Artesia? Should be interesting. More importantly... how do we get real-time updates?! I prefer not waiting until SCAHA posts them all by Wednesday night... and sometimes Thursday morning.  :o


If you want immediate scores.. Everyone should go to their manager and ask them to post all scores that night. The second they hit submit, it's gets posted to SCAHA.com. LOL!  :P




That night?! I said real-time!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on October 13, 2016, 04:02:23 PM
My end of Preseason rankings and predictions for this weekend:

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (1)
6   Jr Ducks (2)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Bears           v. Ice Dogs (1)       Ice Dogs by 3
Jr Ducks (2) v. Jr Ducks (1)        Jr Ducks (Runtso) by 2
Jr Gulls        v. Wave-Art (1)       Jr Gulls by 1
Jr. Kings      v. Wave-Ont (2)       Jr Kings by 7


Some good games. Who wins the battle of Anaheim? Runtso by 2? Seems high. And the Gulls beating Artesia... after losing to Artesia? Should be interesting. More importantly... how do we get real-time updates?! I prefer not waiting until SCAHA posts them all by Wednesday night... and sometimes Thursday morning.  :o


If you want immediate scores.. Everyone should go to their manager and ask them to post all scores that night. The second they hit submit, it's gets posted to SCAHA.com. LOL!  :P




That night?! I said real-time!


HAHA!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 2kids2teamsnomoney on October 16, 2016, 01:22:35 PM
Gulls 6 - Wave (Art) 5 Close game both teams played hard to the end.  8)

Any other scores from the weekend?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on October 16, 2016, 02:09:45 PM
ID overy bears 4-2
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 16, 2016, 02:21:23 PM
The SCAHA mobile version still only lists preseason. Annoying.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: lcadad on October 16, 2016, 05:24:47 PM
The SCAHA mobile version still only lists preseason. Annoying.


Agreed.  Not sure why they took the approach of doing a completely seperate interface rather than just making it grid based and responsive.


There are a few other really annoying bugs, like the wonky way that the stats screen works, and it's annoying tendency to use either session or cookies for pagination, and having that get invisibly stuck.  It's a pain just to make the selections of the information you want to see.  UI is not their strong point, clearly.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on October 16, 2016, 06:23:36 PM
The SCAHA mobile version still only lists preseason. Annoying.


Agreed.  Not sure why they took the approach of doing a completely seperate interface rather than just making it grid based and responsive.


There are a few other really annoying bugs, like the wonky way that the stats screen works, and it's annoying tendency to use either session or cookies for pagination, and having that get invisibly stuck.  It's a pain just to make the selections of the information you want to see.  UI is not their strong point, clearly.

I actually like the CAHA site... seems pretty easy to navigate for scores and schedules. The old scaha site didn't work in my phone browser, so I get why they were trying to change it.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: lcadad on October 16, 2016, 06:54:02 PM
Yeah but that is just basic stuff for any competent web design/development group these days.    There is some code that essentially degrades or hides stuff depending on the characteristics of the browser.  You have one set of code, rather than several completely different sets with different bugs in them.  For a site as simple as Scaha, I can't understand why they did a seperate codebase.   Needless to say you can see the problems -- the mobile site doesn't even offer the same information, and as pointed out, doesn't have the current standings or even regular season choice right now.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on October 16, 2016, 08:54:59 PM
Yeah but that is just basic stuff for any competent web design/development group these days.    There is some code that essentially degrades or hides stuff depending on the characteristics of the browser.  You have one set of code, rather than several completely different sets with different bugs in them.  For a site as simple as Scaha, I can't understand why they did a seperate codebase.   Needless to say you can see the problems -- the mobile site doesn't even offer the same information, and as pointed out, doesn't have the current standings or even regular season choice right now.

Haha, maybe you could email them and volunteer your services for free... after all, it is a non-profit organization.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: lcadad on October 16, 2016, 09:25:47 PM
I don't think that non-profit means that the people that coded the site did it for free.  ;)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: area51 on October 17, 2016, 08:58:17 AM
I was taught the trick of pulling up the scaha site on your phone. Don't go to scaha.com, just search "SCAHA". the scaha.com come site will be listed first, click on "standings" and the web version will open.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on October 17, 2016, 01:03:20 PM
I was taught the trick of pulling up the scaha site on your phone. Don't go to scaha.com, just search "SCAHA". the scaha.com come site will be listed first, click on "standings" and the web version will open.




It works!!! thanks for SHARE-ing area51.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 17, 2016, 01:33:20 PM
I was taught the trick of pulling up the scaha site on your phone. Don't go to scaha.com, just search "SCAHA". the scaha.com come site will be listed first, click on "standings" and the web version will open.




It works!!! thanks for SHARE-ing area51.


Ha! Just about to post as well! Life became so much easier... thank!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: lcadad on October 17, 2016, 01:47:01 PM
Seems like pretty much any link directly to the .xhtml pages will get you around the front door that directs to the "mobile" pages. 

Nice tip!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on October 19, 2016, 09:47:20 AM
If you have an android phone and use the chrome browser go to google in your browser. tap the 3 dots at the top right of the browser and select "request desktop site."  Then search for scaha and it will bring you to the scaha desktop site. There is a similar process for iphones I am sure.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 19, 2016, 09:54:35 AM
I was taught the trick of pulling up the scaha site on your phone. Don't go to scaha.com, just search "SCAHA". the scaha.com come site will be listed first, click on "standings" and the web version will open.

This is the process for iPhones   :D
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 20, 2016, 02:45:15 PM
Week 2 rankings and predictions for this weekend:

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (1)
6   Jr Ducks (2)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)


Jr Ducks (1) v. Ice Dogs (1)        Ice Dogs by 2
Jr Ducks (2) v. Bears                  Jr Ducks (EK) by 2
Wave-Art (1) v. Wave-Ont (2)     Wave (Art) by 6
Jr. Kings v. Jr Gulls                     Jr Gulls by 2
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 20, 2016, 03:00:44 PM
Week 2 rankings and predictions for this weekend:

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (1)
6   Jr Ducks (2)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)


Jr Ducks (1) v. Ice Dogs (1)        Ice Dogs by 2
Jr Ducks (2) v. Bears                  Jr Ducks (EK) by 2
Wave-Art (1) v. Wave-Ont (2)     Wave (Art) by 6
Jr. Kings v. Jr Gulls                     Jr Gulls by 2


I like Jr. Kings in the rematch. Jr. Ducks (Runtso) as well. I think they're better than record indicates. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 20, 2016, 03:06:13 PM
Kings are a good team, just think the Gulls size and physical play is tough for them.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on October 20, 2016, 07:52:15 PM
Week 2 rankings and predictions for this weekend:

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (1)
6   Jr Ducks (2)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)


Jr Ducks (1) v. Ice Dogs (1)        Ice Dogs by 2
Jr Ducks (2) v. Bears                  Jr Ducks (EK) by 2
Wave-Art (1) v. Wave-Ont (2)     Wave (Art) by 6
Jr. Kings v. Jr Gulls                     Jr Gulls by 2



Not sure how you have the Wave Art. at 1 when they've been beaten by the Kings, Gulls, and ID. 


power rankings according to myhockeyranking.com rating:


Kings 87.62
Gulls 87.08
Wave A 86.60
JD1  86.14
JD2 85.76
ID  85.71
Da Bears 84.45
Wave O 80.55
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 21, 2016, 12:54:21 AM
Week 2 rankings and predictions for this weekend:

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (1)
6   Jr Ducks (2)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)


Jr Ducks (1) v. Ice Dogs (1)        Ice Dogs by 2
Jr Ducks (2) v. Bears                  Jr Ducks (EK) by 2
Wave-Art (1) v. Wave-Ont (2)     Wave (Art) by 6
Jr. Kings v. Jr Gulls                     Jr Gulls by 2



Not sure how you have the Wave Art. at 1 when they've been beaten by the Kings, Gulls, and ID. 


power rankings according to myhockeyranking.com rating:


Kings 87.62
Gulls 87.08
Wave A 86.60
JD1  86.14
JD2 85.76
ID  85.71
Da Bears 84.45
Wave O 80.55

Not to mention, JD2 just beat JD1 last weekend, in opening game.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on October 21, 2016, 08:02:22 AM
Goalie Dad is a wave parent, perhaps?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 21, 2016, 09:11:15 AM
Week 2 rankings and predictions for this weekend:

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (1)
6   Jr Ducks (2)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)


Jr Ducks (1) v. Ice Dogs (1)        Ice Dogs by 2
Jr Ducks (2) v. Bears                  Jr Ducks (EK) by 2
Wave-Art (1) v. Wave-Ont (2)     Wave (Art) by 6
Jr. Kings v. Jr Gulls                     Jr Gulls by 2



Not sure how you have the Wave Art. at 1 when they've been beaten by the Kings, Gulls, and ID. 


power rankings according to myhockeyranking.com rating:


Kings 87.62
Gulls 87.08
Wave A 86.60
JD1  86.14
JD2 85.76
ID  85.71
Da Bears 84.45
Wave O 80.55

Not to mention, JD2 just beat JD1 last weekend, in opening game.

Something got messed up when I copied the rankings to the forum, thank you to several folks who pointed out my errors  :D.

Here are my corrected rankings (I still stand by my predictions). 

1   Jr Gulls
2   Wave-Art (1)
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 21, 2016, 10:51:09 AM
Week 2 rankings and predictions for this weekend:

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (1)
6   Jr Ducks (2)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)


Jr Ducks (1) v. Ice Dogs (1)        Ice Dogs by 2
Jr Ducks (2) v. Bears                  Jr Ducks (EK) by 2
Wave-Art (1) v. Wave-Ont (2)     Wave (Art) by 6
Jr. Kings v. Jr Gulls                     Jr Gulls by 2



Not sure how you have the Wave Art. at 1 when they've been beaten by the Kings, Gulls, and ID. 


power rankings according to myhockeyranking.com rating:


Kings 87.62
Gulls 87.08
Wave A 86.60
JD1  86.14
JD2 85.76
ID  85.71
Da Bears 84.45
Wave O 80.55

Not to mention, JD2 just beat JD1 last weekend, in opening game.

Something got messed up when I copied the rankings to the forum, thank you to several folks who pointed out my errors  :D .

Here are my corrected rankings (I still stand by my predictions). 

1   Jr Gulls
2   Wave-Art (1)
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)


Did anyone point out that you were almost perfect last week with winners and points (missed the Ice Dogs win by a goal)? Very impressive. You might have a future in odds making (if only the Caesar's book will pick up SCAHA Squirt A games!).
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on October 23, 2016, 05:06:16 PM
Kings 5, Gulls 2.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 23, 2016, 07:04:39 PM
Kings 5, Gulls 2.

Probably still rated below Artesia.  ???
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 23, 2016, 08:16:30 PM
After mys sons game this morning, we headed to watch the Gulls/Kings game. I've been listening to a lot of hoopla about them. They are the top two teams in our division hands down. The Gulls are bigger and stronger, but that didn't seem to bother the Kings which didn't back down. The Kings Coaching staff and spend will make the difference. Come March I wouldn't want to meet either team.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 23, 2016, 08:34:52 PM
Kings 5, Gulls 2.

Probably still rated below Artesia.  ???

I think Kings are number 1 now based on that result.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 23, 2016, 08:55:19 PM
I have to second that goalie_dad. But, you never know, their a very young team and that may catch up to them. At least we're all hoping it catches up to them.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 23, 2016, 09:05:36 PM
After mys sons game this morning, we headed to watch the Gulls/Kings game. I've been listening to a lot of hoopla about them. They are the top two teams in our division hands down. The Gulls are bigger and stronger, but that didn't seem to bother the Kings which didn't back down. The Kings Coaching staff and spend will make the difference. Come March I wouldn't want to meet either team.

Oh, you will! We're all in the playoffs (some obviously for less time than others)!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on October 23, 2016, 09:29:28 PM
Kings 5, Gulls 2.

Probably still rated below Artesia.  ???

I think Kings are number 1 now based on that result.

Kings also beat Wave Art 4-3 in an exhibition on Saturday
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 23, 2016, 09:54:08 PM
Their were several great performances today from the Net Keepers. I would rank them
1. Kings
2. Ducks 1
3. Bears
4. Gulls
5. Ducks 2
6. A. Waves
7.Ice Dogs
[size=78%]8. O. Waves[/size]
[/size]
[/size][size=78%]Ice Dogs/Gulls and A. Waves/Kings are both going to be great games and set the tone. Ducks 1 & 2 both with get a win!!!![/size]
[/size]
[/size]
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 26, 2016, 09:37:11 AM
I'm hoping the Kings don't always win, because when they do we have nothing to talk about. Either that or someone hacked into the website and stopped all transmissions.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Northland on October 26, 2016, 10:52:34 AM
Their were several great performances today from the Net Keepers. I would rank them
1. Kings
2. Ducks 1
3. Bears
4. Gulls
5. Ducks 2
6. A. Waves
7.Ice Dogs
[size=78%]8. O. Waves[/size]

[size=78%]Ice Dogs/Gulls and A. Waves/Kings are both going to be great games and set the tone. Ducks 1 & 2 both with get a win!!!![/size]



The Ice Dogs beat the Bears and JD1.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 26, 2016, 11:04:44 AM
The Ice Dog barely beat both those teams. And that's to say that the Ducks 1 had a bad game that day. When the ice Dogs beat the Gulls, A. Waves, Kings, Or Ducks 2 than we can start considering them as top four. Pre-season doesn't count......
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Northland on October 26, 2016, 12:37:52 PM
The Ice Dog barely beat both those teams. And that's to say that the Ducks 1 had a bad game that day. When the ice Dogs beat the Gulls, A. Waves, Kings, Or Ducks 2 than we can start considering them as top four. Pre-season doesn't count......

A win is a win and they are still 2 and 0 to start the regular season yet you have them ranked below the two teams they beat. 

I'd put them along with the Artesia Wave in the top 4 teams in the division already.  The Wave team in particular should only get better with time.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 26, 2016, 12:51:19 PM
I was ranking the Goalies in the original post not the teams. I would rank the Ice Dogs as a team at 5th at best. I wouldn't brag about beating the Ducks 1. They weren't on their game Sunday morning. Next time around the Dogs wont be beating them. This Sunday's game will show if the I.D. belong in the top 4. Regardless it will be a great season for this division
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 27, 2016, 03:22:18 PM
Where are my lines? I have some bets to place.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 27, 2016, 04:22:47 PM
Where are my lines? I have some bets to place.

Coming tonight, need to scout some practices tonight first.

:o ::) :o ::)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 27, 2016, 04:33:09 PM
We should just share notes so it makes it more competitive.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 27, 2016, 10:39:23 PM
We should just share notes so it makes it more competitive.

Competitive?! Too much stress. I like my games rolling in the 3rd period and the score differential stuck at 7.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 27, 2016, 11:02:12 PM
Rankings and this weeks picks.

1   Jr. Kings
2   Wave-Art (1)
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs (1)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
   
Jr Ducks (EK) by 6   
Jr Gulls by 1   
Jr Kings by 2   
Jr Ducks (Runtso) by 2   
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 27, 2016, 11:03:50 PM
Lol, everytime I think my 10 year old has figured it out. He does something to remind me he only 10 and completely unpredictable. When the boys should win they make it a barn burner.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 28, 2016, 09:12:12 AM
Rankings and this weeks picks.

1   Jr. Kings
2   Wave-Art (1)
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs (1)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
   
Jr Ducks (EK) by 6   
Jr Gulls by 1   
Jr Kings by 2   
Jr Ducks (Runtso) by 2


Hard to argue with anything this week. Might put Gulls ahead of Artesia, but could go either way. I'll take the favorites.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 28, 2016, 09:50:25 AM
Pre-game Ranking
1. Kings
2. Gulls
3. Ducks 2
4. A. Waves
5. Ice Dogs
6. Ducks 1
7. Bears
8. O. Waves



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 28, 2016, 10:45:47 AM
Pre-game Ranking
1. Kings
2. Gulls
3. Ducks 2
4. A. Waves
5. Ice Dogs
6. Ducks 1
7. Bears
8. O. Waves

Ducks 2 are too inconsistent I think, Wave have more consistency.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 28, 2016, 11:22:07 AM
Even though they are inconsistent now, they are older and a better team. The Waves don't play as a team enough, it's pass the puck to one of two guys and let them take all the shots. Until they start trusting their other teammates they won't get much better.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on October 28, 2016, 02:36:21 PM
I wouldn't exactly say the Jr Ducks 2 play as a team either. In fact, I think if they play less end to end then they may be worthy of their current ranking. I do think their goalie should be ranked higher though....
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: sjtender31 on October 28, 2016, 02:59:34 PM
Their were several great performances today from the Net Keepers. I would rank them
1. Kings
2. Ducks 1
3. Bears
4. Gulls
5. Ducks 2
6. A. Waves
7.Ice Dogs


So exactly what method do you use to come up with these rankings?? This stuff is hilarious
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on October 28, 2016, 03:09:17 PM
Their were several great performances today from the Net Keepers. I would rank them
1. Kings
2. Ducks 1
3. Bears
4. Gulls
5. Ducks 2
6. A. Waves
7.Ice Dogs


So exactly what method do you use to come up with these rankings?? This stuff is hilarious

Assume he used save percentage but there are so many other factors.  I think these goalie rankings are way off.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 28, 2016, 03:12:21 PM
Goals +/-, strength of schedule the first two weeks, observing all 10 + Goalies the last two weeks, individual talent, and most importantly my personal opinion and experience. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: sjtender31 on October 28, 2016, 04:17:18 PM
LMAO opinion!! Experience??? As a guy that has played, coached and been around goalies a long time it's pretty easy to see which goalies have a good technical training. All of these tenders do a great job; however I find it hilarious that you feel compelled to rank them. I'd say just wait until the 3/4 mark of the season and things should be pretty self explanatory. The division is relatively small and it should relatively easy to which tenders are game changers.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 28, 2016, 04:20:02 PM
I totally agree, it's early but thats still my opinion and this is a fluid situation so of course things will change.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 28, 2016, 05:18:25 PM
I suggest that we also not forget that they're 10-year old boys and we should probably factor in who owns the most powerful Pokemon card as well.  The M Blastoise EX card features 220 HP and pretty much kicks everyone's ass. So whichever goalie possess that kind of power will likely come out on top at the end of the season... unless he loses the card... or trades it away... or mom accidentally destroys it in the washing machine.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 2kids2teamsnomoney on October 29, 2016, 10:28:03 AM
Their were several great performances today from the Net Keepers. I would rank them
1. Kings
2. Ducks 1
3. Bears
4. Gulls
5. Ducks 2
6. A. Waves
7.Ice Dogs


So exactly what method do you use to come up with these rankings?? This stuff is hilarious

Assume he used save percentage but there are so many other factors.  I think these goalie rankings are way off.

What about teams with 2 goalies? Some play every other game, while some split the game. How would one figure that in?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 29, 2016, 10:40:55 AM
I was referring to their #1 Goalie, it's pretty obvious who the primary Goalie is a majority of the time. The assumption is that travel hockey is for development first and towards the end of the game winning.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 30, 2016, 08:35:26 AM
Good Luck to all the Teams today. May all the goalies make my predictions look good. First game is a blowout.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 30, 2016, 01:19:45 PM
I heard the Kings didn't walk on Water today. Depending on who started for them in net they may drop even lower. A. Waves have moved to the #1 ranking. Any update on the Gulls/Ice Dog Game?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 2kids2teamsnomoney on October 30, 2016, 02:51:57 PM
I heard the Kings didn't walk on Water today. Depending on who started for them in net they may drop even lower. A. Waves have moved to the #1 ranking. Any update on the Gulls/Ice Dog Game?

Gulls 4 - Dogs 0
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 2kids2teamsnomoney on October 30, 2016, 02:54:52 PM
I was referring to their #1 Goalie, it's pretty obvious who the primary Goalie is a majority of the time. The assumption is that travel hockey is for development first and towards the end of the game winning.

Not always, last season my son's team had 2 goalies each played 1/2 the game and they took turns who started.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on October 30, 2016, 06:31:40 PM
Bears beat Ducks (Runtso) 6-5.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 30, 2016, 07:22:34 PM
One of the parents kept me update on how the Gulls dominated the Ice Dogs from start to finish, even scored short handed when the Ice Dogs had pulled their goalie. My point early in the week still stands!!!!! 5th at best, Ducks 1 had a tough outing. They were ahead by three goals halfway through the 3rd period and gave up four goals to the Bears which had stiffling defense to finish the game. Don't know much about what happened at the Kings game besides that the A. Waves got the best of them today. Does anyone know what Goalie started in net for the Kings? The top four teams will be switching place throughout The Who season.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: BBelieber on October 31, 2016, 08:37:07 AM
One of the parents kept me update on how the Gulls dominated the Ice Dogs from start to finish, even scored short handed when the Ice Dogs had pulled their goalie. My point early in the week still stands!!!!! 5th at best,


Gulls dominated the whole game?  It was 0-0 until halfway through the second period.  Gulls are an outstanding team, though.   A well-oiled machine. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 31, 2016, 08:46:11 AM
Some think the glass is half full others realize that it's half empty. They are a very talented team, as soon as the Ice Dogs beat either the A. Waves, Ducks 2, Kings, or Gulls I will stand by my opinion. Thank you for supporting my opinion.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on October 31, 2016, 10:58:12 AM
I was referring to their #1 Goalie, it's pretty obvious who the primary Goalie is a majority of the time. The assumption is that travel hockey is for development first and towards the end of the game winning.

Not always, last season my son's team had 2 goalies each played 1/2 the game and they took turns who started.


You know what they say, when you have two starting goalies, you don't have any starting goalies.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Ian lap on October 31, 2016, 01:00:28 PM
Do the Bears have two goalies
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 31, 2016, 01:09:51 PM
They have one full time Goalie!!! He quite good, the only issue is their 2nd and 3rd line defense isn't any good and fail him. In the games I've seen that's what happened.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: trans4761 on October 31, 2016, 01:35:32 PM
They have one full time Goalie!!! He quite good, the only issue is their 2nd and 3rd line defense isn't any good and fail him. In the games I've seen that's what happened.
T the B sounds like a goalie dad. 
Never blame your D
Goalies need their D........D needs their forwards..  Team game
(spoken like. D dad)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on October 31, 2016, 01:40:10 PM
I totally agree, It is a team sport but also sometimes the Goalie let's the D down and other times the D let's the Goalie down.  No one is perfect but some stops should be routine. On either D or Goalie.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on October 31, 2016, 02:18:36 PM
Sometimes hot goalies play behind bad teams and sometimes hot teams play in front of bad goalies.  Both situations are less than ideal.  Regardless, parents have to understand this and keep their griping to themselves.  I have yet to hear a parent complain out loud about a goalie (though I'm sure it's happened) despite hearing goalie parents complain about the team in front of them.  Kids make mistakes, but nothing destroys confidence in a goalie more than when they openly complain about their team.  This is the coach's perspective...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: lcadad on November 01, 2016, 08:12:14 AM
They have one full time Goalie!!! He quite good, the only issue is their 2nd and 3rd line defense isn't any good and fail him. In the games I've seen that's what happened.


Yes very good goalie who had already had a strong squirt A season last year.  The majority of their team last season was 05's so the team was really built around him and the 2 other 06's who returned. He could easily have played up to peewee, so it's nice to see a family opting to stay in their age group and be a difference maker.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 01, 2016, 08:17:32 AM
I dont know the Goalie or the family, but it's quite obvious they made not only the right decision. But the best decision for their son. Kudos to them!!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on November 01, 2016, 02:04:28 PM
anyone hear the result of the Ducks2/Wave-O game?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 02, 2016, 09:29:37 PM
Ducks 2 O. Waves 0
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 04, 2016, 11:31:37 AM
This weeks rankings and picks.

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs (1)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
   
Jr Ducks (EK) v. Jr Kings --> Jr Kings by 2   
Jr Ducks (Runtso) v. Wave O --> Jr Ducks by 3   
Bears V. Jr Gulls --> Jr Gulls by 3   
Ice Dogs V. Wave A -->Wave (Art) by 2   
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 04, 2016, 01:14:27 PM
I think your rankings and picks are perfect. If the Ice Dogs think the belong in the top four Sunday is a good day to show it.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 04, 2016, 02:24:15 PM
This weeks rankings and picks.

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs (1)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
   
Jr Ducks (EK) v. Jr Kings --> Jr Kings by 2   
Jr Ducks (Runtso) v. Wave O --> Jr Ducks by 3   
Bears V. Jr Gulls --> Jr Gulls by 3   
Ice Dogs V. Wave A -->Wave (Art) by 2


Needs an update. Bears just beat Ducks (1) last weekend.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 04, 2016, 03:27:03 PM
This weeks rankings and picks.

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs (1)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
   
Jr Ducks (EK) v. Jr Kings --> Jr Kings by 2   
Jr Ducks (Runtso) v. Wave O --> Jr Ducks by 3   
Bears V. Jr Gulls --> Jr Gulls by 3   
Ice Dogs V. Wave A -->Wave (Art) by 2


Needs an update. Bears just beat Ducks (1) last weekend.

I know but I still think Jr Ducks are a better team based on what I have seen this season.  Next time they meet I think Ducks win by 2.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 04, 2016, 03:39:20 PM
The Ducks 1 also have more returning players that played Squirt A last year so their not as inexperienced as the Bears. They will finish ahead of the Bears this year.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 04, 2016, 05:08:06 PM
This weeks rankings and picks.

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs (1)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
   
Jr Ducks (EK) v. Jr Kings --> Jr Kings by 2   
Jr Ducks (Runtso) v. Wave O --> Jr Ducks by 3   
Bears V. Jr Gulls --> Jr Gulls by 3   
Ice Dogs V. Wave A -->Wave (Art) by 2


Needs an update. Bears just beat Ducks (1) last weekend.

I know but I still think Jr Ducks are a better team based on what I have seen this season.  Next time they meet I think Ducks win by 2.


That makes no sense. The two teams played. One team beat the other... but you "think" the losing team is better. Rank teams on what they've done, not what you think they're going to do.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Ian lap on November 04, 2016, 05:46:23 PM
I think the jr Ducks will beat the Jr kings mark my word
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on November 04, 2016, 05:50:06 PM


That makes no sense. The two teams played. One team beat the other... but you "think" the losing team is better. Rank teams on what they've done, not what you think they're going to do.


WOW! you must have the Stars over the Flames and Kings above the Penguins because they won last night, but then again... that Jr Ducks team the Bears beat last Sunday have yet to win a Regular season game... I'm with you on the Squirt A ranking.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 04, 2016, 06:08:12 PM
This weeks rankings and picks.

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs (1)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
   
Jr Ducks (EK) v. Jr Kings --> Jr Kings by 2   
Jr Ducks (Runtso) v. Wave O --> Jr Ducks by 3   
Bears V. Jr Gulls --> Jr Gulls by 3   
Ice Dogs V. Wave A -->Wave (Art) by 2


Needs an update. Bears just beat Ducks (1) last weekend.

I know but I still think Jr Ducks are a better team based on what I have seen this season.  Next time they meet I think Ducks win by 2.


That makes no sense. The two teams played. One team beat the other... but you "think" the losing team is better. Rank teams on what they've done, not what you think they're going to do.

 So in your opinion the better team always wins?  My rankings are based on my opinion, and wouldnt expect everyone agrees...I am not offended.    :D
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 04, 2016, 06:18:08 PM
This weeks rankings and picks.

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs (1)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
   
Jr Ducks (EK) v. Jr Kings --> Jr Kings by 2   
Jr Ducks (Runtso) v. Wave O --> Jr Ducks by 3   
Bears V. Jr Gulls --> Jr Gulls by 3   
Ice Dogs V. Wave A -->Wave (Art) by 2


Needs an update. Bears just beat Ducks (1) last weekend.

I know but I still think Jr Ducks are a better team based on what I have seen this season.  Next time they meet I think Ducks win by 2.


That makes no sense. The two teams played. One team beat the other... but you "think" the losing team is better. Rank teams on what they've done, not what you think they're going to do.

 So in your opinion the better team always wins?  My rankings are based on my opinion, and wouldnt expect everyone agrees...I am not offended.    :D


I just assumed you were being somewhat objective. Don't see the point otherwise. Oh well.



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 04, 2016, 06:29:30 PM
This weeks rankings and picks.

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs (1)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
   
Jr Ducks (EK) v. Jr Kings --> Jr Kings by 2   
Jr Ducks (Runtso) v. Wave O --> Jr Ducks by 3   
Bears V. Jr Gulls --> Jr Gulls by 3   
Ice Dogs V. Wave A -->Wave (Art) by 2


Needs an update. Bears just beat Ducks (1) last weekend.

I know but I still think Jr Ducks are a better team based on what I have seen this season.  Next time they meet I think Ducks win by 2.


That makes no sense. The two teams played. One team beat the other... but you "think" the losing team is better. Rank teams on what they've done, not what you think they're going to do.

 So in your opinion the better team always wins?  My rankings are based on my opinion, and wouldnt expect everyone agrees...I am not offended.    :D


I just assumed you were being somewhat objective. Don't see the point otherwise. Oh well.

Look at my history, I am objective.  Just think Ducks are stronger than Bears based on all their games played.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 04, 2016, 06:38:20 PM
 The scoreboard would disagree.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 04, 2016, 08:39:06 PM
I think the jr Ducks will beat the Jr kings mark my word

I'm sure it will be tighter than the 10-5 drubbing the Kings put on them last time.  Preseason or not, the Ducks got bushwhacked.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 04, 2016, 10:54:54 PM
Ducks 1 lost to the Ducks 2 by only 2, the Bears got beat up by the Ducks 2 8-0 so I would also rank the Ducks 1 above the Bears. I'm hoping that Ducks 2 beat the Kings but I'm not that confident about that. We hope they play like 9 year olds and the Ducks get a win. They are the most complete team in our division when their clicking on all cylinders...... we have to give credit where credit is due, if my son was an 2007 I would want him on that team because of the coaching and talent on that team. That being said I hope we smash them when we play them.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 05, 2016, 08:29:58 AM
By this logic, the Bears then should be below Ontario Wave. They lost to Ducks (2) 2-0. Even though they've also lost to the Bears.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 05, 2016, 08:49:16 AM
In some cases yes but not always. Sometimes the better team just doesn't play well and end up taking a L. It happens everyday. That's just Sports 101. Example if the Gulls get beat by the last place team is that team better than the Gulls?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 05, 2016, 09:35:18 AM
Bad analogy. Better analogy is if a winless 7th place team beats a winless 6th place team, which is better? In your logic, the still winless 6th place team... which is now in 7th. Umm...  :o
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 05, 2016, 10:12:20 AM
Lol, you are correct. My point was just because a team beats ones doesn't always mean they are better. I've seen both those teams play and the Duck 1 are better than the Bears. The O. Waves will get better with time but will not be better than either the Bears or Ducks 1.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on November 05, 2016, 12:59:16 PM
I think it comes down to body of work. I just use Myhockeyranking to stay sane.. lol.. just keep winning and the rest usually works itself out. Looking at one game usually comes down to the eye test and that's open to interpretation.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Landshark on November 05, 2016, 04:17:54 PM
 Using a ducks 1 versus ducks 2 game as a basis of comparison is fundamentally flawed.    The score means virtually nothing.  Often the when a club plays another team within the club they do not run up the score on the other team the way they would an opposing club.    It just makes sense that one coat would not want to embarrass other kids from his own [size=78%]program.  Rank whoever you want wherever you want but expect to get called under informed about you hockey if you use this kind of analysis,[/size]
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Landshark on November 05, 2016, 04:19:42 PM
Neither would a coach. Although some outerwear does seem to be bad in the sportsmanship category.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 06, 2016, 01:24:25 PM
Does anyone know the score of the A. Waves/ Ice Dogs? Ducks 2/ Kings was a good game. We used our size in the 1st period to overpower them, in the 2nd and 3rd their speed was to much for us. Plus their goalie was lights out!!!! Heard the Gulls beat the Bears 6-3.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Richard Cranium on November 06, 2016, 02:57:16 PM
I believe Ice Dogs v. Art Wave tied 3-3!!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 06, 2016, 03:16:22 PM
If that's the outcome of the A. Waves/Ice Dog game, I would rank the Ice Dogs at 4th in a half. Lol if the score is wrong I will adjust accordingly. Since all the games are over we might as well look at next weekend. The Ducks 2/ Gulls game will be a pick'em. Waves/ Ducks 1 should also be entertaining. Goalie_dad give us a early ranking and spread.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Richard Cranium on November 06, 2016, 03:23:09 PM
I was definitely impressed w the Ducks 2 team today... much more focused group and tougher opponent than the preseason meeting between  the Jr kings
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 06, 2016, 04:09:18 PM
Looks like only one interesting game next weekend.  Here are the early lines.  Rankings out in a few days.

Jr Ducks (2)  v. Jr Gulls            Jr Gulls by 1
Wave-Ont (2)  v. Ice Dogs (1)    Ice Dogs by 5
Wave-Art (1)  v. Jr Ducks (1)    Wave (Art) by 4
Jr. Kings  v. Bears                    Jr. Kings by 3
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 06, 2016, 04:30:39 PM
Thank Goalie_dad, can anyone confirm the scores of the other two games today. The Ducks 2 might beat the Gulls. At least I'm hoping so. It will be to heavyweights. It's a game with a lot of size.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 06, 2016, 05:04:41 PM
Next week's lines so early! How exciting. We have a whole week to debate. Seem pretty close. Duck (2) v. Gulls will be good. Ducks (2) could definitely win.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 06, 2016, 05:13:24 PM
It will be fun, as soon as Goalie_dad ranks the teams and the Ice Dogs aren't ranked where they should or shouldn't be some feathers will be ruffled. Lol the Ducks 1 may shock the A. Waves.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 06, 2016, 06:01:06 PM
It will be fun, as soon as Goalie_dad ranks the teams and the Ice Dogs aren't ranked where they should or shouldn't be some feathers will be ruffled. Lol the Ducks 1 may shock the A. Waves.


Doubt it. Artesia has too much fire power. Might be close until 3rd... until the better team always pulls away.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 06, 2016, 06:12:19 PM
It will be fun, as soon as Goalie_dad ranks the teams and the Ice Dogs aren't ranked where they should or shouldn't be some feathers will be ruffled. Lol the Ducks 1 may shock the A. Waves.


Doubt it. Artesia has too much fire power. Might be close until 3rd... until the better team always pulls away.

It won't be close.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 06, 2016, 06:20:07 PM
Spoken like a A. Waves dad. Lol, the firepower consist of one strong player and another that wants to be the man. But hates being touched let alone contact. The short bench will eventually catch up to the Waves.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 06, 2016, 07:08:12 PM
Spoken like a A. Waves dad. Lol, the firepower consist of one strong player and another that wants to be the man. But hates being touched let alone contact. The short bench will eventually catch up to the Waves.

I'm being realistic about the teams abilities.  You disagree with Wave by 4?  What's your line?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 06, 2016, 07:13:28 PM
I unfortunately agree but I'm hoping for a miracle. Lol maybe the Ducks play a exceptional game and the Waves don't. I know it's a really long shot.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 06, 2016, 07:24:05 PM
Spoken like a A. Waves dad. Lol, the firepower consist of one strong player and another that wants to be the man. But hates being touched let alone contact. The short bench will eventually catch up to the Waves.


At this level, a short bench is often an advantage. Better a tired 1st or 2nd line on the ice than an ineffective 3rd line that can't create their own shot... but HAVE to play because they're paying good money and the coach needs that skate clinic money.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 06, 2016, 07:35:06 PM
That's why our team is also looking for a Corporate sponsor so we can save our money for clinics or private lessons. But we just want the sponsorship not their opinion or control, I couldn't resist. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 06, 2016, 07:41:09 PM
The Miller Toyota Anaheim Jr Ducks does have a nice ring to it.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 06, 2016, 07:47:28 PM
I wouldn't complain, if you have a contact person or a lead I can follow up with I will place the calls tomorrow. I'm sure I can convince the Executive Board to consider it. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 07, 2016, 04:43:17 PM
Rankings have not changed from last week.  Early lines still hold.

 
1Wave-Art (1)
2Jr. Kings
3Jr Gulls
4Jr Ducks (2)
5Ice Dogs (1)
6Jr Ducks (1)
7Bears
8Wave-Ont (2)

 
Jr Ducks (2)  v. Jr Gulls Jr Gulls by 1
Wave-Ont (2)  v. Ice Dogs (1) Ice Dogs by 5
Wave-Art (1)  v. Jr Ducks (1) Wave (Art) by 4
Jr. Kings  v. Bears Jr Kings by 3
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on November 07, 2016, 08:35:17 PM
What exactly is the rationale for Wave first?  Kings defeated them twice, and they defeated kings once.  Gulls also exchanged wins with both Kings and Wave......Would your child happen to play for the wave? 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 07, 2016, 08:46:26 PM
What exactly is the rationale for Wave first?  Kings defeated them twice, and they defeated kings once.  Gulls also exchanged wins with both Kings and Wave......Would your child happen to play for the wave?

I think it is close between Wave and Kings but Wave have regular season win vs. Kings.  Kings have preseason win and scrimmage win vs. Wave.

Wave are very slightly ahead of Kings.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 07, 2016, 11:13:32 PM
Goalie_dad I totally agree with you. That being said if you compare the two I would prefer to play the Waves instead of the Kings. But they are both solid teams, the Kings are just after and a better coached team with a lot of speed.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 08, 2016, 07:30:29 AM
Top 3 seem pretty interchangeable right now... with Ducks (2) and Ice Dogs right there.  What ever happened with the Ducks (1) v. Ontario game this weekend? I'm guessing Ducks (1)... but the question is if they covered the line.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on November 08, 2016, 05:28:34 PM
Tommy, The Bomber - I can see your plea for your child athlete, and best of luck with the sponsorship as well. 
Sunday's scoresheet shows the Jr Ducks2 outshot the Jr Kings 29-14 and yet all you hear about the Jr Kings is their speed and how well they are coached.  On paper, appears they have a great goalie, which I guess can make any coach look good..
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 08, 2016, 05:45:03 PM
Thank, so i guess you don't have a lead for me. I can't speak for them thats just my observation. Their Goalie is really good, that being said their defense also did a great job supporting him and all their front line back checks. My son has been in net for many years and I still havent seen him score. So coaching makes a big difference. I also think our coaches are great. GO DUCKS!!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 08, 2016, 06:54:24 PM
Top 3 seem pretty interchangeable right now... with Ducks (2) and Ice Dogs right there.  What ever happened with the Ducks (1) v. Ontario game this weekend? I'm guessing Ducks (1)... but the question is if they covered the line.

No Ducks/Wave results yet? 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 09, 2016, 08:06:12 AM
Top 3 seem pretty interchangeable right now... with Ducks (2) and Ice Dogs right there.  What ever happened with the Ducks (1) v. Ontario game this weekend? I'm guessing Ducks (1)... but the question is if they covered the line.

No Ducks/Wave results yet?


If you follow other divisions, you'll notice it's always the same clubs that can't seem to send in their scorecards until Thursday.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on November 09, 2016, 08:46:05 AM
Thank, so i guess you don't have a lead for me. I can't speak for them thats just my observation. Their Goalie is really good, that being said their defense also did a great job supporting him and all their front line back checks. My son has been in net for many years and I still havent seen him score. So coaching makes a big difference. I also think our coaches are great. GO DUCKS!!!!
Good teams find a way to win. Even when they dont play their best. Sunday wasn't the best showing for the little kings. Regardless, they got the w.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 09, 2016, 09:17:43 AM
Go Kings_26 , you are completely correct. A win is a win and I give them credit for that.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on November 09, 2016, 10:33:28 AM
All teams make the playoffs ..... what will matter  is where everyone falls at the end of the season. It's gonna come down to seeding, matchups and believe it or not coaching as part of the team philosophy. Rolling the lines? Might not win.... shorten bench might win but players miss out on Development opportunities .... play goalie #2 ??? ? Or ride your #1 goalie??? coaching in playoffs plays a huge role...


Teams will rise and fall, will get better, upsets will happen , parents will complain about icetime ... just part of the process ...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 09, 2016, 08:49:02 PM
Ducks (1) beat Ontario 7-3. Probably doesn't change much... but Ontario seems to be playing better.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 09, 2016, 09:47:27 PM
Rankings have not changed from last week.  Early lines still hold.

 
1Wave-Art (1)
2Jr. Kings
3Jr Gulls
4Jr Ducks (2)
5Ice Dogs (1)
6Jr Ducks (1)
7Bears
8Wave-Ont (2)

 
Jr Ducks (2)  v. Jr Gulls Jr Gulls by 1
Wave-Ont (2)  v. Ice Dogs (1) Ice Dogs by 5
Wave-Art (1)  v. Jr Ducks (1) Wave (Art) by 4
Jr. Kings  v. Bears Jr Kings by 3

Adjusting line on Ducks Runtso v. Wave Artesia

Wave Artesia by 2
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 11, 2016, 09:11:02 PM
Goalie_dad, I'm surprised the Kings/Bear line is only 3. I like the Ducks/Gulls line, that will be a close one I hope. I still think the Ducks 1 may upset the A. Waves, it's a big may but possible. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on November 12, 2016, 07:07:49 PM
Hey Tommy, the Bomber is your child playing goal tomorrow? 


Or should we move the money to SD?



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 12, 2016, 07:17:06 PM
Keepdrinkinthekoolais, he is playing in goal tomorrow. The team have been playing better as a unit. Were heading in the right direction. Anytime the spread is 1 you just need a lucky roll or deflection.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 2kids2teamsnomoney on November 13, 2016, 01:44:20 PM
Gulls 5 - Ducks 1
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Richard Cranium on November 13, 2016, 02:39:16 PM
Jr Kings 10 - Bears 2
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 13, 2016, 02:41:03 PM
Gulls 5 - Ducks 1


Ducks are inconsistent.  They only beat Wave Ontario 2-0 recently also.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 13, 2016, 03:07:39 PM
Today we got beat by a team that is better than us!!!! I'm honest enough to admit it. That's why the Gulls are ranked ahead of us. The Gulls are solid on both ends of the ice. Our kids need to learn to be more consistent
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 2kids2teamsnomoney on November 13, 2016, 03:29:19 PM
Today we got beat by a team that is better than us!!!! I'm honest enough to admit it. That's why the Gulls are ranked ahead of us. The Gulls are solid on both ends of the ice. Our kids need to learn to be more consistent

Your kids worked hard! Sometimes you just can't get the biscuit in the basket.  Plus the last goal was on an empty net.

Isn't this Ducks team mostly 07's? 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 13, 2016, 03:33:10 PM
2Kids2teamsnomoney, unfortunately were not we are a mostly 06 team.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on November 13, 2016, 03:56:19 PM
JR. Ducks 2 mostly 06, maybe 5 07. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on November 13, 2016, 05:04:43 PM
Jr Ducks 2 shows a roster of 10 athletes & 2 goalies.  When we've seen them thought they were also 50/50 '06 & '07's..



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on November 13, 2016, 06:54:12 PM
Sounds right. Both goalies are 06 though.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 13, 2016, 06:59:32 PM
Did anyone catch the Kings game? Did they play the well or did the Bears play that bad?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 13, 2016, 06:59:44 PM
Sounds right. Both goalies are 06 though.

I think one goalie is an '06.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 13, 2016, 07:01:18 PM
Other than the Kings, who has an 07 goalie?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 13, 2016, 07:43:31 PM
Did anyone catch the Kings game? Did they play the well or did the Bears play that bad?

The Bears goalie made a ton of saves and was under duress the entire game.  The Bears opened up with a beautiful  goal early in the first period.  After that, it was all Kings.  I'd be interested in seeing how many shots were registered.  I'm guessing that the Kings put up at least forty shots total.  Had the Kings shot better (we missed a lot of shots high and wide) it might have been worse.  That said, Kings' speed carried the day.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on November 14, 2016, 10:29:12 AM
There are a few other 07 goalies around the BB circuit.... my guess is based on Brick history and lack of size and depth locally at least one of the goalies will be selected from out of town.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 14, 2016, 10:38:45 AM
Goalie_dad, we need next week's lines and rankings. The only interesting game will be the Ducks2 / Ice Dogs. The others are pretty much final already.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 14, 2016, 05:00:38 PM
Goalie_dad, we need next week's lines and rankings. The only interesting game will be the Ducks2 / Ice Dogs. The others are pretty much final already.


In related sports news, the college football season has been scrapped today as Alabama is clearly the best team in the nation and no one will ever beat them... because the best team always wins. Always.   :o


Getting a bit overconfident, aren't we?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 14, 2016, 05:06:34 PM
Goalie_dad, I was wondering why the Tide were planning their parade already. Sometimes even the best loss but in saying that it's also rare. No disrespect intended to any clubs. When we play the Gulls, Ice Dogs, and Kings as long as we work hard anything is possible. But I also know that if their also on their A game they are really difficult to beat. I'm a realist!!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 14, 2016, 05:38:10 PM
You're in the wrong place... we're all dreamers.


Any given Sunday.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 14, 2016, 07:23:07 PM
Again no changes in rankings.  Not much excitement happening recently...

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs (1)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
   
Bears v. Wave (Art)                   Wave (Art) by 4
Jr Gulls v. Wave (Ont)                Jr Gulls by 6
Ice Dogs v. Jr Ducks (EK)           Jr Ducks by 1
Jr. Kings v. Jr Ducks (Runtso)     Jr Kings by 4
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockey999999 on November 14, 2016, 07:41:30 PM
Other than the Kings, who has an 07 goalie?


Ducks (EK) and Ducks (Runtso) have one '07 goalie each I think.  I don't know of any others.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 14, 2016, 07:47:27 PM
Goalie_dad, I was wondering why the Tide were planning their parade already. Sometimes even the best loss but in saying that it's also rare. No disrespect intended to any clubs. When we play the Gulls, Ice Dogs, and Kings as long as we work hard anything is possible. But I also know that if their also on their A game they are really difficult to beat. I'm a realist!!!!

The Tide are lucky they played USC at the beginning of the year.  Result would have been much different now.  If only Darnold would have started from the beginning of the season...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 14, 2016, 08:02:23 PM
Goalie_dad, your going to get a lot of grief for saying the Ducks 1 will beat the Ice Dogs. Some people are sensitive about the Ice Dogs not being added to the top four. Lol cant wait to see the Gulls or Kings against the A. Waves to see who will knock them off their perch.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 14, 2016, 08:50:19 PM
Goalie_dad, your going to get a lot of grief for saying the Ducks 1 will beat the Ice Dogs. Some people are sensitive about the Ice Dogs not being added to the top four. Lol cant wait to see the Gulls or Kings against the A. Waves to see who will knock them off their perch.


Ducks (2) are playing Ice Dogs, not Ducks (1). And Duck (2) will likely win. Might be close, though. Ice Dogs are better than early season performance. Other lines look low. Gulls, Kings, and Artesia could all win by more.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 16, 2016, 10:00:44 AM
What happened with Ice Dogs v. Ontario Wave last weekend, by the way? It's Wednesday and the team manager from Ontario appears to still be walking the stat sheet  from Ontario to the SCAHA headquarters.  ???   
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: BBelieber on November 16, 2016, 11:51:55 AM
What happened with Ice Dogs v. Ontario Wave last weekend, by the way?


Dogs won, 8 - 0.  Wave played better than the score suggests; they are coming together quickly. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on November 17, 2016, 02:02:24 PM
Not to get too preachy, but this is straight from the SCAHA Guidelines.  It's my understanding that as soon as the scoresheet is entered, it is available on the site.  I wonder if that SCAHA cash register has rung once.


"For A/B teams, the home club is responsible for the distribution of the scoresheets. The home club must enter all game statistics and upload a legible scanned copy of the scoresheet on the SCAHA website by 10pm of the following Monday after the game date. Clubs failing to complete the scoresheet procedures will be warned by the League Statistician. Upon second notification, the club will be assessed a $50 fine per late scoresheet."
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 17, 2016, 02:33:35 PM
Not to get too preachy, but this is straight from the SCAHA Guidelines.  It's my understanding that as soon as the scoresheet is entered, it is available on the site.  I wonder if that SCAHA cash register has rung once.


"For A/B teams, the home club is responsible for the distribution of the scoresheets. The home club must enter all game statistics and upload a legible scanned copy of the scoresheet on the SCAHA website by 10pm of the following Monday after the game date. Clubs failing to complete the scoresheet procedures will be warned by the League Statistician. Upon second notification, the club will be assessed a $50 fine per late scoresheet."

I'm guessing they do not  enforce this.  Wave are late every week.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Puck Yeah on November 17, 2016, 06:58:08 PM
Not to get too preachy, but this is straight from the SCAHA Guidelines.  It's my understanding that as soon as the scoresheet is entered, it is available on the site.  I wonder if that SCAHA cash register has rung once.


"For A/B teams, the home club is responsible for the distribution of the scoresheets. The home club must enter all game statistics and upload a legible scanned copy of the scoresheet on the SCAHA website by 10pm of the following Monday after the game date. Clubs failing to complete the scoresheet procedures will be warned by the League Statistician. Upon second notification, the club will be assessed a $50 fine per late scoresheet."

I'm guessing they do not  enforce this.  Wave are late every week.


Send a polite and respectful email to SCAHA.  They have warned managers in the past.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 17, 2016, 07:00:43 PM
Maybe the manager reads CalHockey or the spouse does and they figure it soon. It's not rocket science!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on November 19, 2016, 03:18:38 PM

 
1Wave-Art (1)
2Jr. Kings
3Jr Gulls
4Jr Ducks (2)
5Ice Dogs (1)
6Jr Ducks (1)
7Bears
8Wave-Ont (2)

 
Jr Ducks (2)  v. Jr Gulls Jr Gulls by 1
Wave-Ont (2)  v. Ice Dogs (1) Ice Dogs by 5
Wave-Art (1)  v. Jr Ducks (1) Wave (Art) by 2
Jr. Kings  v. Bears Jr Kings by 3



had to repost the lines for the week with the adjustment.  good luck to all the Squirt A teams this week.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 19, 2016, 03:41:42 PM

 
1Wave-Art (1)
2Jr. Kings
3Jr Gulls
4Jr Ducks (2)
5Ice Dogs (1)
6Jr Ducks (1)
7Bears
8Wave-Ont (2)

 
Jr Ducks (2)  v. Jr Gulls Jr Gulls by 1
Wave-Ont (2)  v. Ice Dogs (1) Ice Dogs by 5
Wave-Art (1)  v. Jr Ducks (1) Wave (Art) by 2
Jr. Kings  v. Bears Jr Kings by 3



had to repost the lines for the week with the adjustment.  good luck to all the Squirt A teams this week.

Those lines are from the previous week.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 19, 2016, 03:59:51 PM
Goalie_dad it's been so quiet that nuffsed wanted to start a conversation. lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on November 19, 2016, 05:11:33 PM
Again no changes in rankings.  Not much excitement happening recently...

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs (1)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)
   
Bears v. Wave (Art)                   Wave (Art) by 4
Jr Gulls v. Wave (Ont)                Jr Gulls by 6
Ice Dogs v. Jr Ducks (EK)           Jr Ducks by 1
Jr. Kings v. Jr Ducks (Runtso)     Jr Kings by 4
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on November 19, 2016, 05:11:47 PM

what Tommy, The Bomber said.  it's definitely been quiet in here.
😂😆😂😆😂[/size]😆😂[/size]😆😂[/size]😆😂[/size]😆😂[/size]😆😂[/size]😆😂
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 19, 2016, 05:22:43 PM
What team is most likely to be upset tomorrow?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 19, 2016, 05:40:48 PM
What team is most likely to be upset tomorrow?

Although I don't think it is likely, best chance for an upset is Ice Dogs beating Ducks (EK).  I think there is a chance Ducks (Runtso) stay within 2 against the Kings but no upset there.  Wave have no chance of staying close, nor do Bears.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 19, 2016, 05:53:34 PM
The Ice Dogs/Ducks 2 game will be close. The Kings have been playing well so if the Ducks 1 don't be careful they may steam roll them also.  I heard that the O. Waves are playing better, but no one has any faith in the Bears. When the Bears play the O. Waves that line will be interesting.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on November 20, 2016, 08:46:22 AM
Anyone hear about the scrimmage EK vs. jr kings yesterday? [size=78%]Jr kings showing inconsistency. I see a potential Runtso team upset today [/size] 8) 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 20, 2016, 09:12:21 AM
Yes, our boys played extremely well yesterday!!! We were faster, stronger, more physical, out shot, and played great as a unit. Both lines were on their game, same with both of our net tenders. That being said that is the worst game I've seen them play against us. If they played the way they have in the past against us it would've been a pick'em. The boys are starting to trust each other and realizing that one guy can't do it all. I want to see how they do against the Ducks 1 today before I also start throwing stones. I hope our Ducks 1 takes it to them!!!!!! Quack Quack Quack GO DUCKS!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 20, 2016, 09:17:40 AM
Anyone hear about the scrimmage EK vs. jr kings yesterday? [size=78%]Jr kings showing inconsistency. I see a potential Runtso team upset today [/size] 8)

Details on the scrimmage?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 20, 2016, 10:00:56 AM
Does anyone know who won the A.Waves/Bears game?
Goalie_dad, it wasn't close at all. A majority of the 3rd period was running clock. They scored 2 goals in the last few minutes.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 20, 2016, 04:34:43 PM
The game earlier was more than physical, that play was dirty as hell!!!! That's how kids get hurt, plus it's a long season. There is no place in Squirt of PW for hits like that. If the refs cant control the games the kids will, and it is proven that they dont always make the best decisions.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 20, 2016, 04:49:13 PM
The game earlier was more than physical, that play was dirty as hell!!!! That's how kids get hurt, plus it's a long season. There is no place in Squirt of PW for hits like that. If the refs cant control the games the kids will, and it is proven that they dont always make the best decisions.

Ducks lose?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 20, 2016, 04:53:48 PM
Ducks 2 lost, Ducks 1 shouldve beat the Kings but couldn't close in the last 3 minutes.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on November 20, 2016, 05:28:15 PM
Wave (Artesia) win handily.  After being close in 1st., pulled away in 2nd & 3rd periods, 9-2.

Ducks 2 had a dirty play against them by Ice Dogs?  Who would have ever guessed?  Doesn't a team usually take on the personality of their Coach?  Do tell more, please. 

Final score of Ducks 2 vs Ice Dogs?

Also, final score of scrimmage on Saturday?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: sjtender31 on November 20, 2016, 05:59:43 PM
Dirty play against them?? You have to be kidding......the play was nothing other than two kids going  for the same real estate BOTH with their heads down. Ice Dog player happens to be much larger so it definitely looked worse; however before you go call a 10yr old dirty you should see it. These kids definitely take on the coaches personality, which is gritty and hard working but definitely not dirty. Here's an angle from the play that validates that both players went for the pick at the same time


https://youtu.be/y5HsqHoVqwc
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 20, 2016, 06:06:54 PM
Dirty play against them?? You have to be kidding......the play was nothing other than two kids going  for the same real estate BOTH with their heads down. Ice Dog player happens to be much larger so it definitely looked worse; however before you go call a 10yr old dirty you should see it. These kids definitely take on the coaches personality, which is gritty and hard working but definitely not dirty. Here's an angle from the play that validates that both players went for the pick at the same time


https://youtu.be/y5HsqHoVqwc (https://youtu.be/y5HsqHoVqwc)

looked like little guy had puck and ID player ran right into him, certainly a penalty.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 20, 2016, 06:15:36 PM
Dirty play against them?? You have to be kidding......the play was nothing other than two kids going  for the same real estate BOTH with their heads down. Ice Dog player happens to be much larger so it definitely looked worse; however before you go call a 10yr old dirty you should see it. These kids definitely take on the coaches personality, which is gritty and hard working but definitely not dirty. Here's an angle from the play that validates that both players went for the pick at the same time


https://youtu.be/y5HsqHoVqwc

That looks nothing like what I had heard about today.  From what I can see, that was two kids going for the same puck where one was giving up thirty plus pounds.

Ducks 1 goalie today made a ton of good saves.  Kings played only slightly better than yesterday and only tied/went ahead late.  Ducks 1 deserve a lot of credit.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: sjtender31 on November 20, 2016, 06:20:22 PM
Sure it's definitely a penalty, and the player needs to learn to keep his head up; however they're squirt players and a penalty and a dirty play/player are entirely different. The ID player is actually a pretty sesnsotove kid that doesn't mean to ever hurt anyone and then to have a dad come drop F bombs repeatedly at the player in the box and ID bench was ridiculous. Keep it in perspective people! The most important part of the entire play was making sure the injured player was ok.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on November 20, 2016, 06:56:07 PM
Sure it's definitely a penalty, and the player needs to learn to keep his head up; however they're squirt players and a penalty and a dirty play/player are entirely different. The ID player is actually a pretty sesnsotove kid that doesn't mean to ever hurt anyone and then to have a dad come drop F bombs repeatedly at the player in the box and ID bench was ridiculous. Keep it in perspective people! The most important part of the entire play was making sure the injured player was ok.


Yelling at the kid while in the Box??? Was he reported?? I've seen parents get a Match for doing less!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 20, 2016, 07:24:59 PM
Doesn't look like a dirty play from the video... D was going for it, skated into kid with puck. It was a body on body play. Happens all the time at Squirt. Is the kid okay?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 20, 2016, 08:03:25 PM
Ducks 2 4/ Ice Dogs 5
Yesterday
Ducks 2 8/ Kings 3
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 20, 2016, 08:03:59 PM
Treat for you gentlemen.  Early rankings, only movement Ducks 2 and IDs, and picks for next Fridays tournament games - Wave (Art) playing in Arizona, Ice Dogs/Gulls playing in San Diego and the rest in Anaheim:

1    Wave-Art (1)
2    Jr. Kings
3    Jr Gulls
4    Ice Dogs (1)
5    Jr Ducks (2)

6    Jr Ducks (1)
7    Bears
8    Wave-Ont (2)

AHU Silver v. Wave Artesia          Wave by 3
Nevada Storm v. Jr Gulls            Jr Gulls by 1
Ice Dogs v. Jr Gulls                Jr Gulls by 2
Flagstaff North v. Ice Dogs         Ice Dogs by 3
Wave Ontario v. Jr Ducks Runtso     Jr Ducks (Runtso) by 4
Bears v. Jr Ducks EK                Jr Ducks (EK) by 3
Jr Kings v. Jr Ducks SQ BB (1)      Jr Kings by 12
Jr Ducks EK v. Jr Ducks Runtso      Jr Ducks (EK) by 2
Bears v. Jr Kings                   Jr Kings by 4
Wave Ontario v. Jr Ducks SQ BB (1)  Wave (Ontario) by 2
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 20, 2016, 08:22:31 PM
Why are the Ducks BB even in that Squirt A tournament.  Goalie_dad who is playing in the finals for this tournament. What's your prediction on the champion.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 2kids2teamsnomoney on November 21, 2016, 07:40:21 AM
Wave (Artesia) win handily.  After being close in 1st., pulled away in 2nd & 3rd periods, 9-2.

Ducks 2 had a dirty play against them by Ice Dogs?  Who would have ever guessed?  Doesn't a team usually take on the personality of their Coach?  Do tell more, please. 

Final score of Ducks 2 vs Ice Dogs?

Also, final score of scrimmage on Saturday?


Sounds like someone has personal issues with the ID coach.  ::)
Personally I really like the ID coach - he has coached my kid for years both ice and roller. I wouldn't think twice about letting him coach my kid again. But it's a long drive so we'll stay where we are .... for now  ;)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: BBelieber on November 21, 2016, 08:33:26 AM
Doesn't look like a dirty play from the video... D was going for it, skated into kid with puck. It was a body on body play. Happens all the time at Squirt. Is the kid okay?


The player didn't miss a single shift.  I assume that means he's okay. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on November 21, 2016, 10:23:41 AM
Although I feel for the Jr Ducks kid who may or may not belong in the company of the big players, I'm more concerned for the BIGGER Ice Dog Defenseman who may or may not have been coached to make use of that big frame and WIN the puck.  Penalty should have been on the JrDucks' Forward for taking a DIVE... apparently he "didn't miss a single shift."  The Defenseman clearly has his stick down, which tells me he had intentions to play the puck and NOT just skating into the Forward.  Some parents should enjoy these few years of FUN hockey... don't allow what happens on the ice to get you so fired up you have to use profanity to a 10 year old, because had that been MY kid you were cussing at, you may not like his response.  Football is taking all precautions these days to ruin their sport, it's cheaper too, I'm sure they'll take your abled body and temper as well. Nuffsed.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Rats13 on November 21, 2016, 10:47:50 AM
Didn't look "dirty".  Certainly a penalty in squirts probably Pee Wee too.  Can't go through a player to get the puck.   Definitely not a dive.  Looked like the kid got rocked.

Any parent screaming at kid in box needs to have their head examined.  And that goes for any parent screaming "the kid took a dive" at a player down on the ice (Not here...but I've seen it).

Just my unsolicited 2 cents.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 6607 on November 21, 2016, 11:00:25 AM
Watched the video a few times, looked at the score sheet.  IMHO, refs got this one right.  Clear  charging.  Not a dive and not a dirty play.   Scoresheet shows a fair number of roughs and body checks, looks like by both teams.   Forward needs to learn to keep his head up.  Defender needs to learn how to use his size and realize that big kid/smaller kid collisions will draw a call at this level.  Hopefully, the team has a long talk to the parent who thought it was acceptable to lay into a kid in the penalty box.  BTW, if you are not comfortable with the play on the video, its time for you to find a different sport for your kid.  Game gets much bigger, faster, and rougher at Pee Wee, even though technically checking is not allowed. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Puck Yeah on November 21, 2016, 02:59:19 PM
Watched the video a few times, looked at the score sheet.  IMHO, refs got this one right.  Clear  charging.  Not a dive and not a dirty play.   Scoresheet shows a fair number of roughs and body checks, looks like by both teams.   Forward needs to learn to keep his head up.  Defender needs to learn how to use his size and realize that big kid/smaller kid collisions will draw a call at this level.  Hopefully, the team has a long talk to the parent who thought it was acceptable to lay into a kid in the penalty box.  BTW, if you are not comfortable with the play on the video, its time for you to find a different sport for your kid.  Game gets much bigger, faster, and rougher at Pee Wee, even though technically checking is not allowed.


Not just at SQ level any more.  10 & 2s are handed out like M&Ms on Halloween even at Bantam.  I suspect the Officials have been schooled on calling them because the calls are happening on all teams by all Refs.  European hockey is coming your way folks.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Iceinmyveins on November 21, 2016, 09:12:13 PM
If the parent was whining about that play then he needs to remove his child and himself from the sport of hockey then pick up a new hobby like chess. Yes it was a penalty at Squirt/PW Level, but body contact is to be expected in hockey and I will never discourage puck aggression. So lesson learned to the kid who ran into a wall is to have your head on a swivel at all times and the other player needs to learn how to properly battle for the puck or this won't be the only time he is sitting in the box.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 21, 2016, 09:29:51 PM
It wasn't even my kid that got hit, but I hope that everyone that is ok with that hit still has the same stance if it were their kid. I also don't condone any parent berating any 10 year regardless of the situation. That was uncalled for and embarrassed our club.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: BigDuke6 on November 21, 2016, 09:58:02 PM
Didn't look horrible, certainly didn't look dirty.  It was a penalty, but in a few years these kids will be bantams and that won't be a penalty.  Never too early to learn to keep your head up.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on November 21, 2016, 10:03:34 PM
It wasn't even my kid that got hit, but I hope that everyone that is ok with that hit still has the same stance if it were their kid. I also don't condone any parent berating any 10 year regardless of the situation. That was uncalled for and embarrassed our club.


To say "everyone that is ok with that hit" would claim some members condone it... can't speak for everyone, but if the Defenseman's intentions were to just hit the oncoming Forward, than the Defenseman should do the time. I still stand by the Defenseman was attempting to play the puck, but I was not present for this game nor do I read minds of 10 year olds.  However, I still stand by the JrDucks kid who rolled TWICE to sell that he was knocked down... DIVE.  Just like they do in soccer, sell the contact to get a call.  Call made was correct, but C'monMan... "he didn't miss a single shift." Oh well, my opinion.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Iceinmyveins on November 21, 2016, 10:55:17 PM
Get your head up or get hit is the message I preach to my son. So one of the risks I understand playing the game for over 30 years and now being a parent is that with hockey your gonna get hit regardless of if it's clean or not and there is no crying in hockey. I would not be the least bit mad if that were my son and as long as my son wasn't concussed he would skate back to the bench even if he was in tears hurting.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on November 22, 2016, 08:00:16 AM
Nothing to worry about when your team plays the Bears.  We don't hit anyone...nor the back of the net.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 22, 2016, 08:17:31 AM
Bear71, I dont even know how to respond to that. Is that a dig at your coach or kids.  Either way I probably wouldn't have posted that. If the Bears are soft I would probably look at the parents, apples don't fall far from the tree.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 22, 2016, 09:20:47 AM
Bear71, I dont even know how to respond to that. Is that a dig at your coach or kids.  Either way I probably wouldn't have posted that. If the Bears are soft I would probably look at the parents, apples don't fall far from the tree.


YES!  First parent fight of the year!  Alright, alright, alright... your kid apparently plays for the Ducks (2), which is very convenient, since the Bears play Ducks (2) on Friday morning in Yorba Linda.  So here are the rules: chains and sticks only. No knives. No guns.  Loser has to watch from the arcade area atop the fifty cent toddler plane ride while wearing the winner's team jersey.


Not to mention, these two teams have a bit of a blood rivalry going after the last debacle at KHS. This will work out nicely.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 22, 2016, 09:26:35 AM
Just Saying, that is hilarious. I'm game. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 22, 2016, 10:18:42 AM
But let's make sure everyone has their insurance policies up to date... or has Trump already canceled all those?  Damn it... you know what, let's just have a drinking contest.  Same place.  Same time.  Everyone wins.


But I have to warn you, Bears have a LOT of alcoholics in the stands.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on November 22, 2016, 12:05:13 PM
Bear71, I dont even know how to respond to that. Is that a dig at your coach or kids.  Either way I probably wouldn't have posted that. If the Bears are soft I would probably look at the parents, apples don't fall far from the tree.


More comic relief than anything else, TTB.  Our kids and coaches are just fine, as is our parents' ability to consume adult beverages (on an as needed basis).
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 22, 2016, 12:43:45 PM
I see the humor, I just would've never said that about a club I'm affiliated with, especially on a public form. What message does that send.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 22, 2016, 12:57:47 PM
Complete lines including predictions for tournaments.  Kings win Rinks tournament, Gulls win Ice Plex tournament and Krivo ('06) win AHU tournament.

Nov 25 AHU Silver v. Wave Artesia                   Wave by 3   
Nov 25 Nevada Storm v. Jr Gulls                      Jr Gulls by 1   
Nov 25 Ice Dogs v. Jr Gulls                              Jr Gulls by 2   
Nov 25 Flagstaff North v. Ice Dogs                   Ice Dogs by 3   
Nov 25 Wave Ontario v. Jr Ducks Runtso          Jr Ducks (Runtso) by 4   
Nov 25 Bears v. Jr Ducks EK                            Jr Ducks (EK) by 3   
Nov 25 Jr Kings v. Jr Ducks SQ BB (1)              Jr Kings by 12   
Nov 25 Jr Ducks EK v. Jr Ducks Runtso             Jr Ducks (EK) by 2   
Nov 25 Bears v. Jr Kings                                  Jr Kings by 4   
Nov 25 Wave Ontario v. Jr Ducks SQ BB (1)      Wave (Ontario) by 2   

Nov 26 Jr Coyotes Chytka v. Wave Artesia        Wave (Art) by 2   
Nov 26 Krivo School of Hockey v. Wave Artesia Krivo (Art) by 2   
Nov 26 Flagstaff North v. Jr Gulls                     Jr Gulls by 3   
Nov 26 Nevada Storm v. Ice Dogs                   Storm by 2   
Nov 26 Jr Ducks Runtso v. Jr Ducks SQ BB (1)  Jr Ducks (Runtso) by 8   
Nov 26 Jr Ducks EK v. Jr Kings                        Jr Kings by 1   
Nov 26 Wave Ontario v. Bears                         Bears by 3   
Nov 26 Jr Ducks Runtso v. Jr Kings                 Jr Kings by 2   
Nov 26 Jr Ducks EK v. Wave Ontario               Jr Ducks (EK) by 6   
Nov 26 Jr Ducks SQ BB (1) v. Bears                Bears by 7   
Nov 26 Ice Dogs v. Jr Gulls                            Jr Gulls by 2                        Semi-Final

Nov 27 Jr Coyotes Fritsche v. Wave Artesia      Jr Coyotes by 1                   Semi-Final
Nov 27 Nevada Storm v. Jr Gulls                    Jr Gulls by 1                        Championship
Nov 27 Jr Kings v. Bears                               Jr Kings by 4                        Semi-Final
Nov 27 Jr Ducks EK v. Jr Ducks Runtso           Jr Ducks (Runtso) by 1         Semi-Final
Nov 27 Jr Kings v. Jr Ducks Runtso                Jr Kings by 1                        Championship
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 22, 2016, 01:06:02 PM
My goodness you've been busy!!!  Very impressive!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on November 22, 2016, 01:18:49 PM
I give that spread a thumbs up!   That definitely took some time to get straight.   
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 22, 2016, 01:25:25 PM
On what site can we start placing our bets. Can we also hedge our bets or parlay them.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Rainman on November 22, 2016, 02:11:03 PM
i'll put my money on Krivo winning AZ.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on November 22, 2016, 02:58:27 PM
I see the humor, I just would've never said that about a club I'm affiliated with, especially on a public form. What message does that send.


No message being sent, except for maybe that at the end of day, it's still just a game being played by 10 year olds and that we can sit back and laugh about it.  Lighten up, Francis.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 22, 2016, 03:08:32 PM
Lol, ok. We look forward to playing you guys Friday morning.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 22, 2016, 04:20:27 PM
i'll put my money on Krivo winning AZ.

I had bad info, I thought Krivo '07s were playing but looks like '06s.  I have made change and agree they will win.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: bobbyrobby on November 22, 2016, 05:52:51 PM
I see the humor, I just would've never said that about a club I'm affiliated with, especially on a public form. What message does that send.


Funny, Tommy the Bomber doesn't remember what he said about his own coach (EK) and club on this same forum. Although it seems Tommy is on EK's Ducks 2, he doesn't even know the makeup of the team and openly criticizes the coach. I question whether Tommy actually has a kid on that team.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on November 22, 2016, 09:37:49 PM
Money up for grabs ...:
Jr gulls and Jr kings not even close they both will not make the finals
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 22, 2016, 10:20:34 PM
Money up for grabs ...:
Jr gulls and Jr kings not even close they both will not make the finals


Funny...


Who are your picks?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 22, 2016, 10:25:05 PM
Bear71, is your son the President of the soft club?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 23, 2016, 07:37:13 AM
Money up for grabs ...:
Jr gulls and Jr kings not even close they both will not make the finals


Kings will definitely be in Finals and likely win unless all the parents accidentally go to the wrong rink. Gulls will likely be in Finals, will have their hands full with Nevada Storm. I might even take the Storm, which is why the line is 1.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on November 23, 2016, 11:36:16 AM
Bear71, is your son the President of the soft club?


He's a cabinet member, but c'mon TTB, everyone knows it always starts with the goalie.  ;)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 23, 2016, 03:11:11 PM
Bear71, we will see Friday morning when we play each other.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on November 23, 2016, 03:54:53 PM
Hate to break the news to you, but contrary to popular belief, I won't be lacing them up, TTB.  Here's to a more competitive game than the last one "we" played.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 23, 2016, 03:58:34 PM
Our kids, but i didn't realize that i had to spell it out. Even though I play once a week my son is still better than me.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 26, 2016, 07:34:10 PM
I heard there were some excited Bears parents yesterday when Ducks EK played the Bears.  What happened?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on November 26, 2016, 08:11:05 PM
Anaheim tourney....


Jr Kings 07 superstars look flat honeymoon is over all teams have caught up - game over
EK Jr Ducks starting to put things together and peaking
Runtso Jr Ducks starting to gel needs more work but getting closer
Bears playing better each game
Wave well it's the Wave


The tourney next week will be a real treat!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 26, 2016, 08:51:34 PM
It looks like both the Ducks have the Kings number. At least they beat our BB team. Tomorrow after we beat the Bears, we look forward to playing the Ducks 1 in the finals. Their going to beat the Kings, at least the Kings can go home early and rest for next weekend.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on November 26, 2016, 08:52:29 PM
Anybody see the final score of the EK Ducks/OWave game? the tournament site seems to be down.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 26, 2016, 08:53:41 PM
It was 5-5.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on November 26, 2016, 08:54:19 PM
Anybody see the final score of the EK Ducks/OWave game? the tournament site seems to be down.




5 to 5 tie.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Richard Cranium on November 26, 2016, 08:56:16 PM
Oh so the website wasn't a incorrect score they posted... that score really did happen... wow!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 26, 2016, 08:58:18 PM
Regardless, of that score last i checked when it was up, was that we were still in first. But maybe it crashed before you guys saw that.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on November 26, 2016, 09:03:18 PM
Wow I guess it's back up just saw the box score.  Tied the winless last place team and they are "peaking."  Interesting take.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Richard Cranium on November 26, 2016, 09:04:57 PM
With the lineup changes the kings make I think they'll do just fine tomorrow
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 26, 2016, 09:05:20 PM
It looks like both the Ducks have the Kings number. At least they beat our BB team. Tomorrow after we beat the Bears, we look forward to playing the Ducks 1 in the finals. Their going to beat the Kings, at least the Kings can go home early and rest for next weekend.

I'll be sure to check back in after tomorrow TTB...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 26, 2016, 09:08:15 PM
If you guys want I can give you the website to watch the finals from your couches if you'd like. We would hate for you to have to drive back to O.C. just to watch us play against each other.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 26, 2016, 09:11:03 PM
Richard Cranium, are you coaching Tomorrow? Or did they ask you what they should do with the line up.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Richard Cranium on November 26, 2016, 09:12:52 PM
Don't need a coach to understand what needs to be done...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on November 26, 2016, 09:13:45 PM
I heard we are going to hire a few kids from the Artesia wave....oh wait, no that's the Ducks that is doing that
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 26, 2016, 09:17:00 PM
Ok, we will see what happens tomorrow. By 10:00 we will know whos playing at 4:00pm. I hope you enjoy being a spectator. Hire who you want, that won't help. Age and experience will always beat youth and luck.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Richard Cranium on November 26, 2016, 09:21:37 PM
Arnt we all spectators? Unless youre playing tomorrow
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 26, 2016, 09:24:19 PM
If you guys get there early enough, our game starts at 7am. You can come sit in the bleachers with me. I will be sitting on the top row with my Ducks jacket on.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 26, 2016, 09:25:49 PM
Ok, we will see what happens tomorrow. By 10:00 we will know whos playing at 4:00pm. I hope you enjoy being a spectator. Hire who you want, that won't help. Age and experience will always beat youth and luck.

Luck?  Easy tiger.  Considering Ducks EK only put up twelve shots, I would call the four shots put past the non-starting goalie pretty lucky.  Things sure seemed to change after that as the Kings outscored the Quacks in periods two/three 4-1.  Maybe spotting four goals didn't help...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 26, 2016, 09:29:15 PM
Disco Daisy, maybe get past the Ducks 1 and than you can chime in.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Richard Cranium on November 26, 2016, 09:31:02 PM
Getting pretty late Tommy, you guys have an early game tomorrow and you need your rest
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 26, 2016, 09:31:32 PM
Disco Daisy, maybe get past the Ducks 1 and than you can chime in.

I'm sorry TTB, you guys are in the finals already?  Maybe those four goals and subsequent pulling of the goalie hits close to home...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on November 26, 2016, 09:31:35 PM
Where are the EK 06 Ducks from Squirt A gonna play next week? I'm just curious .. Doesn't EK already have a real 06 team?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 26, 2016, 09:34:15 PM
I think based on the season so far it's safe to say the Kings will get a rematch with Ducks EK in the Rinks final.  One win doesn't indicate the Ducks Runtso are now better than the Kings.

Gulls and IDs are looking strong, Wave Artesia are strong but Krivo are just a bit stronger.

Looks like my predictions for tourney winners are all still in play and have high probability of being correct.  8)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 26, 2016, 09:43:47 PM
Goalie_dad, do you know who's in the playoffs for tge tge other tournaments. I can update you on the score for the Ducks 1 vs Ducks 2 finals tomorrow at about 5:30
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 26, 2016, 09:53:13 PM
Goalie_dad, do you know who's in the playoffs for tge tge other tournaments. I can update you on the score for the Ducks 1 vs Ducks 2 finals tomorrow at about 5:30

TTB, you're still quacking?  Don't lay an egg tomorrow morning...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 26, 2016, 10:00:27 PM
DD, no need to worry about that. I'm going to be Quacking all the way to the finals. I'm even willing to pay the $10 so you guys can watch finals online. Wouldn't want you to miss the show.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 26, 2016, 10:08:36 PM
DD, no need to worry about that. I'm going to be Quacking all the way to the finals. I'm even willing to pay the $10 so you guys can watch finals online. Wouldn't want you to miss the show.

Considering you didn't get past the Wave, the Bears may have something to say about that.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 26, 2016, 10:18:09 PM
Unless the Bears recruit from their PW AA than that's also a wrap. Just cause you guys struggled with them doesn't mean we will.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 26, 2016, 10:30:34 PM
Unless the Bears recruit from their PW AA than that's also a wrap. Just cause you guys struggled with them doesn't mean we will.

No struggle, just a good game (as you proved today against the Wave).  All of the SQA teams are good when they want to be.  You have provided more than enough bulletin board material for the Bears to answer the call.  I'll be sure to ask how the crow tastes once you lose!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 27, 2016, 04:43:00 AM
Well... everyone needs a good villain... and it looks like we have one in Ducks (EK).
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 27, 2016, 06:09:08 AM
Some call it a Villian I call it a winner!!!! See you in a few gentleman, next year I'm sure I will see a lot more of you guys trying out for the Ducks.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 27, 2016, 09:31:58 AM
I must say... a goalie dad with Ducks jacket was suspiciously missing from the stands today. Hmm...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 27, 2016, 09:40:55 AM
Some call it a Villian I call it a winner!!!! See you in a few gentleman, next year I'm sure I will see a lot more of you guys trying out for the Ducks.

Your hubris almost cost you, TTB.  I was looking for you in the stands to no avail.  I hope you pulled your head out of the sand in time!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on November 27, 2016, 10:12:12 AM
I have to say... given the results today.. Im disappointed at the lack of reading material on this site this morning.   Peculiar.


Have a great rest of your weekend.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on November 27, 2016, 10:20:46 AM
It is 10:10 Disco Dan & Tommy, The Bomber is no where to be heard, thank God! 

PC Bravery, perhaps?

Good luck to all the athletes that are fortunate enough to play in the tournament final & may this blog self implode before they ever get a chance to read it!

TTB, I'll take your $10 CASH since it looked like Jr Kings played their way into the finals also



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: bobbyrobby on November 27, 2016, 10:36:20 AM
Like I said before, Tommy the Bomber probably doesn't even have a kid on the Ducks A2 team. Just likes to run his mouth.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on November 27, 2016, 10:42:10 AM
Like I said before, Tommy the Bomber probably doesn't even have a kid on the Ducks A2 team. Just likes to run his mouth.

Sure likes to run his/her mouth, I mean the computer keyboard, like they are

Fun to read about both 9 & 10 yr old teams that are in the finals, with the exception of TTB.

Jr Ducks seem to be outshooting the Jr Kings in the last few games, guess that is why they play the game?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 27, 2016, 11:37:08 AM
Goalie_dad, do you know who's in the playoffs for tge tge other tournaments. I can update you on the score for the Ducks 1 vs Ducks 2 finals tomorrow at about 5:30

Here is info on other SQA team tournaments.

http://www.thanksgivinghockeytournament.com/page/show/2902356-squirt-u10-elite-2016-thanksgiving-

http://iceplexescondido.hockeyshift.com/stats#/36/schedule?division_id=2314
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 27, 2016, 11:46:53 AM
Goalie_dad, what's the line for the Championship Game this evening?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 27, 2016, 12:00:50 PM
Goalie_dad, what's the line for the Championship Game this evening?

Jr Kings by 1
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on November 27, 2016, 12:19:05 PM
Goalie_dad, what's the line for the Championship Game this evening?

Jr Kings by 1
Welcome back TTB or should we call you the Mystery Keyboard Warrior?

Goalie_dad, thank you again for all your research.  Is that line with TTB Jr in net?  Mystery Keyboard Warrior, will spot me $10 that Disco Dan doesn't need & I'll take the underdogs.

TTB is full of it because Jr Ducks2 are using both goalies not just TTB Jr & getting scoring from alot of different athletes.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on November 27, 2016, 01:00:38 PM
Goalie_dad, what's the line for the Championship Game this evening?

My predictions ....
Tommy the Bomber goes down in the finals - Jr Ducks will lose control of the game .. Jr Kings will roll the lines as dictated by the Jr Kings program although they are struggling... EK will try to play physical......Jr kings will play number 1 goalie .. at the end JK wins by 2 ... Bears should have been in finals
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 27, 2016, 01:05:30 PM

 Bears should have been in finals



Finally something we can all agree on!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: bobbyrobby on November 27, 2016, 01:06:47 PM
Maybe EK will play his 07 goalie.  He's a bit inconsistent (as 9 year olds tend to be), but from what I've heard, when he's on, he's solid.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 27, 2016, 01:29:01 PM
Goalie_dad, if the line is correct we are the underdogs, you are correct about the goalies. We switch at the beginning of the 2nd and depending hows it going.
Behind the Scenes, our kids are told to play tough but clean, Bears played a great game this morning.
Both goalies will platform us today.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 27, 2016, 02:18:22 PM
TTB... you should periscope the game... from the stands... in your Ducks jacket... while your kid plays goalie... because he's on the Ducks (EK)... and you'll certainly be there... at Anaheim Ice... because your kid is playing today... in a hockey game.


But then again... you must be the first Squirt goalie dad to NOT watch the game from right behind your kid along the boards. How odd. Is Eugene wearing a hat today, by the way? Just curious.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 27, 2016, 04:33:23 PM
No updates?!?!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on November 27, 2016, 04:46:56 PM
No updates?!?!
TTB must have gotten caught up in holiday shopping for all of us. You know how long the checkout lines can be this time of year at places like Macy's, BevMo and Costco.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on November 27, 2016, 05:10:03 PM
Kings 6 - TTB 1.  Let the good times roll.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 27, 2016, 05:13:28 PM
No updates?!?!

Pointstreak shows Kings won by 5!!! :o

Wave lost in finals to AZ Bobcats in Phoenix.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 27, 2016, 05:25:34 PM
RIP Tommy the Bomber November 27, 2016
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 27, 2016, 05:35:28 PM
RIP Tommy the Bomber November 27, 2016

Any insight on the game?  Ducks play poorly, Kings play great or both?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 27, 2016, 05:39:37 PM
Oh TTB, where do I begin?  Maybe with the second Honeymoon?  How about the sheer dominant victory?  Better yet, maybe I should start with the running clock Mercy Rule at the close of period two?

Congrats to the Ducks players on a hard-fought game, they earned it.  Again, it just goes to show that all of the Squirt A teams can get streaky.  Congrats to the Kings for the victory that was earned through the entire team playing their minutes.  The NHL Cup should get really interesting!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on November 27, 2016, 05:41:18 PM
Bears must have softened the Ducks up this morning.  Interesting that the refs swallowed their whistles in the semis but found them for the final in a big way.  7 penalties in the final.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on November 27, 2016, 05:46:08 PM
Heard the Jr Kings took it to JR Ducks EK Congrats !!!
NHL cup is next for the 07 kids lucky enough to be invited should be fun to watch
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on November 27, 2016, 06:09:29 PM
RIP Tommy the Bomber November 27, 2016


Ducks got Fleeced.

Any insight on the game?  Ducks play poorly, Kings play great or both?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 27, 2016, 06:44:49 PM
He was wearing a beanie, Kings were the better team and at this point are the better team. I'm at home licking my wounds.  Your goalie was awesome. I'm man enough to admit that we got our asses handed to us and were sent home with our tails in between our legs.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: bobbyrobby on November 27, 2016, 07:28:09 PM
Looks like one kid scored 5 of the Jr Kings 6 goals.  Take that away, you've got a pretty even match up.  Probably just your tail between your legs TTB.  Hopefully the rest of the Jr Ducks team realize it was one game and it doesn't necessarily make Jr Kings the better team.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: trans4761 on November 27, 2016, 07:37:55 PM
Looks like one kid scored 5 of the Jr Kings 6 goals.  Take that away, you've got a pretty even match up.  Probably just your tail between your legs TTB.  Hopefully the rest of the Jr Ducks team realize it was one game and it doesn't necessarily make Jr Kings the better team.
Hate to break it to you, but at this point it does make them a better team.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on November 27, 2016, 07:45:50 PM
Looks like one kid scored 5 of the Jr Kings 6 goals.  Take that away, you've got a pretty even match up.  Probably just your tail between your legs TTB.  Hopefully the rest of the Jr Ducks team realize it was one game and it doesn't necessarily make Jr Kings the better team.


One kid scored 5 goals, but it was by no means a one man show.  It was a complete team effort.... the supporting cast was outstanding. Anyone that walked away thinking it was one kid knows nothing about hockey.  I think there were 2 unassisted goals and only one from the kid with 5. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 27, 2016, 07:57:54 PM
Whoa... look at that stat line. Sounds like TTB will be seeing a Jr. Kings controlled breakout in his nightmares for the next two weeks.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: bobbyrobby on November 27, 2016, 08:06:57 PM
I haven't heard anyone say it was a one man show.  Just looking at the stats.  Jr Ducks A2 have beat the Jr Kings twice? Just saying one win doesn't mean a better team.  Pretty equal with wins/losses when playing each other.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on November 27, 2016, 08:20:40 PM
I haven't heard anyone say it was a one man show.  Just looking at the stats.  Jr Ducks A2 have beat the Jr Kings twice? Just saying one win doesn't mean a better team.  Pretty equal with wins/losses when playing each other.
Jr. Kings have beaten the Ducks 3 times, whats your point?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 27, 2016, 08:33:58 PM
Just Saying, LOL, I can dish it all day plus I can also take it. It will sting for a long time, but life goes on and so does Hockey. Until we meet again you guys will have a lot to say. While I'm napping during the day I will be seeing the Kings crown. I can't even support bobbyrobby after the shalacking we just received.

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 28, 2016, 05:09:37 PM
Goalie_dad, do you have the lines for the NHL World Cup games this weekend.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 28, 2016, 08:01:33 PM
Goalie_dad, do you have the lines for the NHL World Cup games this weekend.

I need to see the Gulls and Ducks rosters.  The other teams are clear who is on the roster.  Once I see the rosters for those two teams I will have lines for the weekend.

Need to update scores from last weekend so I can update rankings as needed, should do that by Wednesday.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 28, 2016, 08:11:20 PM
Goalie_dad, do you have the lines for the NHL World Cup games this weekend.

I need to see the Gulls and Ducks rosters.  The other teams are clear who is on the roster.  Once I see the rosters for those two teams I will have lines for the weekend.

Need to update scores from last weekend so I can update rankings as needed, should do that by Wednesday.


I hope you enjoy your new full time job... because you have officially become indispensable.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 28, 2016, 08:15:10 PM
It gives us stuff to disagree over. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 28, 2016, 08:35:26 PM
Goalie_dad, do you have the lines for the NHL World Cup games this weekend.

I need to see the Gulls and Ducks rosters.  The other teams are clear who is on the roster.  Once I see the rosters for those two teams I will have lines for the weekend.

Need to update scores from last weekend so I can update rankings as needed, should do that by Wednesday.


I hope you enjoy your new full time job... because you have officially become indispensable.

What else am I going to do, listen to my wife ramble on all night lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 28, 2016, 08:48:02 PM
Goalie_dad, were all in the same boat. It's either talk about hockey or discuss what color to paint the kitchen.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 29, 2016, 08:19:16 AM
Goalie_dad, do you have the lines for the NHL World Cup games this weekend.

I need to see the Gulls and Ducks rosters.  The other teams are clear who is on the roster.  Once I see the rosters for those two teams I will have lines for the weekend.

Need to update scores from last weekend so I can update rankings as needed, should do that by Wednesday.


Jr Gulls made no changes to the roster for Thanksgiving and will be the same for all tournaments.   8)

The Jr Gulls roster I need to see is the 2007 roster for the NHL Cup tournament this weekend.  Do the Gulls have an '07 SQ BB team?  My understanding is the SQA team is mostly '06s.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 29, 2016, 11:33:55 AM
Goalie_dad, do you have the lines for the NHL World Cup games this weekend.

I need to see the Gulls and Ducks rosters.  The other teams are clear who is on the roster.  Once I see the rosters for those two teams I will have lines for the weekend.

Need to update scores from last weekend so I can update rankings as needed, should do that by Wednesday.


Jr Gulls made no changes to the roster for Thanksgiving and will be the same for all tournaments.   8)

The Jr Gulls roster I need to see is the 2007 roster for the NHL Cup tournament this weekend.  Do the Gulls have an '07 SQ BB team?  My understanding is the SQA team is mostly '06s.

I remember playing the Gulls 07 team that was in Squirt B as we were in BB last year for their Spring Tournament.  There are a couple of players from that team playing in A currently.  Is that 07 team together or dispersed among levels?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 29, 2016, 11:53:20 AM
Unless some birth certificates can be doctored, I'm guessing Jr. Kings will be pretty heavy favorites this weekend.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 29, 2016, 12:01:02 PM
Unless some birth certificates can be doctored, I'm guessing Jr. Kings will be pretty heavy favorites this weekend.

Dallas is strong as well, my early prediction is Kings v. Dallas in final.  Like I said, depends on the rosters for Ducks and Gulls but not likely to change the final.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 29, 2016, 12:02:40 PM
Ducks look like their bringing some Wave players to join the fun.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 29, 2016, 01:17:56 PM
Ducks look like their bringing some Wave players to join the fun.

You have the Ducks roster for me?  8)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on November 29, 2016, 02:10:49 PM
Predictions ....


Jr Gulls no chance last place
San Jose finish 5th
Phoenix 4th
Jr Ducks 3rd ducks bringing in BB players and Wave looks like a cluster no big 06 to push the physical pace


Dallas vs Jr Kings in the Finals

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 29, 2016, 02:27:08 PM
Here are my predictions.

Dallas wins over Jr Kings in finals.
3rd: Jr Gulls
4th: Jr Ducks
5th: Jr Coyotes
6th: Jr Sharks

12/1/2016   Los Angeles Jr. Kings   Anaheim Jr. Ducks   Los Angeles Jr. Kings v. Anaheim Jr. Ducks   Jr Kings by 3

12/2/2016   Dallas Stars Elite         San Diego Jr. Gulls   Dallas Stars Elite v. San Diego Jr. Gulls        Dallas by 1
12/2/2016   Phoenix Jr. Coyotes     San Jose Jr. Sharks   Phoenix Jr. Coyotes v. San Jose Jr. Sharks   Jr Coyotes by 3
12/2/2016   Phoenix Jr. Coyotes     Dallas Stars Elite       Phoenix Jr. Coyotes v. Dallas Stars Elite       Dallas by 2
12/2/2016   Los Angeles Jr. Kings   San Jose Jr. Sharks   Los Angeles Jr. Kings v. San Jose Jr. Sharks   Jr Kings by 5
12/2/2016   Anaheim Jr. Ducks      San Diego Jr. Gulls    Anaheim Jr. Ducks v. San Diego Jr. Gulls       Jr Gulls by 3

12/3/2016   San Diego Jr. Gulls     Los Angeles Jr. Kings   San Diego Jr. Gulls v. Los Angeles Jr. Kings   Jr Kings by 1
12/3/2016   San Jose Jr. Sharks     Dallas Stars Elite        San Jose Jr. Sharks v. Dallas Stars Elite         Dallas by 4
12/3/2016   Anaheim Jr. Ducks       Phoenix Jr. Coyotes   Anaheim Jr. Ducks v. Phoenix Jr. Coyotes      Jr Ducks by 1
12/3/2016   Los Angeles Jr. Kings   Dallas Stars Elite       Los Angeles Jr. Kings v. Dallas Stars Elite       Dallas by 1
12/3/2016   San Jose Jr. Sharks     Anaheim Jr. Ducks     San Jose Jr. Sharks v. Anaheim Jr. Ducks       Jr Ducks by 2
12/3/2016   San Diego Jr. Gulls      Phoenix Jr. Coyotes   San Diego Jr. Gulls v. Phoenix Jr. Coyotes       Jr Gulls by 3

12/4/2016   Los Angeles Jr. Kings   Phoenix Jr. Coyotes   Los Angeles Jr. Kings v. Phoenix Jr. Coyotes    Jr Kings by 4
12/4/2016   Dallas Stars Elite         Anaheim Jr. Ducks    Dallas Stars Elite v. Anaheim Jr. Ducks            Dallas by 3
12/4/2016   San Diego Jr. Gulls      San Jose Jr. Sharks   San Diego Jr. Gulls v. San Jose Jr. Sharks        Jr Gulls by 3
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 29, 2016, 05:20:13 PM
I'll take Jr. Kings for the win... and Ducks finishing ahead of Gulls. While they'll be a mishmash of players, Ducks will have speed and aggression in spades... and that'll make up for their unfamiliarity.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 29, 2016, 05:55:34 PM
I'll take Jr. Kings for the win... and Ducks finishing ahead of Gulls. While they'll be a mishmash of players, Ducks will have speed and aggression in spades... and that'll make up for their unfamiliarity.

I think Dallas/Kings could go either way, it will be close.

As far as Ducks, I just don't know who is playing to pick them over the Gulls.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 29, 2016, 09:53:26 PM
In the past has the winner from the East played the winner of the West?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 29, 2016, 11:34:39 PM
In the past has the winner from the East played the winner of the West?


Don't think so.


As for the Gulls, most of those kids on the SQWA team are 06, which means most their kids on 07 team will be BB, while most Ducks will be SQWA (including Wave ringers). Gulls won't be able to hang with the speed and skill over the whole game. You know how it goes. Could be wrong, but some of those 07 Ducks can really skate.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 30, 2016, 12:30:12 AM
In the past has the winner from the East played the winner of the West?


Don't think so.


As for the Gulls, most of those kids on the SQWA team are 06, which means most their kids on 07 team will be BB, while most Ducks will be SQWA (including Wave ringers). Gulls won't be able to hang with the speed and skill over the whole game. You know how it goes. Could be wrong, but some of those 07 Ducks can really skate.

The NHL Cup site has a roster for Gulls.

http://nhlyc.stats.pointstreak.com/players-team-roster.html?teamid=636595&seasonid=15916
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 30, 2016, 07:03:58 AM
In the past has the winner from the East played the winner of the West?


Don't think so.


As for the Gulls, most of those kids on the SQWA team are 06, which means most their kids on 07 team will be BB, while most Ducks will be SQWA (including Wave ringers). Gulls won't be able to hang with the speed and skill over the whole game. You know how it goes. Could be wrong, but some of those 07 Ducks can really skate.

The NHL Cup site has a roster for Gulls.

http://nhlyc.stats.pointstreak.com/players-team-roster.html?teamid=636595&seasonid=15916 (http://nhlyc.stats.pointstreak.com/players-team-roster.html?teamid=636595&seasonid=15916)


Well, that's their entire SQWA team. Pretty sure they're not all 07... but if they're playing, they'll roll.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on November 30, 2016, 09:22:42 AM
So who enters a mostly 06 team (Jr. Gulls) into an 07 tournament?  Isn't there an 06 one in Dallas?  I wonder if that's why there is not playoff or championship? 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 30, 2016, 09:43:22 AM
Perhaps they were asked to play since there aren't that many teams in the West? And, if I'm not mistaken, the Gulls are an AHL team... so them being there doesn't even make sense to begin. Their 07 BB teams wouldn't be competitive, so perhaps they figured "what the heck." 


And to be fair, the Jr. Kings did just sent their PWAA 06/05 team to the Drew Doughty London Jr Knights tournament and put them in the 06 Major division... even though half their team are 05s.   
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 30, 2016, 09:48:33 AM
It will be interesting to see the roster for the Ducks once it's available.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 30, 2016, 09:51:29 AM
My guess is that there just are not enough teams in the "West".  It will make some of those games more competitive.  Still think Dallas and Kings beat the Gulls but those will be close games between those three teams.

I did see the Ducks roster is up and that is a good group of kids, just think they are a group of individuals and will not play as a team.  Just like the California Brick teams...

I am sticking by my predictions.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on November 30, 2016, 09:54:08 AM
Goalie_dad, can you post the link of the Ducks roster?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on November 30, 2016, 10:01:28 AM
Not too many surprises.  Guess we all knew about the Wave kids.  Otherwise, SQA Ducks kids and a few SQ BB Ducks kids.

http://nhlyc.stats.pointstreak.com/players-team-roster.html?teamid=636590&seasonid=15916
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockeyking on November 30, 2016, 02:06:43 PM
Just looked at the Duck rooster and its stronger than I thought. I think if EK keeps the lines from each team consistant (Duck EK play with Duck EK, Duck Runtso plays with Duck Runtso, wave plays with Wave) they might have a chance. Looks like they have the top line from each team with a few BB boys mixed in. Should be interesting.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 30, 2016, 03:05:47 PM
Just looked at the Duck rooster and its stronger than I thought. I think if EK keeps the lines from each team consistant (Duck EK play with Duck EK, Duck Runtso plays with Duck Runtso, wave plays with Wave) they might have a chance. Looks like they have the top line from each team with a few BB boys mixed in. Should be interesting.


Yeah, I was thinking that as well.  However, I always wondered why EK didn't do that with the '06 Brick team (ex. Ducks line, ID line, etc.). I guess it's never as simple as that, as a few kids didn't even go because of him, but that would seemed to have expedited any chemistry problems.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on November 30, 2016, 03:08:14 PM
My guess is that there just are not enough teams in the "West".  It will make some of those games more competitive.  Still think Dallas and Kings beat the Gulls but those will be close games between those three teams.

I did see the Ducks roster is up and that is a good group of kids, just think they are a group of individuals and will not play as a team.  Just like the California Brick teams...

I am sticking by my predictions.


Just looked at Jr Ducks Roster for NHL Cup at least 5 kids are individual players trying to pad their own stats and you have an end to ender playing D .... some of these kids will be considered for Alberta. Haven't we learned from the past? individuals players don't do well against strong, fast teams ..... good luck to all the teams including the 06 Jr Gulls ....remind me why they call it an 07 Tournament? Are the games being streamed live? Would be nice to watch a few games...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 30, 2016, 06:08:53 PM
Perhaps they were asked to play since there aren't that many teams in the West? And, if I'm not mistaken, the Gulls are an AHL team... so them being there doesn't even make sense to begin. Their 07 BB teams wouldn't be competitive, so perhaps they figured "what the heck." 


And to be fair, the Jr. Kings did just sent their PWAA 06/05 team to the Drew Doughty London Jr Knights tournament and put them in the 06 Major division... even though half their team are 05s.

Kings only took three 05s to the Doughty Tournament.  While I agree with your point, taking an entire 06 team with two 07s is a bit ridiculous.  The Gulls 07 team plus their A players would be competitive, just may not be as strong as the Kings, Ducks, or Stars.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 30, 2016, 07:07:49 PM
Perhaps they were asked to play since there aren't that many teams in the West? And, if I'm not mistaken, the Gulls are an AHL team... so them being there doesn't even make sense to begin. Their 07 BB teams wouldn't be competitive, so perhaps they figured "what the heck." 


And to be fair, the Jr. Kings did just sent their PWAA 06/05 team to the Drew Doughty London Jr Knights tournament and put them in the 06 Major division... even though half their team are 05s.

Kings only took three 05s to the Doughty Tournament.  While I agree with your point, taking an entire 06 team with two 07s is a bit ridiculous.  The Gulls 07 team plus their A players would be competitive, just may not be as strong as the Kings, Ducks, or Stars.


No. They took 8 05s and a goalie to London. Check the roster. Majority of that team is 05.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 30, 2016, 07:54:32 PM
Perhaps they were asked to play since there aren't that many teams in the West? And, if I'm not mistaken, the Gulls are an AHL team... so them being there doesn't even make sense to begin. Their 07 BB teams wouldn't be competitive, so perhaps they figured "what the heck." 


And to be fair, the Jr. Kings did just sent their PWAA 06/05 team to the Drew Doughty London Jr Knights tournament and put them in the 06 Major division... even though half their team are 05s.

Kings only took three 05s to the Doughty Tournament.  While I agree with your point, taking an entire 06 team with two 07s is a bit ridiculous.  The Gulls 07 team plus their A players would be competitive, just may not be as strong as the Kings, Ducks, or Stars.


No. They took 8 05s and a goalie to London. Check the roster. Majority of that team is 05.

I didn't realize that Kings had that many 05s in London.  I still don't think bringing an 06 team to an 07 tournament when you have an 07 team is okay.  Kings 06 birthyear is all over the place.  Gulls have a solid team that should be allowed to participate  (just like the Ducks).  I'm glad to see the Ducks pulled up BBS to help out!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on November 30, 2016, 08:03:49 PM
we should make the 06's wear 10lb weight vests
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on November 30, 2016, 08:08:18 PM
we should make the 06's wear 10lb weight vests


Don't worry, the 06s still playing SQWA already skate like they're wearing 10lb weight vests.  :o
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 30, 2016, 08:28:26 PM
we should make the 06's wear 10lb weight vests


Don't worry, the 06s still playing SQWA already skate like they're wearing 10lb weight vests.  :o

Ha!  Regardless, it should be a good tournament.  Good luck to all!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on November 30, 2016, 09:59:49 PM
Perhaps they were asked to play since there aren't that many teams in the West? And, if I'm not mistaken, the Gulls are an AHL team... so them being there doesn't even make sense to begin. Their



I didn't realize that Kings had that many 05s in London.  I still don't think bringing an 06 team to an 07 tournament when you have an 07 team is okay.  Kings 06 birthyear is all over the place.  Gulls have a solid team that should be allowed to participate  (just like the Ducks).  I'm glad to see the Ducks pulled up BBS to help out!


I still don't think bringing an 06 team to an 07 tournament when you have an 07 team is okay.


It's my understanding that the Gulls were asked to play in the tournament. They did not seek it out.  Also they are not an all 06 team, it's about a 50-50 split with one 08.


All of the top SCAHA Squirt A teams are very close in skill level, despite birth year breakdowns, so it should be very
competitive and fun for everyone.   8) 

I agree with what you're saying for the most part, especially about the competition.  This age issue is slightly different though because the Gulls should be going in as a favorite (last time I checked the SCAHA standings they were atop or near the top of SQA) and have a legit shot to win.  The Kings were not a favorite in London.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: SilkyMitts on December 01, 2016, 08:39:08 AM
we should make the 06's wear 10lb weight vests


Don't worry, the 06s still playing SQWA already skate like they're wearing 10lb weight vests.  :o


It absolutely amazes me to listen to adults ramble on about 9 and 10 year old kids, when it is likely that most if not ALL of you have never played a sport past high school or perhaps never even made a varsity team in their lives.  I can assure that I have played the sport at a much higher level than anyone in this discussion and I would never talk about young athletes the way you people do.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on December 01, 2016, 09:05:00 AM
we should make the 06's wear 10lb weight vests


Don't worry, the 06s still playing SQWA already skate like they're wearing 10lb weight vests.  :o


It absolutely amazes me to listen to adults ramble on about 9 and 10 year old kids, when it is likely that most if not ALL of you have never played a sport past high school or perhaps never even made a varsity team in their lives.  I can assure that I have played the sport at a much higher level than anyone in this discussion and I would never talk about young athletes the way you people do.


funny .... have you tried maybe joining a discussion thread that suits more your values? Toughen up .... The simple fact that you are here reading the thread proves that some of these conversations peeked your curiosity and serves for us arm chair quarterbacks some sort of stress relief and enjoyment and entertainment ..... perhaps you might consider joining this Chicago 2017 Brick thread for more entertainment http://www.network54.com/Forum/755318/thread/1476738815/last-1480567345/2017+Brick+Team
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on December 01, 2016, 09:16:00 AM
we should make the 06's wear 10lb weight vests


Don't worry, the 06s still playing SQWA already skate like they're wearing 10lb weight vests.  :o



It absolutely amazes me to listen to adults ramble on about 9 and 10 year old kids, when it is likely that most if not ALL of you have never played a sport past high school or perhaps never even made a varsity team in their lives.  I can assure that I have played the sport at a much higher level than anyone in this discussion and I would never talk about young athletes the way you people do.


Lighten up Francis - it's called a joke.   I know multiple people that are on here that played college and or pro sports.  Get over yourself. Also does beer league hockey count as playing a sport past high school?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 01, 2016, 09:20:20 AM
we should make the 06's wear 10lb weight vests


Don't worry, the 06s still playing SQWA already skate like they're wearing 10lb weight vests.  :o


It absolutely amazes me to listen to adults ramble on about 9 and 10 year old kids, when it is likely that most if not ALL of you have never played a sport past high school or perhaps never even made a varsity team in their lives.  I can assure that I have played the sport at a much higher level than anyone in this discussion and I would never talk about young athletes the way you people do.


I think half the board wrote "lighten up" at the same time.  :D


We all love the sport, support our kids endlessly, and like to have fun doing it. Simple as that.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on December 01, 2016, 10:13:27 AM
If the gulls win the 07 tournament, how do they communicate that to the club?  "Congrats to the 06 Jr. Gulls!"  "Way to take it those 07 kids!"  On another note, word is out regarding the Ducks selection process.  Some very unhappy Duck 07 parents......
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 01, 2016, 10:15:24 AM
we should make the 06's wear 10lb weight vests


Don't worry, the 06s still playing SQWA already skate like they're wearing 10lb weight vests.  :o


It absolutely amazes me to listen to adults ramble on about 9 and 10 year old kids, when it is likely that most if not ALL of you have never played a sport past high school or perhaps never even made a varsity team in their lives.  I can assure that I have played the sport at a much higher level than anyone in this discussion and I would never talk about young athletes the way you people do.


I think half the board wrote "lighten up" at the same time.  :D


We all love the sport, support our kids endlessly, and like to have fun doing it. Simple as that.


I don't have an answer for that. 


And "Lighten up, Francis" is my copyrighted line.  Royalties can be paid directly to the Reseda Ice Project Fund (circa 2032).
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 01, 2016, 08:05:25 PM
Whoa!  Tight one in Anaheim. They should keep that '07 Ducks team together.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 01, 2016, 08:14:11 PM
It wasn't that tight, and I'm a Ducks fan through and through. Unfortunately the Kings dominated the game from the get go. The margin should of been 3. They let in some silly goals. Ducks had to many chiefs and no indians. Unfortunately one of Kings kids got hurt, the Ref blew that call. They should have put that kid out. It was a dangerous play. Hopefully the young man will be ok.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 01, 2016, 08:27:19 PM
Well, selfish play is to be expected from a team thrown together for a long weekend. But the Ducks lost by a goal and outshot them 21-18. But not tight?

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 01, 2016, 08:47:03 PM
Just Saying, at what point was it tight? At 3-1, 4-2, or when they pulled the goalie and scored while it was 6 on 4? Out shooting a team doesnt matter if you cant aim. Either way the 2007 Brick Team just lost their 1st game to the Kings. Lol but most importantly lets hope the kid is ok. Goalie_dad prediction is still accurate.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 01, 2016, 08:59:32 PM
Official Hawaiian Gardens Casino line:
12/1/2016   Los Angeles Jr. Kings   Anaheim Jr. Ducks   Los Angeles Jr. Kings v. Anaheim Jr. Ducks   Jr Kings by 3

The line was 3... but the outcome was 1! Seems kinda tight to me... but I wasn't there, so if you say it wasn't as close as it seemed (although aren't SOG "well aimed" by definition?), then I trust you.  Regardless, looks like a good start to the tournament. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 01, 2016, 09:24:17 PM
I guess the 2007 Brick Team took its 1st loss. Maybe they should reconsider who they really want on that team, cause that experiment sure as hell didn't work. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 01, 2016, 09:32:20 PM
Wanna talk not tight, look at the stat line for the 03 game. 5-0 Kings... and Kings outshot Ducks 42-6. That Kings team is rough.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Ziegler on December 01, 2016, 09:37:47 PM
I guess the ducks goalie parents got their money's worth. not sure how it shook down but that goalie must have been busy.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on December 02, 2016, 12:02:34 AM
How about auctioning some Duck soup .....lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 02, 2016, 12:12:58 AM
I expected better from the Kings.  They have been playing together for a while now and played a "Ducks" team just thrown together in the last few weeks.  "Ducks" obviously have talent but Kings should have won by a few goals at least.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Behind the Scenes on December 02, 2016, 12:48:49 AM
Goalie dad were you able to watch the game? ... I was able to tune in so let me throw some stuff at you ....Olympic ice .... at no point did the Jr Ducks ever dominate, they had to switch their top goalie for a BB player pretty embarrassing, Jr kings looked flat, that's a good sign for the rest of us... horrible refs and a Jr Ducks loss ..keep counting those L as the weekend goes on ... the Jr Ducks trying to throw a huge BRICK in front of a Jr kings freight train to showcase talent that just isn't there ...... choo choo!!! Let's all join the Jr Ducks Brick 07 team with a WAVE salute!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 02, 2016, 07:01:11 AM
LOL, it will be an interesting tournament to say the least.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on December 02, 2016, 07:25:39 AM
I expected better from the Kings.  They have been playing together for a while now and played a "Ducks" team just thrown together in the last few weeks.  "Ducks" obviously have talent but Kings should have won by a few goals at least.


Final Score:
Kings 7
Wave 4
Ducks 2
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 02, 2016, 08:10:48 AM
BobbyOrr, that's a great breakdown!!!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 02, 2016, 08:30:35 AM
BobbyOrr, so what your really trying to say is that.
Waves 4 + Ducks 2 = 6 Goals
Kings = 7 Goals
So 6 Goals ÷ By Ducks & Waves = 3
So it looks like the Kings really covered the spread.
Common Core Math is the best.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 02, 2016, 08:31:55 AM
I expected better from the Kings.  They have been playing together for a while now and played a "Ducks" team just thrown together in the last few weeks.  "Ducks" obviously have talent but Kings should have won by a few goals at least.


Final Score:
Kings 7
Wave 4
Ducks 2

That's why I used quotes.  Still Kings chemistry should have produce better win. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on December 02, 2016, 09:00:44 AM
BobbyOrr, so what your really trying to say is that.
Waves 4 + Ducks 2 = 6 Goals
Kings = 7 Goals
So 6 Goals ÷ By Ducks & Waves = 3
So it looks like the Kings really covered the spread.
Common Core Math is the best.

That's hilarious
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 02, 2016, 09:08:33 AM
BobbyOrr, so what your really trying to say is that.
Waves 4 + Ducks 2 = 6 Goals
Kings = 7 Goals
So 6 Goals ÷ By Ducks & Waves = 3
So it looks like the Kings really covered the spread.
Common Core Math is the best.

Good analysis TTB!  This is awesome!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on December 02, 2016, 09:12:13 AM
BobbyOrr, so what your really trying to say is that.
Waves 4 + Ducks 2 = 6 Goals
Kings = 7 Goals
So 6 Goals ÷ By Ducks & Waves = 3
So it looks like the Kings really covered the spread.
Common Core Math is the best.

Good analysis TTB!  This is awesome!!!


Great analysis:  Don't forget the 1 goal for the ref!  Ducks kid kicked in the first one, but unfortunately the 3rd ref was still in the restroom! 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 02, 2016, 09:30:02 AM
Dallas Stars Elite 1    San Diego Jr. Gulls 2   

Based on this, I am thinking the Gulls will win all their games.  The Dallas team is a good team...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 02, 2016, 09:42:57 AM
Goalie_dad, so are you readjusting your prediction since the new development with the Gulls and Stars. After the last update on the Ducks Kings game. I had to use my Texas Instrument Calculator for the average. So the Ducks really scored 2.5 goals in that game.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 02, 2016, 10:26:29 AM
Dallas Stars Elite 1    San Diego Jr. Gulls 2   

Based on this, I am thinking the Gulls will win all their games.  The Dallas team is a good team...

Did you see there were 12 penalties? Yikes. A penalty is a penalty, but that's too much. I mean, you could call a tripping or slashing or hooking penalty pretty much every time up and down the ice in a SQW game. I wish the refs would just relax a bit, let them play, and only call the blatant stuff. Nothing more annoying than ticky-tack penalties. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockeyking on December 02, 2016, 11:32:55 AM
I'm not following anyone's logic regarding the Duck/Wave breakdown. Last time I checked, hockey was a team sport. Plays revolve around the whole line not just who got the goal and as we all know sometimes the whole play was started by the kid who doesn't get the goal or the assist. I'm not saying the Wave players didn't look great, they did and most shifts they did carry the line but there were also three other players on the ice contributing. To say the Ducks only scored 2 goals would only be true if there were no Duck players on the ice when the Wave players scored their goals. For a team without any play prior to yesterday, they didn't look that bad. The Jr. Kings kids should be disaapointed with the game, to be together for as long as they have to have such a close game is tough. They looked fast but I truthfully haven't seen the improvement from preseason that I have with some of the other SCHA teams. JMO
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockeymomx on December 02, 2016, 03:30:21 PM
Gulls 4 Ducks 3.  Game winner was scored with less than a minute left.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on December 02, 2016, 08:28:00 PM
Gulls 4 Ducks 3.  Game winner was scored with less than a minute left.


Wow, another disappointing win against the ducks. First the kings, now the gulls.  I hope the kings and gulls can bounce back for tomorrow morning's game.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on December 02, 2016, 08:33:46 PM
I'm not following anyone's logic regarding the Duck/Wave breakdown. Last time I checked, hockey was a team sport. Plays revolve around the whole line not just who got the goal and as we all know sometimes the whole play was started by the kid who doesn't get the goal or the assist. I'm not saying the Wave players didn't look great, they did and most shifts they did carry the line but there were also three other players on the ice contributing. To say the Ducks only scored 2 goals would only be true if there were no Duck players on the ice when the Wave players scored their goals. For a team without any play prior to yesterday, they didn't look that bad. The Jr. Kings kids should be disaapointed with the game, to be together for as long as they have to have such a close game is tough. They looked fast but I truthfully haven't seen the improvement from preseason that I have with some of the other SCHA teams. JMO

The logic is pretty simple, EK is double and triple shifting the Wave line and sometimes the Ducks A line.  Ducks parents in the organization are rightfully upset with this type of decision making.  It sends a horrible message to the parents (as previously stated) and makes it look like the Ducks cabinets are bare (which we know isn't true).  There's a reason they're 0-2 and it's not for lack of talent...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 02, 2016, 10:07:45 PM
BobbyOrr & Disco Dan, look at the bright at least they covered the spread in both games. Someone made money. I actually think the Jr. Kings should be the 2007 Brick team and than add some players from other teams. They one thing the Kings do exceptionally well is move the puck. That's what a lot of teams are missing.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 03, 2016, 12:09:37 AM
Looks like Ducks had scoring but not as strong on defense based on shot totals from the Gulls game.  Most likely the Brick team will be primarily made up of kids on the "Ducks" and Kings.  They will need stronger goaltending as the defense will not be strong.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 03, 2016, 07:59:21 AM
Let give everyone the link for the Live Stream. Coronadoproductions.com
Let me start by saying im glad the Kings haven't improved, cause if they havent reached their ceiling we are all in trouble. They are better than the Gulls and the Gulls are really good.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockeymomx on December 03, 2016, 10:44:46 AM
Jr Ducks 11 Jr Coyotes 3
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 03, 2016, 11:19:03 AM
Brick Team got it's 1st win. Congrats, now let's see if they can muster up one more win today to get to .500.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 03, 2016, 01:59:39 PM
Looks like SoCal (San Diego is SoCal, right?) is crushing it. Hey, how come no teams from Canada? Jr. Canucks have something else to do this weekend?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Ziegler on December 03, 2016, 03:37:55 PM
 I don't believe there is a jr Canucks team during the season. Just made up for brick only. Also BC hockey region places kids on teams based on your home address not where you want to go. Kids are forced to play for a specific team until spring when they are released and can join all star squads.  That's why cali teams that like to travel to BC wait until the season is over and vice versa.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 03, 2016, 05:25:56 PM
So I guess the two top teams are the Jr. Kings in 1st with a record of 4-0 and the Jr. Gulls in 2nd at 3-1. Kings are looking to go 5-0 for the Tournament when they play the Phoenix Coyotes tomorrow morning. Their either some of the luckiest kids or that group of misfits are actually talented. Two straight banners, two consecutive weekends.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 03, 2016, 06:00:35 PM
So I guess the two top teams are the Jr. Kings in 1st with a record of 4-0 and the Jr. Gulls in 2nd at 3-1. Kings are looking to go 5-0 for the Tournament when they play the Phoenix Coyotes tomorrow morning. Their either some of the luckiest kids or that group of misfits are actually talented. Two straight banners, two consecutive weekends.

Kings are obviously talented.

I was surprised how poorly Dallas played, they are ranked high on Myhockeyrankings (top 20 I think and Kings are 15 I think).

Ducks did decent.  They played the best 2 teams close, 1 goal loses.  The blow outs are not much to read into, they were not against starting goalies it looked like.

I would expect Brick will be mixture of Kings and "Ducks".  No Gulls, Sharks or Coyotes stood out enough to impress EK I would think.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 03, 2016, 06:14:05 PM
Goalie_dad, it will be interesting to see who is named as the Brick HC. If it's EK I would expect 85% to be Ducks. If it's someone else it may be more balanced. Either way I don't have a horse in that race.
.500 for the Ducks isn't decent with that much talent, the two teams they beat with that lineup were expected. They recruited from outside to beat the Kings and Gulls and didn't accomplish either one. Some will say that they only lost by 1 in each game, but at the end of the Tournament I think it still shows up as a loss!!!!! Maybe next time they will get some players that can ply together and share in the sandbox. We've been off for two weeks now, we look forward to playing again next weekend.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on December 04, 2016, 08:52:13 AM
Kings defeated Phoenix 8-0 to claim the NHL Youth Cup.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 04, 2016, 03:46:43 PM
Goalie_dad, since all the games are done for everyone what's the line for next week. How were your predictions for the other Tournaments.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on December 04, 2016, 09:03:17 PM
Its eerily quiet in here.   Didn't anyone have anything good or bad to say about the past weekend?   Hmmm.. peculiar.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: nuffsed on December 04, 2016, 10:37:41 PM
how awful would that have been had an 06 team won the tournament?  someone claimed 1/2 07's 1/2 06's. yet we over heard conversations around the RINK TWO 07's the rest 06's.


I believe the Jr Kings took the tournament after the Jr Gulls win over the Jr Coyotes Saturday. glad the smaller Jr Kings goalie got to play in the NHL Youth Cup.  They must've been worried about a come back because BIG TWO FIVE finished out the game.


Too bad the NHL Youth Cup team the Jr Ducks put together wasn't their actual team. they began to gel well after dropping the 1st 2 games.


Good luck to all SoCal teams these final 2 weeks before the Break.  Anybody playing Christmas tournaments near or far?



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 04, 2016, 11:06:52 PM
The Gulls also have an 08.


Both Goalies for the Kings played exceptionally well, and their defense was lights out, than add their speed and offensive players. Their a fine oiled machine.


The Ducks played well against the weakest teams, that's not gelling, that's just bad competition, if they wanted some credit they should've beat the Gulls or the Kings.

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 05, 2016, 07:49:36 AM
Its eerily quiet in here.   Didn't anyone have anything good or bad to say about the past weekend?   Hmmm.. peculiar.

Well, what is there to say? The biggest surprise, perhaps, is the weak competition. SoCal pretty much hammered everyone. That said, the Kings did exactly as many anticipated them to do... but the Kings parents aren't going to gloat... much. The Orange County All Stars formerly known as the Ducks were hit and miss, as anticipated with a thrown together team lacking true chemistry, and the Gulls probably underperformed, considering they sent their intact '06 SQWA team (minus 3 non-06 players).  The biggest discussion point, though... might be "who" will lose the ego and announce a consolidated true '07 team to rival the '07 Kings next year in PWAA?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 05, 2016, 08:18:31 AM
Next year we will play PWA, hopefully the 07 play AA but due to politics and egos that may not happen. Either way unless they learn to trust each other and play as a unit they will always be a runner up to the Kings.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on December 05, 2016, 08:52:33 AM
Tommy - Who's "we?"  Are you referring to the kings or the Ducks? 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 05, 2016, 08:56:35 AM
My son is a 06 and he will play PWA, hes not ready for AA. The Ducks I'm referring to. I don't know about the inner workings of the Kings, I just see that they play well as a unit.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: bobbyrobby on December 05, 2016, 09:45:54 AM
Surprised you feel that way TTB. Your son did well in the Ducks mini 1 on 1 squirt division as goalie, didn't he?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 05, 2016, 09:49:51 AM
We will tryout for AA but has not ready. I'm a realist
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 05, 2016, 10:00:30 AM
A realist would know that PW is watered down. B is basically in-house. BB/A is a hodgepodge of kids that belong there and kids that don't. AA isn't much more consistent.  There will likely be a Ducks PWAA team next year with 07s on it, but the question is if it'll be all 07s or have some 06s like the Kings PWAA 06/05 team this year.  If the Ducks ever want to seriously contend with the 07 Kings, who will get better and better as the years go by, they'll need to make some tough decisions this Spring. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 05, 2016, 10:04:53 AM
I agree with you, but i also know that he will get better by playing more, the Ducks coaches won't be able to put their differences aside, if they could they wouldve this year. And once they pick the coaches for Brick if one is left out it will get even.worse.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockey05 on December 05, 2016, 10:31:37 AM
A realist would know that PW is watered down. B is basically in-house. BB/A is a hodgepodge of kids that belong there and kids that don't. AA isn't much more consistent.  There will likely be a Ducks PWAA team next year with 07s on it, but the question is if it'll be all 07s or have some 06s like the Kings PWAA 06/05 team this year.  If the Ducks ever want to seriously contend with the 07 Kings, who will get better and better as the years go by, they'll need to make some tough decisions this Spring.


No bone to pick in this thread, but Peewee B is peewee B.  If you want to play hockey, you have to start somewhere. 
You mention BB/A is a hodge podge of kids that don't belong there.  Where do they belong then?  Then you write that AA isn't more consistent.  How many games are you watching?  Good teams at AA don't have serious weaknesses and are consistent. 
A piece of advice, get informed before you have little Johnny Hockey skate up.  More than one team has struggled skating up this season and sometimes clubs push kids to skate up to meet tier requirements.  The Kings team you reference has one win in CAHA. 
The only division you haven't mentioned is, AAA.  If you are looking for that, I'm sure you can find it.  Somebody will tell you whatever you want and cash the check. 

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 6607 on December 05, 2016, 11:18:54 AM
It would be very surprising if the Ducks did not have an 07 PW AA team next year.  That's is their paradigm, several Ducks coaches and/or NHL alumni have 07 kids, and over the past few years they have done a much better job than the Kings at recruiting.  The problem for the Ducks is that they have two very good PWA teams, and they cannot have three AA teams.  Best guess is that one of the PWA teams slides over to OCHC to make room for 07 PWAA team.

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 05, 2016, 12:08:20 PM
A realist would know that PW is watered down. B is basically in-house. BB/A is a hodgepodge of kids that belong there and kids that don't. AA isn't much more consistent.  There will likely be a Ducks PWAA team next year with 07s on it, but the question is if it'll be all 07s or have some 06s like the Kings PWAA 06/05 team this year.  If the Ducks ever want to seriously contend with the 07 Kings, who will get better and better as the years go by, they'll need to make some tough decisions this Spring.


No bone to pick in this thread, but Peewee B is peewee B.  If you want to play hockey, you have to start somewhere. 
You mention BB/A is a hodge podge of kids that don't belong there.  Where do they belong then?  Then you write that AA isn't more consistent.  How many games are you watching?  Good teams at AA don't have serious weaknesses and are consistent. 
A piece of advice, get informed before you have little Johnny Hockey skate up.  More than one team has struggled skating up this season and sometimes clubs push kids to skate up to meet tier requirements.  The Kings team you reference has one win in CAHA. 
The only division you haven't mentioned is, AAA.  If you are looking for that, I'm sure you can find it.  Somebody will tell you whatever you want and cash the check.

Informed how? I said that the Ducks will have an 07 PWAA team next year, which they will. And the next year they will be AAA Minor.  And the following they will be AAA Major. Am I missing something?   
   
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 05, 2016, 12:13:16 PM
Just Saying, you think the coaches will be able to co-exist. More importantly which one will be HC? Just asking
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on December 05, 2016, 12:19:13 PM
A realist would know that PW is watered down. B is basically in-house. BB/A is a hodgepodge of kids that belong there and kids that don't. AA isn't much more consistent.  There will likely be a Ducks PWAA team next year with 07s on it, but the question is if it'll be all 07s or have some 06s like the Kings PWAA 06/05 team this year.  If the Ducks ever want to seriously contend with the 07 Kings, who will get better and better as the years go by, they'll need to make some tough decisions this Spring.


No bone to pick in this thread, but Peewee B is peewee B.  If you want to play hockey, you have to start somewhere. 
You mention BB/A is a hodge podge of kids that don't belong there.  Where do they belong then?  Then you write that AA isn't more consistent.  How many games are you watching?  Good teams at AA don't have serious weaknesses and are consistent. 
A piece of advice, get informed before you have little Johnny Hockey skate up.  More than one team has struggled skating up this season and sometimes clubs push kids to skate up to meet tier requirements.  The Kings team you reference has one win in CAHA. 
The only division you haven't mentioned is, AAA.  If you are looking for that, I'm sure you can find it.  Somebody will tell you whatever you want and cash the check.

Informed how? I said that the Ducks will have an 07 PWAA team next year, which they will. And the next year they will be AAA Minor.  And the following they will be AAA Major. Am I missing something?   
 


I'm confused and just don't understand how that 07 team can be AA next year. Especially if they will not even be the strongest team of of the 3?? Do we all think they will be better than Khon and Runtso?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 05, 2016, 12:38:59 PM
A realist would know that PW is watered down. B is basically in-house. BB/A is a hodgepodge of kids that belong there and kids that don't. AA isn't much more consistent.  There will likely be a Ducks PWAA team next year with 07s on it, but the question is if it'll be all 07s or have some 06s like the Kings PWAA 06/05 team this year.  If the Ducks ever want to seriously contend with the 07 Kings, who will get better and better as the years go by, they'll need to make some tough decisions this Spring.


No bone to pick in this thread, but Peewee B is peewee B.  If you want to play hockey, you have to start somewhere. 
You mention BB/A is a hodge podge of kids that don't belong there.  Where do they belong then?  Then you write that AA isn't more consistent.  How many games are you watching?  Good teams at AA don't have serious weaknesses and are consistent. 
A piece of advice, get informed before you have little Johnny Hockey skate up.  More than one team has struggled skating up this season and sometimes clubs push kids to skate up to meet tier requirements.  The Kings team you reference has one win in CAHA. 
The only division you haven't mentioned is, AAA.  If you are looking for that, I'm sure you can find it.  Somebody will tell you whatever you want and cash the check.

Informed how? I said that the Ducks will have an 07 PWAA team next year, which they will. And the next year they will be AAA Minor.  And the following they will be AAA Major. Am I missing something?   
 


I'm confused and just don't understand how that 07 team can be AA next year. Especially if they will not even be the strongest team of of the 3?? Do we all think they will be better than Khon and Runtso?

Really we're just theorizing... but to eventually have PW AAA Minor/Major, the 07s will play up next year. PW A would be smart, but they're often pushed to AA. Should they? Probably not. Who will coach? Just as hazy.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Richard Cranium on December 05, 2016, 02:02:13 PM
Who knows if they will keep they're talent next season... I heard some could be going to the Kings program next season
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 05, 2016, 02:41:34 PM
Who knows if they will keep they're talent next season... I heard some could be going to the Kings program next season

You think they'll make the team?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 05, 2016, 03:21:52 PM
I think there are several players that have a shot at making the team as long as they leave their parents at home. Let the kids play and the coaches coach and enjoy the game.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 06, 2016, 07:50:03 AM
I think there are several players that have a shot at making the team as long as they leave their parents at home. Let the kids play and the coaches coach and enjoy the game.

Well... when a season doesn't cost $4000 and there isn't constant pressure to get better and attend $50 an hour clinics (don't forget the rink charge!) three times a week then that might happen. In the meantime, those glum faces along the boards watching every move will continue to loom. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 06, 2016, 10:13:43 AM
I don't know how much it cost, everyone should want their child to.get better. I'm not sure about the clinics either, but practice isnt enough to get better. That will just maintain you on the team. I have my son practice outside while i take shots at him. Also i have found that coaches usually let the goalie attend their staking clinics for free.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 06, 2016, 10:25:53 AM
This weeks rankings and lines.  Ducks (EK) v. Wave (Art) is the game of the week.  Looking forward to the big clash next week between #2 Jr Kings and #1 Wave (Art).   

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)


Wave-Ont (2)    vs.    Bears                 Bears by 3
Jr Gulls             vs.    Jr Ducks (1)        Jr Gulls by 2
Ice Dogs (1)      vs.    Jr. Kings             Jr Kings by 2
Wave-Art (1)     vs.    Jr Ducks (2)        Wave (Art) by 1
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 06, 2016, 10:35:20 AM
Goalie_dad, I feel the Ducks are going to beat the Waves this weekend.
Will the Kings beat the Waves the following weekend. I know thats looking ahead but just curious
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 06, 2016, 11:29:35 AM
This weeks rankings and lines.  Ducks (EK) v. Wave (Art) is the game of the week.  Looking forward to the big clash next week between #2 Jr Kings and #1 Wave (Art).   

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)


Wave-Ont (2)    vs.    Bears                 Bears by 3
Jr Gulls             vs.    Jr Ducks (1)        Jr Gulls by 2
Ice Dogs (1)      vs.    Jr. Kings             Jr Kings by 2
Wave-Art (1)     vs.    Jr Ducks (2)        Wave (Art) by 1


I'll give the goals in all 4 games.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 06, 2016, 12:52:59 PM
Bear71, are you drinking this early?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 06, 2016, 02:02:54 PM
TTB, you assume that I stopped at some point.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 06, 2016, 06:22:41 PM
TTB, you assume that I stopped at some point.


That's funny. Funnier is the Bears being favorites?! Unchartered territory!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 07, 2016, 10:44:53 AM
I can hear ants fart it's so damn quiet!!!! I think this site offended to many people. The 06 Ducks are back, the 07 Ducks are mute.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 07, 2016, 11:01:20 AM
TTB, you assume that I stopped at some point.


That's funny. Funnier is the Bears being favorites?! Unchartered territory!

The Wave (Ont) are the only team Bears will be favored against in SQA unless something significant changes for them.  They seem to be improving but so do the rest of the teams.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 07, 2016, 11:03:44 AM
Damn Goalie_dad, you make it sound like their going to go 3-12. Lol
Bear71, what's your thought on that.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on December 07, 2016, 01:23:58 PM
Bears have been pretty close to winning several games, just seem to break down in the third.  They almost eliminated EK Ducks in the Thanksgiving tourney.....I wouldn't be surprised to see them closer to the top by the end of the season. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 07, 2016, 02:00:42 PM
Go Kings 26, I think thats pushing it, unless you consider 6th place the top. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 07, 2016, 04:03:53 PM
Damn Goalie_dad, you make it sound like their going to go 3-12. Lol
Bear71, what's your thought on that.
If the chalk won every game, gambling would be easy and Vegas would be ashes (I know, I'm taking all 4 favorites this week, but laying the points).  I wouldn't be surprised if the Bears pulled off an upset or three along the way. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 07, 2016, 05:50:02 PM
Damn Goalie_dad, you make it sound like their going to go 3-12. Lol
Bear71, what's your thought on that.
If the chalk won every game, gambling would be easy and Vegas would be ashes (I know, I'm taking all 4 favorites this week, but laying the points).  I wouldn't be surprised if the Bears pulled off an upset or three along the way.

Nor would I, hence upsets.  They will win some games they are not favored in I would expect.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 07, 2016, 09:20:32 PM
I agree with you, i just hope they dont win against us.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 09, 2016, 06:05:59 PM
Why is everyone so damn quiet this week
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on December 09, 2016, 08:46:10 PM
what is there left to say?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 09, 2016, 09:06:36 PM
The Ducks will beat the Waves this week.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 09, 2016, 09:34:31 PM
The Ducks will beat the Waves this week.

I wouldn't bet on that.  What Ducks team will show up TTB,  they are so inconsistent.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 09, 2016, 10:08:53 PM
Goalie_dad, hopefully the consistent one. We've been resting the last three weeks.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 10, 2016, 03:03:13 PM
Goalie_dad, hopefully the consistent one. We've been resting the last three weeks.


Resting?! Sounds like rust... not to mention half your team played in the Youth Cup. I'm laying the favorite!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 10, 2016, 03:13:57 PM
At least half of us will be fresh. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 10, 2016, 03:59:50 PM
At least half of us will be fresh. Lol

Unfortunately the kids that score aren't the fresh ones  :-\

Best to give the points and take the favorite.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 10, 2016, 04:12:06 PM
Lol, that was good. Can I buy some points.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 10, 2016, 04:23:19 PM
Lol, that was good. Can I buy some points.

I figured you would be taking the points and picking underdog.  Aren't JDs winning so no need for points, right TTB?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 10, 2016, 04:27:53 PM
Yes they are, I'm optimistic. Can't bet against them.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 10, 2016, 05:02:16 PM
Yes they are, I'm optimistic. Can't bet against them.
You should.  Betting with the head typically is favored over betting with the heart (except for romance).
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 10, 2016, 05:09:03 PM
Yes they are, I'm optimistic. Can't bet against them.
You should.  Betting with the head typically is favored over betting with the heart (except for romance).

Even in romance, bet with your head ;D.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 10, 2016, 05:10:32 PM
Yes they are, I'm optimistic. Can't bet against them.
You should.  Betting with the head typically is favored over betting with the heart (except for romance).

Even in romance, bet with your head ;D .


Let's keep this clean, let's keep this clean!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 11, 2016, 10:28:25 AM
Bears beat Wave Ontario 7-2.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on December 11, 2016, 11:05:19 AM
Dogs 6 kings 2 worst ref job I have ever seen Dogs were the better team today, but not 4 goals better.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 11, 2016, 11:58:25 AM
Dogs 6 kings 2 worst ref job I have ever seen Dogs were the better team today, but not 4 goals better.


Ours was tighter than score. 3-2 going into 3rd. Ontario definitely playing better. Harder. Refs were inconsistent. But they generally let them play. I wish more crews would just swallow their whistles and let them play. That's why parents get pissed off; the inconsistent, ticky-tack penalties. If it's blatant, call it, otherwise get out of the way and keep the game moving.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 11, 2016, 01:53:39 PM
Any other scores? SoCal's Game of the Week is coming up soon. TTB must be giddy with anticipation.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 11, 2016, 02:07:53 PM
Just Saying, I am excited. Hopefully the outcome will be what i want. Gulls beat the Ducks 1 5-0.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 11, 2016, 02:59:02 PM
Just Saying, I am excited. Hopefully the outcome will be what i want. Gulls beat the Ducks 1 5-0.


Waiting for your Periscope of the game with running commentary...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 11, 2016, 06:48:53 PM
TTB must be mourning...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 11, 2016, 06:55:09 PM
I'm Sitting Shiva until next Sunday at 10:20.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 11, 2016, 07:33:49 PM
Might be a looooong "holiday" break...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 11, 2016, 07:44:01 PM
It won't be that long, we will be have Cub meat for breakfast next Sunday morning. You guys can join me we will have leftover. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 11, 2016, 07:48:37 PM
You'd be surprised how many people have Duck for Christmas these days... more and more common.  ;)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 11, 2016, 07:51:00 PM
Dogs 6 kings 2 worst ref job I have ever seen Dogs were the better team today, but not 4 goals better.


All kidding aside... there were 19 penalties in your game?? That's just stupid.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 11, 2016, 07:54:16 PM
Lol, I can't believe there were that many, unless there was a bench clearing brawl among some 9 & 10 year olds.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on December 11, 2016, 08:17:21 PM
Dogs 6 kings 2 worst ref job I have ever seen Dogs were the better team today, but not 4 goals better.


All kidding aside... there were 19 penalties in your game?? That's just stupid.

The Ref started calling ticky-tack fouls twenty-two seconds in and just kept going.  It was very one-sided until the Ref decided to give some make-up calls in the third.  Now, believe me, the Kings were awful today  and this certainly played a big role.  Unfortunately the Ref inserted himself early and impacted the flow of the game.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: sjtender31 on December 11, 2016, 08:59:16 PM
Dogs 6 kings 2 worst ref job I have ever seen Dogs were the better team today, but not 4 goals better.


Well.....the Dogs were actually every bit of those 4 goals better and actually 5 if were being honest. The kings definitely got themselves into penalty trouble as did the dogs at times. The Dogs were relentless in 5 on 5 action and had at least (2) short handed goals. The Dogs scored another goal that was disallowed because the net came off; however if the zebra would have actually been in position he would have seen that the net came off after the puck had long been in the net. Credit to the Kings for the valiant effort in the the 3rd period. They had numerous PP opportunities including a 5 on 3 for almost a full 2 min and the Dogs tender came up big every time he needed to, including multiple 1 on 1 opportunities. Top to bottom, the Dogs outplayed the Kings on this Sunday and they were indeed 4 goals better. That's not a knock on the Kings by any means, if anyone has truly followed the division the top teams are all pretty capable of competing with each other on "any given Sunday"





Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on December 11, 2016, 11:27:14 PM
Dogs 6 kings 2 worst ref job I have ever seen Dogs were the better team today, but not 4 goals better.


Well.....the Dogs were actually every bit of those 4 goals better and actually 5 if were being honest. The kings definitely got themselves into penalty trouble as did the dogs at times. The Dogs were relentless in 5 on 5 action and had at least (2) short handed goals. The Dogs scored another goal that was disallowed because the net came off; however if the zebra would have actually been in position he would have seen that the net came off after the puck had long been in the net. Credit to the Kings for the valiant effort in the the 3rd period. They had numerous PP opportunities including a 5 on 3 for almost a full 2 min and the Dogs tender came up big every time he needed to, including multiple 1 on 1 opportunities. Top to bottom, the Dogs outplayed the Kings on this Sunday and they were indeed 4 goals better. That's not a knock on the Kings by any means, if anyone has truly followed the division the top teams are all pretty capable of competing with each other on "any given Sunday"







That's a load the refs spotted you two goals and you scored an empty netter. Of it was such a dominant performance then how was the game tied 2-2 until late in the 2nd pd?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: sjtender31 on December 12, 2016, 07:22:59 AM
 The refs spotted us two goals???  Yes we were up 2–0;  however one of them came on the power play and one of them was SHORTHANDED!!!  The reason the game was tied at one point in the 2nd was because of those exact ticky-tack calls you referred to.  And if you were going to paint the picture about the empty net goal, tell it like it is..... you guys had a full two-man advantage and your coaches with five minutes left in the game & chose to pull the goalie.  So that gave you a three-man advantage and you got scored on again  SHORTHANDED!!!  When you're team had plenty of opportunities in the third period, they were stopped.  In fact, late in the 2nd With a 2 on 0 situation our goalie robbed your player which shifted momentum because we turned around and scored a goal (equal strength) right after.  After we scored to go ahead, your team was given numerous power-play opportunities and had no answer;  it happens, they are all young players and some days just go this way.  You have a very good little group over there,  and yesterday just wasn't their day.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 12, 2016, 07:46:42 AM
Sounds like there is a rivalry brewing. Don't worry we won't mention the San Jose Goalie that comes down to play with you guys. Different Day, Different Battle. Lol way to recruit within
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 12, 2016, 08:02:57 AM
UH OH... circle that next Jr. Kings/Ice Dogs matchup on the calendar... a blood feud has begun!


Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: sjtender31 on December 12, 2016, 08:09:05 AM
No "rivalry" on this side, the Dogs are coached to understand that every game is a new game and that on any day, anyone can be beat.


The San Jose goalie definitely loves playing with his Dogs teammates!! This  doesn't have anything to do with "recruiting",  it has everything to do with a long standing friendship between the dads, that has  been passed on to the boys/families. Not sure why this is such a big deal to some, the tender is a great kid and does a good job between the pipes.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 12, 2016, 08:41:00 AM
Just Saying, January 22nd, 2017 is the rematch.
Sjtender31, are you implying that no other coach prepares their kids like it's a new game. Also I wasn't referring to the tender not being a good kid or anything.
Goalie_dad, i know it's early but what's the lines and ranking for next week. It looks like the Dogs are in the top 4 finally. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on December 12, 2016, 08:48:45 AM
The refs spotted us two goals???  Yes we were up 2–0;  however one of them came on the power play and one of them was SHORTHANDED!!!  The reason the game was tied at one point in the 2nd was because of those exact ticky-tack calls you referred to.  And if you were going to paint the picture about the empty net goal, tell it like it is..... you guys had a full two-man advantage and your coaches with five minutes left in the game & chose to pull the goalie.  So that gave you a three-man advantage and you got scored on again  SHORTHANDED!!!  When you're team had plenty of opportunities in the third period, they were stopped.  In fact, late in the 2nd With a 2 on 0 situation our goalie robbed your player which shifted momentum because we turned around and scored a goal (equal strength) right after.  After we scored to go ahead, your team was given numerous power-play opportunities and had no answer;  it happens, they are all young players and some days just go this way.  You have a very good little group over there,  and yesterday just wasn't their day.
Not sure what game you were watching....at no point were the ice dogs dominating; however, in several instances the kings were asleep. How does a dominating team not score more goals with multiple 5 on 3s?  I had expected a tougher team, and surely had not expected a Kings hangover.  I think I saw one play where the ice dogs actually had to work for a goal.  Reminded me a lot of the Gulls 5 to 1 defeat of the kings a few months back.  The Gulls have since lost twice to the Kings.  With respect to the goal being off, you were obviously not near the net because you could hear a dad yelling the net was off and see the goalie talking to the ref prior to the goal. Were you on rink B for this one?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on December 12, 2016, 08:49:58 AM
The best part of the entire game were the ice dogs parents yelling that the Kings were coached to fall!  That was hilarious.....I think they have figured out the secret sauce.....Kings do superman all practice long.  Classy Ice Dogs, Classy.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 12, 2016, 09:05:26 AM
I look forward to trying to beat the Kings, but try not to brag if we do. They are an all 07 team and if we were to pump our chest about beating kids younger than ours what would that show. I wish my kid was good enough to play on a birth year team and up at the same time. I give credit to those young kids for playing at this level, but in the same breath hope we beat then in the future. Lol i wasnt there but their coaching staff have a great resume.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on December 12, 2016, 09:28:23 AM
A team with a goalie from San Jose and a poster on calhockey named sjtender31 bragging in every post about how good said goalie is. Gee, I wonder who in the world could that be?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: lcadad on December 12, 2016, 09:48:10 AM
A team with a goalie from San Jose and a poster on calhockey named sjtender31 bragging in every post about how good said goalie is. Gee, I wonder who in the world could that be?


Clearly just a fan of 10 year old goalie prospects!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Handboni on December 12, 2016, 10:07:23 AM
California is known for producing goalies prospects in the last few years.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: sjtender31 on December 12, 2016, 10:10:08 AM
Just Saying, January 22nd, 2017 is the rematch.
Sjtender31, are you implying that no other coach prepares their kids like it's a new game. Also I wasn't referring to the tender not being a good kid or anything.
Goalie_dad, i know it's early but what's the lines and ranking for next week. It looks like the Dogs are in the top 4 finally. Lol


Tommy, not implying anything on any other coach or staff. Just speaking on what i can confirm.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 12, 2016, 10:14:58 AM
4BobbyOrr, well said. That's the Ice Dogs first win against a top team if I'm not mistaken. Let's let them gloat for a bit. We will see if their legit next time they play a top team.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: sjtender31 on December 12, 2016, 10:15:24 AM
The refs spotted us two goals???  Yes we were up 2–0;  however one of them came on the power play and one of them was SHORTHANDED!!!  The reason the game was tied at one point in the 2nd was because of those exact ticky-tack calls you referred to.  And if you were going to paint the picture about the empty net goal, tell it like it is..... you guys had a full two-man advantage and your coaches with five minutes left in the game & chose to pull the goalie.  So that gave you a three-man advantage and you got scored on again  SHORTHANDED!!!  When you're team had plenty of opportunities in the third period, they were stopped.  In fact, late in the 2nd With a 2 on 0 situation our goalie robbed your player which shifted momentum because we turned around and scored a goal (equal strength) right after.  After we scored to go ahead, your team was given numerous power-play opportunities and had no answer;  it happens, they are all young players and some days just go this way.  You have a very good little group over there,  and yesterday just wasn't their day.
Not sure what game you were watching....at no point were the ice dogs dominating; however, in several instances the kings were asleep. How does a dominating team not score more goals with multiple 5 on 3s?  I had expected a tougher team, and surely had not expected a Kings hangover.  I think I saw one play where the ice dogs actually had to work for a goal.  Reminded me a lot of the Gulls 5 to 1 defeat of the kings a few months back.  The Gulls have since lost twice to the Kings.  With respect to the goal being off, you were obviously not near the net because you could hear a dad yelling the net was off and see the goalie talking to the ref prior to the goal. Were you on rink B for this one?




To be fair, I dont recall using the word dominating and never have I insinuated that the Kings are a bad team. I do agree that the Kings may have been asleep in certain situations; it happens. I was surprised by both teams really at the failure to score on the 5 on 3 chances; however there were a few goals scored on hard work for sure. On this particular sunday the Dogs were a better team. The Dogs went through something similar with the Gulls last month as well; Dogs were god awful and the Gulls were ready to play.....again, it happens.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 12, 2016, 10:15:44 AM
Fair enough.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: sjtender31 on December 12, 2016, 10:21:59 AM
A team with a goalie from San Jose and a poster on calhockey named sjtender31 bragging in every post about how good said goalie is. Gee, I wonder who in the world could that be?




Bobby.....im definitely the goalie dad, I don't hide and made damn sure the screen name was obvious. I don't see anywhere that I am "bragging" about anything. Our tender was good when he needed to be, made some timely saves and ultimately did his job. If you know me at all, I'm the first one to tell you if our tender isn't up to par and he's my son. If I were "bragging" on anything, it would be (ironically) the fact that we scored more short handed goals than PP goals. Unless your referring to bragging where I said he was a good kid that does a good job between the pipes.....if thats the case, i'll take it.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockeyking on December 12, 2016, 10:23:43 AM
Does anyone have any info on the Duck (EK)/Wave game?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 12, 2016, 10:26:44 AM
Sjtender31, I can appreciate that you aren't hiding who you are. It will be a fun season and really competitive at the top.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: sjtender31 on December 12, 2016, 10:32:35 AM
Tommy, I completely agree! It is always a ton of fun seeing the progression and I really enjoy that the teams in this division have some great games. It makes for a fun season in lieu of blowout, boring games. Best of luck the rest of the way
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 12, 2016, 11:33:56 AM
Sjtender31, I can appreciate that you aren't hiding who you are. It will be a fun season and really competitive at the top.
TTB, your first sentence is hilarious, given some of your past posts.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 12, 2016, 12:32:15 PM
Bear71, you guys didn't look hard enough for me at the Semi-Finals game. I was there, I just had to move cause my legs were cramping. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 12, 2016, 02:41:10 PM
Bear71, you guys didn't look hard enough for me at the Semi-Finals game. I was there, I just had to move cause my legs were cramping. Lol


Nowhere to hide at pickwick... 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 12, 2016, 02:47:16 PM
We played them at Westminster.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 12, 2016, 03:07:34 PM
Next week. Burbank. Where the staph infections come complementary.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 12, 2016, 03:09:54 PM
Correct but I was referring to when we played them during the Thanksgiving Tournament. Bear71 was looking for me
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 13, 2016, 01:14:58 PM
When's that line coming out?  And the new power ranking? You know, the one that still has the IDs 4th and the Bears 7th... despite the Bears having a better record and head-to-head win over the 6th ranked team.  ;)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 13, 2016, 01:26:43 PM
Will the Dogs be ranked before the Kings or was that win an anomaly?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 13, 2016, 03:12:25 PM
And perhaps, in the spirit of competition... we add an "upset of the week" feature???
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 13, 2016, 05:12:50 PM
Yup I'm curios who it's going to be this week. Last week was the Kings
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 13, 2016, 05:53:05 PM
Yup I'm curios who it's going to be this week. Last week was the Kings


Feel free to not look to far from home for that upset of the week, TTB. ;)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 13, 2016, 07:09:50 PM
Yup I'm curios who it's going to be this week. Last week was the Kings


Feel free to not look to far from home for that upset of the week, TTB. ;)


Torpedo in the water!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 13, 2016, 07:38:18 PM
Bears71, I see the Bears are on a hell of a winning streak. 1 game constitutes a streak for them. Congrats and enjoy it cause we will break it this Sunday.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 13, 2016, 08:41:17 PM
Bears71, I see the Bears are on a hell of a winning streak. 1 game constitutes a streak for them. Congrats and enjoy it cause we will break it this Sunday.


Look at Joe Namath here! Haven't heard such a bold prediction since the Youth Cup!  :o
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 13, 2016, 08:44:54 PM
Just Saying, make sure to.address me by Broadway Joe please!!!! Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on December 13, 2016, 09:05:16 PM
Definitely no Messier
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 14, 2016, 09:48:21 AM
This weeks rankings and lines.  Predicting an upset TTB, sorry. 

Kings are still stronger than IDs but its really close, Kings have a poor showing against Wave and things will change (unless IDs have poor showing too).
Bears didn't impress in the win against Wave (Ont), they need to beat a top team.  This week is their chance and its against the hated EK Ducks!!!

Game of the week is Jr. Kings vs. Wave (Art).

Rank   Team
1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Jr Gulls vs. Wave-Ont (2)                  Jr Gulls by 7
Jr Ducks (1) vs. Ice Dogs (1)             Ice Dogs by 4
Bears vs. Jr Ducks (2)                       Bears by 1
Jr. Kings vs. Wave-Art (1)                 Wave(Art) by 2
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 14, 2016, 09:59:33 AM
Goalie_dad, if the Ducks 1 beat the Ice Dogs will that drop the Dogs and move up the Ducks 2 if they also win.
If the Kings beat the Waves will that also swap them since they also beat the Gulls?
When will you be opening the beating website so we can start wagering. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 14, 2016, 11:33:56 AM
This weeks rankings and lines.  Predicting an upset TTB, sorry. 

Kings are still stronger than IDs but its really close, Kings have a poor showing against Wave and things will change (unless IDs have poor showing too).
Bears didn't impress in the win against Wave (Ont), they need to beat a top team.  This week is their chance and its against the hated EK Ducks!!!

Game of the week is Jr. Kings vs. Wave (Art).

Rank   Team
1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Jr Gulls vs. Wave-Ont (2)                  Jr Gulls by 7
Jr Ducks (1) vs. Ice Dogs (1)             Ice Dogs by 4
Bears vs. Jr Ducks (2)                       Bears by 1
Jr. Kings vs. Wave-Art (1)                 Wave(Art) by 2


Bears the favorites two weeks in a row?! This certainly is unchartered territory. Not sure I'd favor them, but certainly in the discussion for an "upset special." Since the Wave (Art) are favorites, I like the Jr. Kings in the upset as well. IDs might be hitting their stride... so the 4 looks about right, if not a bit high. Wave (Ont) will surprise someone one of these weeks, but might not be this week, Gulls are rough. 



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 14, 2016, 11:54:26 AM
Goalie_dad, if the Ducks 1 beat the Ice Dogs will that drop the Dogs and move up the Ducks 2 if they also win.
If the Kings beat the Waves will that also swap them since they also beat the Gulls?
When will you be opening the beating website so we can start wagering. Lol
Tommy's showing that his confidence is waning, as he never before would use the phrase "if they also win" in referencing his beloved Ducks 2, especially against the Bears.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 14, 2016, 06:03:31 PM
TeddyBear71, my confidence will never wane. Get ready to be 2-6, the good part is at least you guys will be able to sniff the Playoffs.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 14, 2016, 07:35:39 PM
Alan Thicke will have had a better day at Pickwick than you will on Sunday, TTB.  What...too soon?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 14, 2016, 08:33:21 PM
TeddyBear71, it is to early, but since you went there. Rumor has it that he was watching you guys practice and couldn't take it anymore. As they were rushing him out he can be heard yelling "That's Not Hockey"
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 15, 2016, 09:12:00 AM
TeddyBear71, it is to early, but since you went there. Rumor has it that he was watching you guys practice and couldn't take it anymore. As they were rushing him out he can be heard yelling "That's Not Hockey"
That's funny, TTB.  Let's see how much you're laughing when you go 0 for December. ;)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 15, 2016, 09:57:33 AM
Bear71, dont worry you guys will be 1-1 this month. But enjoy your hot streak of one game.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on December 15, 2016, 08:05:39 PM
This weeks rankings and lines.  Predicting an upset TTB, sorry. 

Kings are still stronger than IDs but its really close, Kings have a poor showing against Wave and things will change (unless IDs have poor showing too).
Bears didn't impress in the win against Wave (Ont), they need to beat a top team.  This week is their chance and its against the hated EK Ducks!!!

Game of the week is Jr. Kings vs. Wave (Art).

Rank   Team
1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Jr Gulls vs. Wave-Ont (2)                  Jr Gulls by 7
Jr Ducks (1) vs. Ice Dogs (1)             Ice Dogs by 4
Bears vs. Jr Ducks (2)                       Bears by 1
Jr. Kings vs. Wave-Art (1)                 Wave(Art) by 2


Can someone do the math for me on these rankings?  Kings 2 wins/1loss against the Jr. Gulls; Kings 2 wins/1 loss against wave.....Kings ranked lower than both.....huh?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 15, 2016, 08:10:24 PM
Go_Kings 26 and Goalie_dad, I'm interested to see if the ranking changes if the Kings beat the Wave. Also I was curious why the Ice Dogs weren't ahead of the Kings since they beat them last week. It's an interesting ranking.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 15, 2016, 08:49:16 PM
This weeks rankings and lines.  Predicting an upset TTB, sorry. 

Kings are still stronger than IDs but its really close, Kings have a poor showing against Wave and things will change (unless IDs have poor showing too).
Bears didn't impress in the win against Wave (Ont), they need to beat a top team.  This week is their chance and its against the hated EK Ducks!!!

Game of the week is Jr. Kings vs. Wave (Art).

Rank   Team
1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Jr Gulls vs. Wave-Ont (2)                  Jr Gulls by 7
Jr Ducks (1) vs. Ice Dogs (1)             Ice Dogs by 4
Bears vs. Jr Ducks (2)                       Bears by 1
Jr. Kings vs. Wave-Art (1)                 Wave(Art) by 2


Can someone do the math for me on these rankings?  Kings 2 wins/1loss against the Jr. Gulls; Kings 2 wins/1 loss against wave.....Kings ranked lower than both.....huh?


I believe goalie dad also has a hand in the BCS rankings... as most are due to the eye test. Example: Ducks (1) are 1-6. They beat Wave (Ont) by 3. Bears are 2-5. They beat Ducks (1) and they beat Wave (Ont) by 5. So of course Ducks (1) are ranked higher than Bears. Because, you know, the eye test.  ::)

All will be moot, though, when the Bears knock off the Lil' Tommy Bumblers and claim that 5th spot!!!  WHAT?!?!?!  Uh oh, here comes a TTB hot take!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 15, 2016, 10:21:50 PM
Just Saying, you don't need to worry about us. We will beat the Teddy Bears on Sunday morning. You can take that to the bank.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 15, 2016, 10:35:42 PM
Just Saying, you don't need to worry about us. We will beat the Teddy Bears on Sunday morning. You can take that to the bank.


I will try... but I'm pretty sure the bank is closed on Sunday. Oh, sad face...  :(



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 15, 2016, 10:40:39 PM
This weeks rankings and lines.  Predicting an upset TTB, sorry. 

Kings are still stronger than IDs but its really close, Kings have a poor showing against Wave and things will change (unless IDs have poor showing too).
Bears didn't impress in the win against Wave (Ont), they need to beat a top team.  This week is their chance and its against the hated EK Ducks!!!

Game of the week is Jr. Kings vs. Wave (Art).

Rank   Team
1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Jr Gulls vs. Wave-Ont (2)                  Jr Gulls by 7
Jr Ducks (1) vs. Ice Dogs (1)             Ice Dogs by 4
Bears vs. Jr Ducks (2)                       Bears by 1
Jr. Kings vs. Wave-Art (1)                 Wave(Art) by 2


Can someone do the math for me on these rankings?  Kings 2 wins/1loss against the Jr. Gulls; Kings 2 wins/1 loss against wave.....Kings ranked lower than both.....huh?


I believe goalie dad also has a hand in the BCS rankings... as most are due to the eye test. Example: Ducks (1) are 1-6. They beat Wave (Ont) by 3. Bears are 2-5. They beat Ducks (1) and they beat Wave (Ont) by 5. So of course Ducks (1) are ranked higher than Bears. Because, you know, the eye test.  ::)

All will be moot, though, when the Bears knock off the Lil' Tommy Bumblers and claim that 5th spot!!!  WHAT?!?!?!  Uh oh, here comes a TTB hot take!!!

What quality wins do the Bears have?  Ducks (1) beat Kings in Thanksgiving tournament (and beat Ducks (2) in pre-season).  Comparing how many goals the Bears beat Wave (Ont) is not a good indication.  When Bears played Ducks (1) it was a one goal game that could have gone either way.

Like I said, Bears need a quality win, they beat Ducks (2) they will claim the 6th spot.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 15, 2016, 10:46:24 PM
This weeks rankings and lines.  Predicting an upset TTB, sorry. 

Kings are still stronger than IDs but its really close, Kings have a poor showing against Wave and things will change (unless IDs have poor showing too).
Bears didn't impress in the win against Wave (Ont), they need to beat a top team.  This week is their chance and its against the hated EK Ducks!!!

Game of the week is Jr. Kings vs. Wave (Art).

Rank   Team
1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Jr Gulls vs. Wave-Ont (2)                  Jr Gulls by 7
Jr Ducks (1) vs. Ice Dogs (1)             Ice Dogs by 4
Bears vs. Jr Ducks (2)                       Bears by 1
Jr. Kings vs. Wave-Art (1)                 Wave(Art) by 2


Can someone do the math for me on these rankings?  Kings 2 wins/1loss against the Jr. Gulls; Kings 2 wins/1 loss against wave.....Kings ranked lower than both.....huh?

It is their body of work.  Kings lost to Ducks (2) and Ice Dogs in season, also lost to Ducks (1) in Thanksgiving tournament.  According to my records, the Kings lost to Wave (Art) in regular season and beat Wave (Art) in preseason.  I give more credibility to a regular season win.  Also, while it is true they beat Gulls in regular season and NHL Cup its those loses to teams ranked below them that is keeping them in 3rd.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 15, 2016, 10:47:55 PM
This weeks rankings and lines.  Predicting an upset TTB, sorry. 

Kings are still stronger than IDs but its really close, Kings have a poor showing against Wave and things will change (unless IDs have poor showing too).
Bears didn't impress in the win against Wave (Ont), they need to beat a top team.  This week is their chance and its against the hated EK Ducks!!!

Game of the week is Jr. Kings vs. Wave (Art).

Rank   Team
1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Jr Gulls vs. Wave-Ont (2)                  Jr Gulls by 7
Jr Ducks (1) vs. Ice Dogs (1)             Ice Dogs by 4
Bears vs. Jr Ducks (2)                       Bears by 1
Jr. Kings vs. Wave-Art (1)                 Wave(Art) by 2


Can someone do the math for me on these rankings?  Kings 2 wins/1loss against the Jr. Gulls; Kings 2 wins/1 loss against wave.....Kings ranked lower than both.....huh?


I believe goalie dad also has a hand in the BCS rankings... as most are due to the eye test. Example: Ducks (1) are 1-6. They beat Wave (Ont) by 3. Bears are 2-5. They beat Ducks (1) and they beat Wave (Ont) by 5. So of course Ducks (1) are ranked higher than Bears. Because, you know, the eye test.  ::)

All will be moot, though, when the Bears knock off the Lil' Tommy Bumblers and claim that 5th spot!!!  WHAT?!?!?!  Uh oh, here comes a TTB hot take!!!

If I had a hand in BCS rankings, USC would be in the college football playoffs, not that joke of a team Washington.   >:(
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 15, 2016, 10:56:14 PM
This weeks rankings and lines.  Predicting an upset TTB, sorry. 

Kings are still stronger than IDs but its really close, Kings have a poor showing against Wave and things will change (unless IDs have poor showing too).
Bears didn't impress in the win against Wave (Ont), they need to beat a top team.  This week is their chance and its against the hated EK Ducks!!!

Game of the week is Jr. Kings vs. Wave (Art).

Rank   Team
1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

Jr Gulls vs. Wave-Ont (2)                  Jr Gulls by 7
Jr Ducks (1) vs. Ice Dogs (1)             Ice Dogs by 4
Bears vs. Jr Ducks (2)                       Bears by 1
Jr. Kings vs. Wave-Art (1)                 Wave(Art) by 2


Can someone do the math for me on these rankings?  Kings 2 wins/1loss against the Jr. Gulls; Kings 2 wins/1 loss against wave.....Kings ranked lower than both.....huh?


I believe goalie dad also has a hand in the BCS rankings... as most are due to the eye test. Example: Ducks (1) are 1-6. They beat Wave (Ont) by 3. Bears are 2-5. They beat Ducks (1) and they beat Wave (Ont) by 5. So of course Ducks (1) are ranked higher than Bears. Because, you know, the eye test.  ::)

All will be moot, though, when the Bears knock off the Lil' Tommy Bumblers and claim that 5th spot!!!  WHAT?!?!?!  Uh oh, here comes a TTB hot take!!!

What quality wins do the Bears have?  Ducks (1) beat Kings in Thanksgiving tournament (and beat Ducks (2) in pre-season).  Comparing how many goals the Bears beat Wave (Ont) is not a good indication.  When Bears played Ducks (1) it was a one goal game that could have gone either way.

Like I said, Bears need a quality win, they beat Ducks (2) they will claim the 6th spot.


Oh, I know, I know... we're all praying to our pagan gods for a Sunday miracle to ruin TTB's day. And 'tis the season of miracles...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 15, 2016, 11:28:32 PM
Just Saying, I see a lot of you knuckleheads want to see us lose on Sunday but I look forward to disappointing you guys this weekend. No miracle this Sunday. And Bear71 for Christmas I'm going to be giving you a lose.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 16, 2016, 07:23:33 AM
TTB, no need to wrap it or send it through Santa.  Hand delivery is fine (I'm sure you are familiar with that concept).  I'll be the good looking guy with the shit-eating grin on his face Sunday.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 16, 2016, 07:50:50 AM
Crom,
I have never prayed to you before. I have no tongue for it. No one, not even you, will remember if we were good boys or bad. Why we won, or why we lost. All that matters is that the Bears stood against the Ducks. That's what's important! Valor pleases you, Crom... so grant us one request:
Grant us revenge!
And if you do not listen,
then to HELL with you!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: MO-ICETIME on December 16, 2016, 08:19:20 AM
Crom,
I have never prayed to you before. I have no tongue for it. No one, not even you, will remember if we were good boys or bad. Why we won, or why we lost. All that matters is that the Bears stood against the Ducks. That's what's important! Valor pleases you, Crom... so grant us one request:
Grant us revenge!
And if you do not listen,
then to HELL with you!
HAHA! My favorite movie!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 16, 2016, 08:35:42 AM
Be careful what you pray for. Lol, it will be a long game for some parents on Sunday. I look forward to throwing a victory party. Bears71, wipe the dookie off your face before you congratulate us Sunday afternoon.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 16, 2016, 09:36:02 AM
Bears71, if you recall last time we played each other on Oct. 23rd  @ 7:30 A.M. We beat you like a drum 8-0!!!! Just cause you guys lost by one to us in the Thanksgiving Tourney doesn't mean you guys got that much better. We played bad and you guys got luck.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 16, 2016, 10:59:52 AM
Bears71, if you recall last time we played each other on Oct. 23rd  @ 7:30 A.M. We beat you like a drum 8-0!!!! Just cause you guys lost by one to us in the Thanksgiving Tourney doesn't mean you guys got that much better. We played bad and you guys got luck.


Pride cometh before a fall...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 16, 2016, 11:02:57 AM
Just Saying, have you ever considered being a Pastor or Philosopher. Lol I'm willing to fall if needed.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on December 16, 2016, 11:53:59 AM
Bears71, if you recall last time we played each other on Oct. 23rd  @ 7:30 A.M. We beat you like a drum 8-0!!!! Just cause you guys lost by one to us in the Thanksgiving Tourney doesn't mean you guys got that much better. We played bad and you guys got luck.


Pride cometh before a fall...


TTB it looks like a trend to me.  plus didn't your big stud d-man go to detroit with the 06's?  Those are some big skates to fill, what is the plan for that??




Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 16, 2016, 12:21:00 PM
Bears71, if you recall last time we played each other on Oct. 23rd  @ 7:30 A.M. We beat you like a drum 8-0!!!! Just cause you guys lost by one to us in the Thanksgiving Tourney doesn't mean you guys got that much better. We played bad and you guys got luck.


Pride cometh before a fall...


TTB it looks like a trend to me.  plus didn't your big stud d-man go to detroit with the 06's?  Those are some big skates to fill, what is the plan for that??
I think the plan is TTB will have that excuse all lined up to use.  Ducks 2 might be better off, as their big stud d-man tends to find himself in the box a few times per game.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 16, 2016, 12:39:47 PM
Bears71, I don't need excuses, if I recall correctly you called your team soft and that's to say your son is probably on it. Apples don't fall to far from the tree. No excuses if you beat us you guys beat us. It will be 1 out of 4. But for some that's something to brag about. Either way it will be all settled by this time Sunday.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Puck Yeah on December 16, 2016, 01:08:48 PM
Crom,
I have never prayed to you before. I have no tongue for it. No one, not even you, will remember if we were good boys or bad. Why we won, or why we lost. All that matters is that the Bears stood against the Ducks. That's what's important! Valor pleases you, Crom... so grant us one request:
Grant us revenge!
And if you do not listen,
then to HELL with you!


Krom

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on December 16, 2016, 02:07:54 PM
Bears71, I don't need excuses, if I recall correctly you called your team soft and that's to say your son is probably on it. Apples don't fall to far from the tree. No excuses if you beat us you guys beat us. It will be 1 out of 4. But for some that's something to brag about. Either way it will be all settled by this time Sunday.


TTB, you do not recall correctly.  You were the one who used the word soft; I merely stated that the Bears don't hit skaters, especially defenseless ones.  When we beat you, it will indeed be 1 out of 4, but that 1 will definitely taste sweet, not only for our boys and our parents, but I would assume for many parents of other teams as well.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on December 16, 2016, 02:10:20 PM
Bears71, I don't need excuses, if I recall correctly you called your team soft and that's to say your son is probably on it. Apples don't fall to far from the tree. No excuses if you beat us you guys beat us. It will be 1 out of 4. But for some that's something to brag about. Either way it will be all settled by this time Sunday.

You're only as good as the last game you've played.  That's it. History means next to nothing.  Now it can play a role in the mental aspect, but honestly, this only shows itself at the college level or above. That said, TTB and his mallards have big skates to fill with the Friendly Giant in Detroit.  The Bears showed themselves to have some ability and desire over Thanksgiving.  DK is a good coach so you can expect them to be improved significantly.  I have to go with Da Bears on this one, Crom willing of course.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 16, 2016, 04:54:33 PM
Crom,
I have never prayed to you before. I have no tongue for it. No one, not even you, will remember if we were good boys or bad. Why we won, or why we lost. All that matters is that the Bears stood against the Ducks. That's what's important! Valor pleases you, Crom... so grant us one request:
Grant us revenge!
And if you do not listen,
then to HELL with you!


Krom


No. The phonetic spelling is Krom... but the correct spelling is Crom. Crom gives strength. Crom gives endurance. And Crom has little patience for TTB's insolence.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Puck Yeah on December 17, 2016, 07:11:38 PM
Crom,
I have never prayed to you before. I have no tongue for it. No one, not even you, will remember if we were good boys or bad. Why we won, or why we lost. All that matters is that the Bears stood against the Ducks. That's what's important! Valor pleases you, Crom... so grant us one request:
Grant us revenge!
And if you do not listen,
then to HELL with you!


Krom


No. The phonetic spelling is Krom... but the correct spelling is Crom. Crom gives strength. Crom gives endurance. And Crom has little patience for TTB's insolence.


Americans typically spell it Crom, Norwegians Krom (the right way).  It was just a poke, meant in jest.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 18, 2016, 11:54:21 AM
Ducks (2) beat Bears 6-2. Crom ignores our prayers. Clearly, a sacrifice must be made... we will search the parking lot for TTB.  :P


Other scores???
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 18, 2016, 11:57:23 AM
"Silence is Golden" no need to celebrate have a great day. You guys need to pray to another pagan god. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on December 18, 2016, 12:11:53 PM
Ducks (2) beat Bears 6-2. Crom ignores our prayers. Clearly, a sacrifice must be made... we will search the parking lot for TTB.  :P


Other scores???

Sorry, looks like the Bears will stay in the number 7 spot.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 18, 2016, 12:58:44 PM
Just got to Lakewood, Kings up 1-0 against Waves
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 18, 2016, 01:29:33 PM
Damn, 2-2 tied. If Waves ever play the game correctly and don't cherry pick all the Damn time they might be good. The Waves had a5-3 powerplay for a third of the 3rd period and they couldn't do shit will it. What a waste to see that taught.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 18, 2016, 02:30:45 PM
No updates?



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on December 18, 2016, 03:00:14 PM
Kings 2 Wave 2 final
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 18, 2016, 08:30:21 PM
What happened in other games?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 18, 2016, 09:14:57 PM
I hear that the Gulls thumped the O. Waves 12-2.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Just Saying on December 18, 2016, 09:41:12 PM
Not surprising. How about Ducks (1) v. ID?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 18, 2016, 09:51:31 PM
Infectious Disease also beat the Ducks 1. I don't recall the score
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: BBelieber on December 19, 2016, 08:47:34 AM
Infectious Disease also beat the Ducks 1. I don't recall the score


3-1 Dogs.  Third goal was empty net with one second left.  Was anybody's game; Ducks sure skated well. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on December 23, 2016, 10:10:34 PM
I'd like to Wish Everyone and Safe and Blessed Holiday!!!!! Talk to everyone in two weeks.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 02, 2017, 07:40:22 PM
Happy New Years everyone!!!!!
Goalie_dad,
what's the lines for this weekend? My New Years resolution is to be nicer to Bears71. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on January 03, 2017, 11:47:02 AM
Happy New Years everyone!!!!!
Goalie_dad,
what's the lines for this weekend? My New Years resolution is to be nicer to Bears71. Lol


TTB, my resolution as well is to be nicer.  In past years, I would have called someone out as having poor etiquette who would "LOL" his/her own posts, but 2017 brings about a kinder Bear71.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Handboni on January 03, 2017, 11:59:34 AM
I'm feeling the love!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on January 05, 2017, 09:08:40 AM
No change in rankings.


1. Wave (Art)
2. Gulls
3. Jr Kings
4. Ice Dogs
5. Jr Ducks EK
6. Jr Ducks Runtso
7. Bears
8. Wave (Ont)


This weeks picks:


Jr Kings v. Bears                        Kings by 3
Gulls v. Ice Dogs                        Gulls by 1
Wave (Art) v. Wave (Ont)          Wave (Art) by 8
Ducks EK v. Ducks Runtso        Ducks Runtso by 1



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on January 05, 2017, 03:34:35 PM
Tommy is going to have a heart attack reading that last line.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 05, 2017, 03:45:50 PM
Bears71, not yet. It's to early to have a heart attack. As long as we're ranked before the Bears I'm happy. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 08, 2017, 06:44:54 PM
Bear71, I see the game was closer this time.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on January 09, 2017, 10:29:31 AM
Bear71, I see the game was closer this time.
Perhaps on the scoreboard.  Jr. Kings came out in the first five minutes and punched our team in the mouth.  It was fairly even the next 25 or so minutes, but to their credit the JK's played better throughout and deserved the victory.  It was nice to see a game where the ref didn't have to blow his whistle a ton, let the kids play, and didn't miss many calls (except maybe for a missed roughing/boarding call against one of our boys-our kid went in a bit hard and high on a play).
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on January 09, 2017, 11:09:38 AM
Rankings, again no changes...

1   Wave-Art (1)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Ice Dogs (1)
5   Jr Ducks (2)
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave-Ont (2)

This weeks lines:

Jr Ducks (2)  v. Wave-Art (1)      Wave (Art) by 3
Wave-Ont (2)  v. Jr. Kings          Jr Kings by 5
Bears  v. Jr Gulls                       Gulls by 4
Ice Dogs (1)  v. Jr Ducks (1)       Ice Dogs by 1
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 15, 2017, 09:42:37 PM
It was an interesting day for Hockey today. An upset and I heard the Kings were on the ropes early but woke up in time to beat the O. Waves..... Gulls treated the Bears 71 like a step child.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 15, 2017, 10:05:40 PM
Goalie_dad, can we get a preview on next weeks line. The Ice Dogs/Kings game looks like the game of the week. Maybe our partners can also beat the Waves, and hopefully we pull off the upset of the #1 and go on a two game winning streak
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on January 15, 2017, 11:51:02 PM
Goalie_dad, can we get a preview on next weeks line. The Ice Dogs/Kings game looks like the game of the week. Maybe our partners can also beat the Waves, and hopefully we pull off the upset of the #1 and go on a two game winning streak

Early lines:

Kings over Dogs by 1
Gulls over Ducks EK by 2
Wave Art over Ducks Runtso by 3
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Letsgodux on January 16, 2017, 01:26:10 AM
Jr Ducks (1) beat Ice Dogs, 3-2. 

The Ducks looked great, the last 5 (including Thanksgiving tournament) record is 2-3-1 including wins over Jr Kings and Ice Dogs.  Two of the losses were by 1 goal and the tie was only because Ducks (2) scored with 30 seconds left.  Ducks (1) are improving a lot the last 6 weeks, they should be ranked 5th, ahead of Ducks (2).
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 16, 2017, 08:11:46 AM
Bears71, ever since I've been nice you don't want to come out and play. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on January 16, 2017, 10:25:28 AM
Bears71, ever since I've been nice you don't want to come out and play. Lol


TTB, my definition of nice and your definition are extremely different.  I have but two questions for you:


1) Did you see the Gulls/Bears game in person?


If you did, you would know that the final score doesn't always indicate what type of game took place.


2) Do you know how many people on this site have stepchildren or are stepchildren? 


You seem to have a mild grasp of the English language; I'd advise you to pull back on the crudeness of your colorful comments.

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 16, 2017, 10:51:19 AM
Bears71, Let me start with this, if I offended you or anyone else on this site with my joke I apologize. There was no ill will intended in regards to that comment. This is a site to have a good time on and not personally attack anyone's family.
I had a friend thats kid plays for the Gulls. I know it was tied at the end of the 1st.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Go Kings_26 on January 16, 2017, 11:19:15 AM
I was a step child and never took this personally. Highly sensitive people may want to consider not participating on this site. Most of us know what you meant TTB
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on January 16, 2017, 01:50:14 PM
Bears71, Let me start with this, if I offended you or anyone else on this site with my joke I apologize. There was no ill will intended in regards to that comment. This is a site to have a good time on and not personally attack anyone's family.
I had a friend thats kid plays for the Gulls. I know it was tied at the end of the 1st.
Tommy, you must be mellowing out.  An apology (thank you) and the fact that you haven't puffed your chest out over the win vs. Artesia, what could possibly be next?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 16, 2017, 08:10:56 PM
Goalie_dad, do the rankings change with the two Ducks victorys. What about the line on the Bears/O. waves game.
Bear71, maybe I will work on curing world hunger.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on January 16, 2017, 08:33:53 PM
Goalie_dad, do the rankings change with the two Ducks victorys. What about the line on the Bears/O. waves game.
Bear71, maybe I will work on curing world hunger.
Bears/Wave got moved to 1/28.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 16, 2017, 08:37:46 PM
Bear71, damn more time for you guys to practice cause I'm rooting for you guys to win more than 2 games. I have a side bet going and the over/under is 3...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on January 17, 2017, 04:48:12 PM
Bear71, damn more time for you guys to practice cause I'm rooting for you guys to win more than 2 games. I have a side bet going and the over/under is 3...
You should have told your kid to let in a few more of our shots to guarantee you winning your bet then!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 17, 2017, 06:05:29 PM
Bears71, I couldn't do that he may snitch. Lol maybe next time.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on January 20, 2017, 11:07:05 AM
Some movement in the rankings with the upsets.  I think we will have another upset this week too, I just don't see the Ice Dogs losing 2 in a row even though I think the Kings are the better team.

1   Jr Gulls
2   Wave (Art)
3   Jr. Kings
4   Jr Ducks (2)
5   Ice Dogs 
6   Jr Ducks (1)
7   Bears
8   Wave (Ont)


Jr Ducks EK  v. Jr Gulls               Jr Gulls by 2
Ice Dogs   v. Jr. Kings                 Ice Dogs by 1
Wave (Art)  v. Jr Ducks Runtso    Wave (Art) by 3
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 20, 2017, 11:31:48 AM
Goal_dad, I was hoping you referring to us possibly upsetting the Gulls. I'm surprised the Kings had nothing to say about them being beat this Sunday. Maybe Ducks1 will also upset the A. Waves.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 22, 2017, 06:05:23 PM
Great team win today, both teams played well. It seemed that the Gulls were missing some players.
Any update on the Kings/Ice Dogs? Was there an upset?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on January 22, 2017, 06:15:40 PM
Kings 3, Ice Dogs 2.  It was a hard-fought game that was evenly matched!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 22, 2017, 08:50:13 PM
Goalie_dad, do you the lines for next week? Also did the rankings change?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Letsgodux on January 22, 2017, 08:53:23 PM
Ducks (1) lost 4-2 to Wave Artesia
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 27, 2017, 07:32:02 AM
Goalie_dad, Amy lines for this weeks games? Were there any changes in the rankings?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on January 27, 2017, 10:28:35 AM
Only movement at the top.  The top 3 are really a pick'em, not a big separation between the top 3.

1   Wave (Art)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Jr Ducks (EK)
5   Ice Dogs 
6   Jr Ducks (Runtso)
7   Bears
8   Wave (Ont)

Bears v. Wave (Ont)            Bears by 3
Jr Ducks EK v. Wave (Ont)   Jr Ducks EK by 6
Wave (Art) v. Bears             Wave (Art) by 4
Jr Gulls v. Jr Ducks Runtso   Gulls by 2
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 28, 2017, 09:30:30 PM
Bear71, did you guys win today? What was the score
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Bear71 on January 29, 2017, 08:35:48 AM
Ontario won 9-4.  No excuses, but

1 - Wave played better
2 - Bears missing several players for All Star Skills
3 - Bear coaches trying new/different combinations
4 - Wave played better
5 - We want you to lose your bet.

Not sure if 2 and 3 made any difference, 1 and 4 (yes, I know they are the same) was the key, as is usually the case at this level.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 29, 2017, 07:24:57 PM
It looks like everyone covered the spread except for the Bears yesterday. Goalie_dad, what's the line for the Gulls vs Artesia Waves ream. And how many are we favored by against the Kings next week.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on January 29, 2017, 07:47:52 PM
TTB, how did your Ducks do against the surging Ontario Wave?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on January 31, 2017, 09:03:42 PM
Goalie_dad, we played well. Were starting to play a lot better. This Sunday will be a great test for us to see where we stand. We look forward to the challenge. What's the lines for this weekends games.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 03, 2017, 08:10:02 AM
Goalie_dad, any lines for this weekend? We're feeling good about this weekend's game.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on February 03, 2017, 11:16:39 AM
No movement this week.  Looks like Wave (Ont) are playing better a win and some closer games. 

1   Wave (Art)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Jr Ducks (EK)
5   Ice Dogs 
6   Jr Ducks (Runtso)
7   Bears
8   Wave (Ont)

Jr Gulls v. Wave (Art)                Wave (Art) by 1
Jr Ducks Runtso v. Wave (Ont)   Jr Ducks Runtso by 2
Ice Dogs v. Bears                      Ice Dogs by 3
Jr Ducks EK v. Jr Kings              Jr Kings by 1
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 05, 2017, 12:05:13 PM
Anyone know who won the Waves/Gulls game this morning.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 05, 2017, 05:49:08 PM
We had the Kings on the ropes today, but we couldn't close the deal. They are a gritty team and found a way to tie the game with 37 seconds left. We were up 4-2 and they pulled their goalie.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 05, 2017, 09:55:20 PM
I had to post this. I had a friend forward me this: He called us the Atlanta Ducks for giving up a 4-2 lead in the 3rd to the Jr. Kings. The only difference is that we didn't take the L!!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 08, 2017, 06:39:53 AM
Goalie_dad, any lines or ranking for this week?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on February 09, 2017, 11:28:42 AM
No movement this week, most games ended as expected.

1   Wave (Art)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr. Kings
4   Jr Ducks (EK)
5   Ice Dogs 
6   Jr Ducks (Runtso)
7   Bears
8   Wave (Ont)

Wave (Ont) v. Wave (Art)          Wave (Art) by 8
Jr Ducks Runtso v. Bears           Jr Ducks Runtso by 2
Ice Dogs v. Jr Ducks EK             Jr Ducks EK by 1
Jr Gulls EK v. Jr Kings                Jr Gulls by 1
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockeyking on February 09, 2017, 02:55:56 PM
Does anyone have any details on the Wave/SD game last week. I was expecting to see the score closer. Did SD get outplayed or could it have gone either way? Is the new team to beat the Wave?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on February 09, 2017, 04:49:14 PM
Does anyone have any details on the Wave/SD game last week. I was expecting to see the score closer. Did SD get outplayed or could it have gone either way? Is the new team to beat the Wave?


Team to beat has always been the Wave.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockeyking on February 10, 2017, 08:08:22 AM
My mistake. I just assumed that the King parents were so obnoxious, it was them.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 10, 2017, 11:43:53 AM
As much as I would like to say the Ducks 2 will win it all. I would put my money on the Kings winning it all. The A.Waves are a two pony show on offense and one pony show on defense. And those ponies will run out of gas!!!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on February 10, 2017, 12:46:29 PM
My mistake. I just assumed that the King parents were so obnoxious, it was them.


Kings parents, "Obnoxious"?  Do tell...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on February 10, 2017, 01:05:29 PM
My mistake. I just assumed that the King parents were so obnoxious, it was them.


Kings parents, "Obnoxious"?  Do tell...


Such obnoxious parents.....   hehehe...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tripod on February 10, 2017, 03:39:02 PM
My mistake. I just assumed that the King parents were so obnoxious, it was them.


Kings parents, "Obnoxious"?  Do tell...

...they whine and complain about other parents...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 10, 2017, 04:09:59 PM
Now this site is heating up. All parents complain including ours. As long as the A. Waves don't win it all I will be happy. Their overrated and soft.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockeyking on February 10, 2017, 04:27:00 PM
I don't care who wins since unfortunately I know it's not going to be us but I'm curious how you can call a first place team overrated and soft? Sounds like someone might be a little sour their little Jonny didn't make the team?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 10, 2017, 04:41:09 PM
If you've seen my previous post younwill know that I've never claimed my son was good. He works hard and true and I'm OK with that. In regards to the A. Waves I wouldnt want my son playing for a team where the dad called the shots. But none the less good luck to your team.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on February 10, 2017, 09:05:26 PM
My mistake. I just assumed that the King parents were so obnoxious, it was them.


Kings parents, "Obnoxious"?  Do tell...

...they whine and complain about other parents...


Aren't you "whining and complaining" about the same thing?  Truth be told, EVERY team has those parents.  #thinargument 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Richard Cranium on February 12, 2017, 11:48:03 AM
Jr Kings 3-1 over the Jr Gulls
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on February 12, 2017, 12:13:42 PM
Jr Kings 3-1 over the Jr Gulls


Like I said the top 3 are very even.  Not surprised Kings won, Wave are still the team to beat!  :D
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 13, 2017, 09:25:46 AM
If you've seen my previous post you will know that I've never claimed my son was good. He works hard and true and I'm OK with that. In regards to the A. Waves I wouldn't want my son playing for a team where the dad called the shots. But none the less good luck to your team.


TTB, who cares who calls the shots?  especially if it does not affect TTB Jr. in any way 


Like goalie_dad has written, the 9 & 10 yr old athletes from the Artesia Wave, SD Jr Gulls & the 9 yr olds from the Jr Kings, ACTUALLY most of the 8 teams from SCAHA Squirt A are playing very well and have improved throughout this season!  Any given Sunday? 


How did TTB Jr. & your beloved Jr Ducks2 do yesterday against the Ice Dogs? 
Nevermind, just saw the results on SCAHA, nice Win.  IMO looks like there may be 4 top teams in Squirt A
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: BBelieber on February 13, 2017, 11:53:58 AM
How did TTB Jr. & your beloved Jr Ducks2 do yesterday against the Ice Dogs? 
Nevermind, just saw the results on SCAHA, nice Win.  IMO looks like there may be 4 top teams in Squirt A


Seeing as how he was removed from the building, we are eager to hear Tommy's view of his coach's behavior during the game yesterday. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 13, 2017, 12:00:22 PM
TTB got tossed as well as Coach?


And the Jr Ducks still won? 

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 12:05:44 PM
Yesterday our kids played well and we won 3-2. Playing KHS is like playing in that Barn in Ontario. The Refing was atrocious again!!!! My daughter can call a better game than that. But none the less we got the win after playing short-handed for half a period.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 13, 2017, 12:11:10 PM
TTB? 

Please do not pass over the fact that Coach and you were both extended an invitation to not watch the game that was taking place in your words, "like playing in that barn in Ontario"
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 12:16:20 PM
If you were at the game you would've realized that the coach didn't deserve the boot. If the ref controls the game from the beginning we wouldn't have parent upset over what's going on. They need to correct the Refing issues before one of these kids gets hurt or a parent storms the ice.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 13, 2017, 12:23:21 PM
If you were at the game you would've realized that the coach didn't deserve the boot. If the ref controls the game from the beginning we wouldn't have parent upset over what's going on. They need to correct the Refing issues before one of these kids gets hurt or a parent storms the ice.

Agreed, but we all know bad officals & crazy parents are not new to USA Hockey or even SCAHA!  I actually even have alot of respect for your Coach, the skills he teaches your athletes and the passion he has for the game and his athletes, BUT; what did YOU do or say that got you booted?  I also have respect for your ability to dish it out and take it here on CalHockey.  But I see that your son wasn't even on the scoresheet yesterday, the Jr Ducks2 '07 goalie played the whole game, what gives TTB?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 12:49:07 PM
The adjectives that were used towards the ref weren't appreciated, it was wrong but sometimes you just can't take anymore of that garage. It was a big game for us and a Coach's Decision.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 13, 2017, 12:57:53 PM
The adjectives that were used towards the ref weren't appreciated, it was wrong but sometimes you just can't take anymore of that garage. It was a big game for us and a Coach's Decision.

Adjectives used by you?  offended or were not appreciated by you?

What was wrong?

Anymore garage?  Maybe you meant garbage?

Sorry, Coach's decision doesn't fly or is SIMPLY NOT THE TRUTH.  Your son would be on the score sheet with 0 saves.  Not even being on the score sheet means they were scratched along with #14 who is on your Jr Ducks2 roster but also not on this score sheet, 02/12/17.

You are quickly losing your integrity TTB, help me understand
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 01:05:37 PM
I used language I shouldn't have. that was a type-o I meant garbage. We knew ahead of time that he wasn't going to play yesterday. It wasn't a surprise, Coach's Decision is another way of saying an internal issue needed to be addressed. Sometime kids need to learn lessons in life. We will be back on the ice this weekend in San Diego and against the Kings on the 26th.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 13, 2017, 01:32:19 PM
I used language I shouldn't have. that was a type-o I meant garbage. We knew ahead of time that he wasn't going to play yesterday. It wasn't a surprise, Coach's Decision is another way of saying an internal issue needed to be addressed. Sometime kids need to learn lessons in life. We will be back on the ice this weekend in San Diego and against the Kings on the 26th.

On that note, best of luck to all teams this Holiday Tournament Weekend + safe travels to all SCAHA families. 

TTB, still avoiding our question?  WHAT DID YOU SAY OR DO THAT GOT YOU THROWN OUT? 
Also, leads me right into another question?  Your athlete was not at the game yesterday because of a "internal issue that needed to be addressed" but you were there in all your glory + you even received a special invitation by the officials of that game to exit an arena that you can't stand attending, early.

Still doesn't jive or add up to me?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 01:41:43 PM
Lol..... I will keep that between the club, ref and I. But don't worry I won't make that mistake again.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on February 13, 2017, 01:49:40 PM
If you were at the game you would've realized that the coach didn't deserve the boot. If the ref controls the game from the beginning we wouldn't have parent upset over what's going on. They need to correct the Refing issues before one of these kids gets hurt or a parent storms the ice.


Let me start by saying I agree that the officiating has been hit or miss all season.  Referees need to understand that they can set the tone early by making calls that blur the lines of legality.  It's better to err on the side of caution then to allow someone to get hurt or to have tensions escalate between players and parents because of missed calls.


That said, without the officials our kids don't get to play the game they love.  I've coached sports from NCAA Division 1 through High School and can tell you being an official is not easy.  I'm just as guilty as anyone else for abusing the refs, and in my line of work having a good rapport with them is essential in avoiding penalties.  Yet hockey will not grow without officials!  How many times have you seen ads asking for help?  Look, at the end of the day, we either need to volunteer to be educated on the rules and become officials or we all need to take a deep breath and understand they are doing the best they can.  It's tough to stay quiet, but really, our commentary doesn't help.


No officials equals no hockey.  I'm not condemning you TTB,  I'm just hoping that maybe all of us passionate people might chose to make a difference?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 01:53:06 PM
DD, I agree and I've been on good behavior since January 1st but yesterday was a bit much. I'm even scheduling a play date with Bears71. Lol
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 13, 2017, 02:25:56 PM
DD, I agree and I've been on good behavior since January 1st but yesterday was a bit much. I'm even scheduling a play date with Bears71. Lol

Well put Disco Dan.

TBT, made it a little over a month, CONGRATULATIONS!  or would you prefer us calling you goalie_dad?  Fellow teammate father of Disco Dan & #4BO you do realize this website tracks all of our IP addresses, correct?   How did you make it from SD's game to KHS to be tossed?

Let our 9 & 10 yr old athletes enjoy the greatest sport in the world!  Please save your "expertise", internal (+external) issues that need to be addressed for those that actually care.  And always remember, in order to insult someone, they must first value your opinion.. Nice try though!

Your welcome:
1) I'll save you the time of logging in as TTB, asking for goalie_dad power rankings on Wed morning,
2) logging out as TTB
3) logging in as goalie_dad
4) copy and paste from www.myhockeyrankings.com (http://www.myhockeyrankings.com), SCAHA Squirt A, but please also add the '07 Jr Kings A
5) log out as goalie_dad
6) log back in as TTB & do whatever it is that you think you are doing

I'll ask for TTB"s, I mean goalie_dad predictions on Wed morning for the final two weeks







Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 02:33:54 PM
KDTK, sounds like he works for Google. Either way it will be a fun playoffs.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 02:39:41 PM
Also considering our game was at 7:30am it would be impossible to make both games unless I owned a private helicopter which I don't considering I'm a civil servant.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 13, 2017, 02:48:12 PM
Also considering our game was at 7:30am it would be impossible to make both games unless I owned a private helicopter which I don't considering I'm a civil servant.

As a civil servant wouldn't you want the opportunity for TTB Jr to play for a team like the Artesia Wave were costs do not seem to matter?  They also seem to be a very nice group of families that are currently favored to win Squirt A?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on February 13, 2017, 02:49:08 PM
Please do not confuse me with TTB, nothing against the guy but...come on now.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 02:59:17 PM
I wouldn't sell my soul for any amount of money. You can't put a price on freedom, nor can you put a price on right from wrong. And Goalie_dad I have no clue who you are but your lines are impressive. If you get a chance who do you see winning the tournaments this weekend.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: BBelieber on February 13, 2017, 04:04:23 PM
If you were at the game you would've realized that the coach didn't deserve the boot. If the ref controls the game from the beginning we wouldn't have parent upset over what's going on. They need to correct the Refing issues before one of these kids gets hurt or a parent storms the ice.


Your coach's shenanigans (and yours, I guess?) started about the time that a kid on your team received a game misconduct for head contact.  And which team's parents were supposed to be upset?  You got tossed just because of your reaction to a perceived bad call against your team?  I'd hate to see your reaction if your kid was the one on the receiving end of the head contact.  I'm picturing you storming the ice.  Or maybe just stalking behind and cursing at the 10-year-old kid in the penalty box, like one of your parents did to the dogs' player the last time these two teams played.  Get a grip, man. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 04:19:09 PM
I will be the first to say there is no place in the game for head shots regardless of who does it. That's the one game I don't play, that trash is dangerous. I can't control what other parents do even if their on our club, but I have never spoken to another person's kid. It's not my place nor would I allow someone else to rip my kid. If it happened we would have words that's for sure. I may be alot but kids potentially getting hurt is not my style or makeup.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 13, 2017, 05:04:06 PM
BB, not trying to defend goalie_dad, I mean TTB but I do not think your facts are correct. 

Looking at the boxscore, the headshot penalty you are referring to happened @ 09:50 of the 2nd
(I would screenshot pic the score sheet, but it has the athletes names on it)
Looks like goalie_dad, I mean TTB & Coach got tossed @ 2:38 & 2:37 of the 2nd.

I'm pretty sure that most parents (even TTB), myself included, would not cheer head contact of any kind
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on February 13, 2017, 05:06:15 PM
BB, not trying to defend goalie_dad, I mean TTB but I do not think your facts are correct. 

Looking at the boxscore, the headshot penalty you are referring to happened @ 09:50 of the 2nd
(I would screenshot pic the score sheet, but it has the athletes names on it)
Looks like goalie_dad, I mean TTB & Coach got tossed @ 2:38 & 2:37 of the 2nd.

I'm pretty sure that most parents (even TTB), myself included, would not cheer head contact of any kind


Dude you are nuts, what makes you think I am also TTB (which I am not)?  I would never let my kid play for that coach.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 05:09:22 PM
KDTK, at least you agree that's not my style. Any parent that is OK with that has bigger issues to deal with. When it's all said and done their still kids.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: BBelieber on February 13, 2017, 05:54:31 PM
BB, not trying to defend goalie_dad, I mean TTB but I do not think your facts are correct. 

Looking at the boxscore, the headshot penalty you are referring to happened @ 09:50 of the 2nd
(I would screenshot pic the score sheet, but it has the athletes names on it)
Looks like goalie_dad, I mean TTB & Coach got tossed @ 2:38 & 2:37 of the 2nd.

I'm pretty sure that most parents (even TTB), myself included, would not cheer head contact of any kind


Head shot penalty seemed to be when the agitation on the Ducks' bench and/or stands began to escalate, not necessarily when coach/Tommy got the boot.  That's why I asked Tommy to explain himself, and his coach.  Just wondering what set everyone off.  If you're not used to refs missing calls by now, suggest you shop elsewhere.  Or at least keep your mouth shut and let the kids play.  Chirping the refs that badly only gets you ejected, and embarrasses your kid. 


Also, I did not say that any Ducks parents cheered the head contact (which contact I did not see, BTW, and from what I know of the offending player, he would absolutely never purposely do).  I see where my comment left room for that interpretation, though. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on February 13, 2017, 08:01:30 PM
Rankings after last weekend:

1   Wave (Art)
2   Jr. Kings 
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (EK)
5   Ice Dogs 
6   Jr Ducks (Runtso)
7   Bears
8   Wave (Ont)

Some Presidents Day Predictions:

San Diego 2017 CA Winter Games Ice Hockey   
Predicted ranking after round robin   
1   Wave (Art)
2   Jr Gulls
3   Jr Ducks EK
4   CAHA
5   Mission Red
6   Tri-Valley
Predicted Semi Final Results   
   Wave Art over CAHA
   Jr Gulls over Jr Ducks EK
Predicted Final Results   
   Wave Art over Jr Gulls


LA Tinseltown Tournament   
Predicted ranking after round robin   
1   Jr Coyotes
2   Jr Kings
3   Hollyburn
4   Bobcats
Predicted Consolation Results   
   Hollyburn over Bobcats
Predicted Final Results   
   Jr Kings over Jr Coyotes


Phoenix Presidents Day Invitational   
Predicted ranking after round robin (top 6)   
1   Bears
2   OCHC Silver
3   Boulder Bison
4   Wave BB
5   Arapahoe
6   SC Blackhawks
Predicted Semi Final Results   
   Bears over Wave BB
   Boulder Bison over OCHC Silver
Predicted Final Results   
   Bears over Boulder Bison


CSAHA Presidents Day Tournament   
Predicted ranking after round robin   
1   Ice Dogs
2   Jr Ducks Runtso
3   McKinney North Stars
4   San Jose Jr Sharks
5   Texas Warriors
6   COS Tigers
Predicted Final Results   
   Ice Dogs over Jr Ducks Runtso
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 13, 2017, 09:41:07 PM
Oh hell, I'll play along.

Thank you for all your hard work goalie_dad.

Thoughts TTB?  Make sure you login using the correct username & password
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on February 13, 2017, 10:03:30 PM
Oh hell, I'll play along.

Thank you for all your hard work goalie_dad.

Thoughts TTB?  Make sure you login using the correct username & password


Seriously, check IP addresses.  We are not the same person.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 10:28:05 PM
Lol...... Check it
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 13, 2017, 10:29:12 PM

Seriously, check IP addresses.  We are not the same person.
[/quote]
You were supposed to reply as TTB? 
Did I miss something?

TTB, more congratulations are in order, you've done a great job today with the english language. 

Just wish I was a fly on the frigid walls of KHS to find out what you said to the ref that gave you the opportunity to leave early from a game which your child was not playing in, yada, yada, yada

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 10:35:51 PM
Vous les gars sont hilarants
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 13, 2017, 10:40:38 PM
Nous Sommes la meme personne mais ne dire a tous
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 14, 2017, 06:16:26 AM
Vous les gars sont hilarants

I'm so glad you find us hilarious goalie_dad, I mean TTB.

Do you think you're the only crazy hockey parent in Southern California that may have grown up in The Great White North 🇨🇦? 

Ê’É™ mÉ™ suˈvjɛ̃? (je me souviens) for our English only friends, this is the motto of the province of Quebec Canada, translated means "I remember",   I remember when the English used to rule us.  But, let's apply to SCAHA

I remember reminders from our Squirt athletes (see what I did there? 👍)
• I'm a 9 or 10 yr old kid
• It's just a game
• Most of the coaches are just volunteers
• The officials are human
• No college scholarships will be handed out today
(Troy Youth Hockey Assoc.)

FYI, this blog is not as anonymous as you think it may be goalie_dad, I mean TTB.  Don't worry, not going to post your child's club, your squirt athletes number or bring up any personal facts about you & your wife's past, actually glad you two are able to work things out.  Yes, travel hockey is a small world.

Happy Valentines Day to everyone, especially "both" goalie_dad & TTB!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on February 14, 2017, 06:25:17 AM
Vous les gars sont hilarants

I'm so glad you find us hilarious goalie_dad, I mean TTB.

Do you think you're the only crazy hockey parent in Southern California that may have grown up in The Great White North 🇨🇦? 

Ê’É™ mÉ™ suˈvjɛ̃? (je me souviens) for our English only friends, this is the motto of the province of Quebec Canada, translated means "I remember",   I remember when the English used to rule us.  But, let's apply to SCAHA

I remember reminders from our Squirt athletes (see what I did there? 👍)
• I'm a 9 or 10 yr old kid
• It's just a game
• Most of the coaches are just volunteers
• The officials are human
• No college scholarships will be handed out today
(Troy Youth Hockey Assoc.)

FYI, this blog is not as anonymous as you think it may be goalie_dad, I mean TTB.  Don't worry, not going to post your child's club, your squirt athletes number or bring up any personal facts about you & your wife's past, actually glad you two are able to work things out.  Yes, travel hockey is a small world.

Happy Valentines Day to everyone, especially "both" goalie_dad & TTB!


IP Spoofers work.  Just saying.


Also..  Looks like this has the possibility of getting a bit personal.   Makes me uncomfortable.    Keeping it to kids hockey is probably best.. and the discussion about peoples personal lives should probably be left to the private messages.


That being said.....


Goalie Dad...    Very nice on the various tournaments.    I thank you for your research.. I'm sure it takes you longer than 15 minutes to get all of it together.   


Good luck to all of the teams playing various tournaments....    It will be interesting to see how it all pans out.



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 15, 2017, 11:47:37 AM
Damn, this site went dark after yesterday's meltdown!!!!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 15, 2017, 05:43:35 PM
Francais:
S'il vous plaît n'hésitez pas à plaisanter en arrière et en avant à vous-même comme TTB & goalie_dad, je suis sûr qu'il a utilisé pour vous apporter tant de plaisir!
English:

Please, feel free to banter back and forth to yourself as TTB & goalie_dad, I'm sure it used to bring you so much enjoyment!

Remember yesterday?
No club will be mentioned, no child jersey number but glad all is currently working out for you?
If other CalHockey parents want to know more about this persons "backstory" please ask your San Diego area SCAHA friends or more specifically ask those same friends about Mrs. TTB, I mean Mrs goalie_dad.

You're playing with fire, hope you're smart enough to not get burned!

LET'S FINISH THIS POST ON A POSITIVE NOTE, PLEASE!
Safe travels to all athletes + their families as we travel to numerous different tournaments this Presidents Day Weekend. 
And may all Squirt A athletes also return healthy and injury free for the last 2 regular season games and their upcoming playoffs!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on February 16, 2017, 06:23:24 AM
Francais:
S'il vous plaît n'hésitez pas à plaisanter en arrière et en avant à vous-même comme TTB & goalie_dad, je suis sûr qu'il a utilisé pour vous apporter tant de plaisir!
English:

Please, feel free to banter back and forth to yourself as TTB & goalie_dad, I'm sure it used to bring you so much enjoyment!

Remember yesterday?
No club will be mentioned, no child jersey number but glad all is currently working out for you?
If other CalHockey parents want to know more about this persons "backstory" please ask your San Diego area SCAHA friends or more specifically ask those same friends about Mrs. TTB, I mean Mrs goalie_dad.

You're playing with fire, hope you're smart enough to not get burned!

LET'S FINISH THIS POST ON A POSITIVE NOTE, PLEASE!
Safe travels to all athletes + their families as we travel to numerous different tournaments this Presidents Day Weekend. 
And may all Squirt A athletes also return healthy and injury free for the last 2 regular season games and their upcoming playoffs!


Ok.. seriously.  The personal shit needs to stop.    Shots fired..   Lines crossed..  All complete.   Please quit it.   No need.   It has no bearing on Squirt A hockey.  Please... keep it in DM if you must continue your banter.


On a SQUIRT A note..


Hoping all of the teams have a good tournaments...   I know who I'll be rooting for...   but I'll keep that to myself as well.



Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: bobbyrobby on February 16, 2017, 10:16:15 PM
Tommy the Bomber, you have lost all credibility on this site.  You claim to be the parent of an 06 goalie on EK's Squirt A2 team.  Yet you also claim to be the parent ejected at Sunday's Ducks vs Icedogs game.  Those that were there know that neither the 06 goalie nor his parents were at the rink and also know that the parent ejected does not have a goalie on EK's team.  Remember Koolaid reminded you the hockey world is small and people know which kid belongs to which parents.  So you have lied.  Question is, are you:
A. 06 Goalie's parent on EK's Squirt A2 and likes to claim other parent ejections as their own
B. parent who was ejected
C. none of the above
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 17, 2017, 06:20:42 AM
please see attached pic
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on February 17, 2017, 07:35:38 AM
BB, asked why I got kicked out originally. I didn't say I did. Also KDTK also assumed it was me that got kicked out so I went with it. I wasn't the parent that was asked to leave.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 17, 2017, 09:29:12 AM

BB, asked why I got kicked out originally. I didn't say I did. Also KDTK also assumed it was me that got kicked out so I went with it. I wasn't the parent that was asked to leave.
MY APOLOGY, you never did say you were the one who was ejected, it was said about you and I did make that assumption, I'm sorry please forgive me.  That being said, there are other things that you allow us "fellow parents to go with" that we know are not true, however, per others request, I will send you direct messages.

There is a lesson here though for the rest of us parents to learn, at the expense of the dad who was ejected.  I started asking so many questions because I do know the father who was ejected, and he is not the '06 goalie dad. 

This embarrassed, humiliated & repentant dad was ejected, match penalty, SCAHA Rule #17.12 Spectator Ejection:
a) The   spectator   will   be   ejected   and   shall   leave   the   rink   property   and   shall   not   be allowed   re-entry   to   the   property   for   a   minimum   of   three   (3)   hours
b) The   scoresheet   shall   be   documented   that   an   ejection   occurred. The referee   will   file   a   report   within   24   hours   with   the   League
c) The   club   of   the   offending   spectator   shall   be   fined   up   to   $250   per   ejection, payable   to   the   League   within   30   days
d) The   spectator   will   immediately   be   suspended   from   all   USA   Hockey   activities   for 30   days.
e) The   team   Manager   is   responsible   for   facilitating   compliance   with   this   rule including   assisting   with   identification   of   the   offending   party

In his words, after one of his sons teammates roughing penalty, he did inappropriately say to the referee,
"your joking right"
"how useless are you" (this is when referee threw him out)
"how & why does the truth offend you"
"you never even gave me a warning"
"I'm not leaving" said this 3 times, but when Coach EK asked him to leave he did leave immediately. 

He did NOT use any profanity & claims he has video evidence.  He was very frustrated with both officials and now per SCAHA #17.12 d) will miss his sons Presidents Day Tournament games, final SCAHA games and some playoffs.

This dad was not present at the time but was also told the reason Coach EK was ejected is because of EK's frustration with the officials also and their lack of communication to him.  It was supposed to be a 5-3 power play, he did not understand nor did he receive an explanation of the delay of game given for the spectator ejection.  The officials were going onto his bench, grabbing athletes and "placing" them in the penalty box, 2 of them actually and after Coach EK's ejection did grab a 3rd, making 4 Jr Ducks in the box, 3 skaters & a goalie on the ice and 1 on the bench.

Like Disco Dan, this suspended dad is usually very appreciative and respectful to the officials, but WOW, lesson learned! Personally I am very glad that I don't think I've ever yelled at this official, because truth be told I also appreciate & respect the officials BUT have said ALOT more, even used expletives while telling them where to go and how fast to get there


 

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: area51 on February 17, 2017, 11:38:34 AM
if you are one of the many (me included) that sometimes just can't help but yell at the refs or likes to yell words of encouragement to their kids (move your feet), best thing to do is never sit in the bleachers. stay down low behind the glass!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Xfactor_56 on February 20, 2017, 05:23:21 PM
if you are one of the many (me included) that sometimes just can't help but yell at the refs or likes to yell words of encouragement to their kids (move your feet), best thing to do is never sit in the bleachers. stay down low behind the glass!

THIS!!  :)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 20, 2017, 10:18:10 PM
if you are one of the many (me included) that sometimes just can't help but yell at the refs or likes to yell words of encouragement to their kids (move your feet), best thing to do is never sit in the bleachers. stay down low behind the glass!
Oh boy, anybody at SD Cal State Games, Escondido Iceoplex, PWA, Sunday 2/20/17, PWA game with pictures or story?

Allegedly a parent "did not stay behind the glass" instead pushing/punching opposing team players as well as grabbing the goalie by his bucket?

Was given the opportunity to exit the arena in bracelets by 2 SD 👮 officers in a 4 door sedan with lights on top! 

That's gonna be more than a 30 day USA Hockey suspension!


Pics & story please?!

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 21, 2017, 05:54:59 AM
CONGRATULATIONS!

Anaheim Jr Ice Dogs - Squirt A
Colorado Springs Tiger Hockey
President's Day '17 CHAMPIONS

Anaheim Jr Ducks1 - Squirt A Runtso
Colorado Springs Tiger Hockey
President's Day '17 got Silver

Artesia Wave - Squirt A
SD Cal State Games
President's Day '17 got Silver

California Golden Bears - Squirt A
Arizona Hockey Union

President's Day Invitational '17 CHAMPIONS
(Bear71 & JustSaying, thought you were going to be in Las Vegas? Please see disclaimer below)

LA Jr Kings - Squirt A
Tinseltown? @ TSC El Segundo
President's Day '17 got Silver

SD Jr Gulls - Squirt A
SD Cal State Games
President's Day '17 CHAMPIONS

(Tournaments and above results found on CA Rubber Magazine.  Parents, please update and tell us corrections.)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: BBelieber on February 21, 2017, 09:41:30 AM
He did NOT use any profanity & claims he has video evidence.  He was very frustrated with both officials and now per SCAHA #17.12 d) will miss his sons Presidents Day Tournament games, final SCAHA games and some playoffs.

Like Disco Dan, this suspended dad is usually very appreciative and respectful to the officials, but WOW, lesson learned! Personally I am very glad that I don't think I've ever yelled at this official, because truth be told I also appreciate & respect the officials BUT have said ALOT more, even used expletives while telling them where to go and how fast to get there 
If this version of the facts is accurate, with video proof, seems like a 30-day suspension is excessive.  No parent penalty/suspension shows on SCAHA page currently for 2/12/17 game.  I assume your "embarrassed, humiliated & repentant dad" is challenging the suspension, and was able to enjoy some Presidents' Day Hockey in person, as opposed to via FaceTime. 


TTB, your trolling needs work.  You ain't no Zamboni Driver.  RIP, Zam. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on February 21, 2017, 09:54:18 AM
CONGRATULATIONS!

Anaheim Jr Ice Dogs - Squirt A
Colorado Springs Tiger Hockey
President's Day '17 CHAMPIONS

Anaheim Jr Ducks1 - Squirt A Runtso
Colorado Springs Tiger Hockey
President's Day '17 got Silver

Artesia Wave - Squirt A
SD Cal State Games
President's Day '17 got Silver

California Golden Bears - Squirt A
Arizona Hockey Union

President's Day Invitational '17 CHAMPIONS
(Bear71 & JustSaying, thought you were going to be in Las Vegas? Please see disclaimer below)

LA Jr Kings - Squirt A
Tinseltown? @ TSC El Segundo
President's Day '17 got Silver

SD Jr Gulls - Squirt A
SD Cal State Games
President's Day '17 CHAMPIONS

(Tournaments and above results found on CA Rubber Magazine.  Parents, please update and tell us corrections.)


I did well this weekend on my picks, 7 of the 8 finalist and 2-2 in picking champs. 

Congrats to all the Squirt A teams that represented So Cal well.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 22, 2017, 04:51:29 AM
"TTB, your trolling needs work.  You ain't no Zamboni Driver.  RIP, Zam."


Truer words have never been spoken BB, RIP Zamboni Driver!  Rumor has it that though that ZD's "wonderful words of wisdoms & misspellings" are now being presented to us under the screen name Kangaroo Jack.

Also, your assumption is correct.  Suspension was challenged and sentence reduced to 1 game.

TTB, I mean GD, he also mentioned to me that your team went 3-0 in their SD tournament, scoring 29 goals while allowing only 3, yet TTB Jr & his teammates were only offered a 3rd vs 4th Bronze Game, at the SD Tournament.  Making 3 SCAHA Squirt A teams 3-0 in that Tournament, tiebreaker was Goals Against. 1st place - Jr Gulls allowing only 1 & 2nd place - Wave allowing only 2, getting them into the Championship Game. 

Great Job TTB Jr., I mean GD Jr., who also won their Bronze Game 7-0. Meaning TTB Jr, I mean GD Jr and the '07 goalie allowed only 3 goals against in 4 games.  The Champion Jr Gulls allowed 4 goals in 4 games and The Wave allowed only 8 goals through 4 games, impressive.

GD, I mean TTB Jr. great job with your picks though & agreed, GREAT JOB SoCal Squirt A teams!


Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on February 22, 2017, 10:06:35 AM
"TTB, your trolling needs work.  You ain't no Zamboni Driver.  RIP, Zam."


Truer words have never been spoken BB, RIP Zamboni Driver!  Rumor has it that though that ZD's "wonderful words of wisdoms & misspellings" are now being presented to us under the screen name Kangaroo Jack.

Also, your assumption is correct.  Suspension was challenged and sentence reduced to 1 game.

TTB, I mean GD, he also mentioned to me that your team went 3-0 in their SD tournament, scoring 29 goals while allowing only 3, yet TTB Jr & his teammates were only offered a 3rd vs 4th Bronze Game, at the SD Tournament.  Making 3 SCAHA Squirt A teams 3-0 in that Tournament, tiebreaker was Goals Against. 1st place - Jr Gulls allowing only 1 & 2nd place - Wave allowing only 2, getting them into the Championship Game. 

Great Job TTB Jr., I mean GD Jr., who also won their Bronze Game 7-0. Meaning TTB Jr, I mean GD Jr and the '07 goalie allowed only 3 goals against in 4 games.  The Champion Jr Gulls allowed 4 goals in 4 games and The Wave allowed only 8 goals through 4 games, impressive.

GD, I mean TTB Jr. great job with your picks though & agreed, GREAT JOB SoCal Squirt A teams!




Dude, drop it.  We are not the same person. 
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 22, 2017, 04:01:59 PM
"Dude, drop it.  We are not the same person."

Dude? How about Mr KFTK to you?  The 100% denial defense, how original?  I hope the retainer you paid your counsel is reasonable priced, or at least something you can afford. 
FYI, you are dealing with CRAZY hockey parents here, usually very educated, hard working and successful people who will do almost anything for their children + we are NOT stupid!
FREE ADVICE (you do get what you pay for!) Your money would be better spent on DR's prescription for your alter ego/split personality disorder. 

Find the timing very interesting that TTB has gone keyboard silent.
IMO this CalHockey board loves your power rankings, picks and predictions.
Let's allow TTB to drift away into the sunset and keep your posts to the very well put together, time consuming entertainment. 

As previously mentioned, there are people here who know ALOT about you that does not need to be posted on this CalHockey board, comprenez vous?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on February 23, 2017, 06:09:01 AM
Its like..  when you watch a train wreck... and you know you should run in and help out.. but you can't stop watching it..  waiting for it...   


Maybe more like..  back in 2nd grade..  when you knew Jessie was about to get his clock cleaned.. but you kept watching..  cheering..   waiting....




The personal shit needs to stop.  Seriously.   It isn't hockey related.. its uncomfortable to read..  and its downright childish.      Im not a moderator here.. but I know they read all of the BS that everyone on here posts.   I would love if they stepped in and asked..  however pointedly they assume to do it..   that the childish crap stop.    Keep it classy.  Keep it hockey related.   I'd rather this NOT turn into an episode of Maury.


Goalie Dad..  Any lines on the games this weekend?    Thanks!


...wait.  Maybe I should say ... Mr. Goalie Dad.      ... nevermind.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 4 check on February 23, 2017, 08:21:05 AM
Its like..  when you watch a train wreck... and you know you should run in and help out.. but you can't stop watching it..  waiting for it...   


Maybe more like..  back in 2nd grade..  when you knew Jessie was about to get his clock cleaned.. but you kept watching..  cheering..   waiting....




The personal shit needs to stop.  Seriously.   It isn't hockey related.. its uncomfortable to read..  and its downright childish.      Im not a moderator here.. but I know they read all of the BS that everyone on here posts.   I would love if they stepped in and asked..  however pointedly they assume to do it..   that the childish crap stop.    Keep it classy.  Keep it hockey related.   I'd rather this NOT turn into an episode of Maury.


Goalie Dad..  Any lines on the games this weekend?    Thanks!


...wait.  Maybe I should say ... Mr. Goalie Dad.      ... nevermind.

There was a board that did what you are suggesting, it was called SoCalHockey, they monitored the boards and gave 30 day suspensions....the board ended up sucking, that is why this board was created, I also think the posts get odd once in a while, but if they sensor anything but names and numbers of kids, this board will turn into what it was created to replace.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 2kids2teamsnomoney on February 23, 2017, 10:26:43 AM
Its like..  when you watch a train wreck... and you know you should run in and help out.. but you can't stop watching it..  waiting for it...   


Maybe more like..  back in 2nd grade..  when you knew Jessie was about to get his clock cleaned.. but you kept watching..  cheering..   waiting....




The personal shit needs to stop.  Seriously.   It isn't hockey related.. its uncomfortable to read..  and its downright childish.      Im not a moderator here.. but I know they read all of the BS that everyone on here posts.   I would love if they stepped in and asked..  however pointedly they assume to do it..   that the childish crap stop.    Keep it classy.  Keep it hockey related.   I'd rather this NOT turn into an episode of Maury.


Goalie Dad..  Any lines on the games this weekend?    Thanks!


...wait.  Maybe I should say ... Mr. Goalie Dad.      ... nevermind.

There was a board that did what you are suggesting, it was called SoCalHockey, they monitored the boards and gave 30 day suspensions....the board ended up sucking, that is why this board was created, I also think the posts get odd once in a while, but if they sensor anything but names and numbers of kids, this board will turn into what it was created to replace.


I remember that board, nothing like sitting back Monday Morning with a hot cup of coffee and read the crazy posts. (Makes me miss Cougar Dad)


But people were out of control and COLD, they would forget the players were 10-12 (the group that took it too far were PeeWee AA 98&99) they would call players out by number and bitch about the player. They gave some really good players, nasty nick names and it wasn't nice. They hated the guy who owns KHS and rant on and on about KHS Jr., forgetting he is just a kid who wants to play hockey and by the way that kid was AWESOME and a very nice boy. 


Mr. KHS got tired of all the crap being said about him, his club and most of all his 11 year old son. So Mr. KHS hired a lawyer and had a few letters sent to the old board ownership.
That is when they started to crack down. People got pissed and started this board.


This board started out as the new place to come bitch about the Wildcats. But time moves on, Clubs changer owners, Coaches change teams, the CRAZY good kids that pissed everyone off at the time left to better hockey markets.


Honestly nothing I've seen on these board over the last few seasons has been anything like the nasty comments that gave birth to this site.


Most of us that were on the old boards have kids that have aged out or stopped playing so they can enjoy the high school years.  The new parents are a kinder generation :-)


Enjoy the time and remember they are only kids, we are all just families.


Now back to the witty banter :-)  :o
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on February 23, 2017, 10:35:16 AM
1   Wave (Art)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (EK)
5   Ice Dogs 
6   Jr Ducks (Runtso)
7   Bears
8   Wave (Ont)

Jr Gulls v. Bears                Jr Gulls by 3
Ice Dogs v. Wave (Ont)     Ice Dogs by 4
Jr Ducks EK v. Jr Kings      Jr Kings by 2

Friday tournament game from North Dakota:
Wave (Art) v. Nashville Jr Preds      Jr Preds by 1

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on February 23, 2017, 04:34:41 PM

1   Wave (Art)
2   Jr. Kings
3   Jr Gulls
4   Jr Ducks (EK)
5   Ice Dogs 
6   Jr Ducks (Runtso)
7   Bears
8   Wave (Ont)

Jr Gulls v. Bears                Jr Gulls by 3
Ice Dogs v. Wave (Ont)     Ice Dogs by 4
Jr Ducks EK v. Jr Kings      Jr Kings by 2

Friday tournament game from North Dakota:
Wave (Art) v. Nashville Jr Preds      Jr Preds by 1
👍
GD, thank you for your time, research & the picks.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on March 04, 2017, 02:30:38 PM
Picks for this weekend.

Wave (Art) by 2 over Ice Dogs
Jr Kings by 1 over Jr Ducks (Runtso)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 2kids2teamsnomoney on March 08, 2017, 08:45:53 AM
Sure is quiet around here ... must be the calm before the storm.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on March 08, 2017, 10:12:25 AM
Any thoughts on the lines for round one of the playoffs?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on March 08, 2017, 03:57:46 PM
We're bound for some surprises this weekend for sure!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on March 08, 2017, 04:36:02 PM
We're bound for some surprises this weekend for sure!

A very bold prediction from Disco Dan  8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on March 08, 2017, 09:13:46 PM
I'm planning on slow-playing my predictions.  After all, I'm no Goalie Dad!
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on March 10, 2017, 06:43:10 AM
I'm planning on slow-playing my predictions.  After all, I'm no Goalie Dad!




why did I just hear some old 70's disco playing when I read that post?    Oh lord...
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Nowhearthis on March 10, 2017, 07:38:44 AM
Cause it's playoffs??  Stayin Alive, Stayin Alive....
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on March 10, 2017, 01:16:09 PM
Cause it's playoffs??  Stayin Alive, Stayin Alive....


Well done, grasshopper.   well done.

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on March 10, 2017, 06:21:55 PM
My picks are Jr Ducks EK, Wave Art, Jr Gulls and Jr Ducks Runtso make it to semis.  Sorry Kings and Ice Dog fans, you guys haven't looked as strong recently.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on March 10, 2017, 06:22:21 PM
Is TTB still alive?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: trans4761 on March 10, 2017, 07:28:51 PM
My picks are Jr Ducks EK, Wave Art, Jr Gulls and Jr Ducks Runtso make it to semis.  Sorry Kings and Ice Dog fans, you guys haven't looked as strong recently.
B.O. IS GOING TO BE PISSED !!

Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Disco Dan on March 11, 2017, 04:43:56 PM
Kings won in a spirited matchup over Ducks Runtso, 4-3.  Does anyone else know the other scores?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on March 12, 2017, 08:52:21 AM
SCAHA Playoff page is doing a great job of getting scores up quickly:
http://www.scaha.com/scaha/playoffscentral.xhtml
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: #4BobbyOrr on March 12, 2017, 01:19:37 PM
My picks are Jr Ducks EK, Wave Art, Jr Gulls and Jr Ducks Runtso make it to semis.  Sorry Kings and Ice Dog fans, you guys haven't looked as strong recently.
B.O. IS GOING TO BE PISSED !!




Nope.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: goalie_dad on March 12, 2017, 01:35:25 PM
Kings played well from behind in both games.  They never gave up and played hard, congrats.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: 2kids2teamsnomoney on March 13, 2017, 03:45:02 PM
After all the games this weekend, nobody has anything to say.  :o
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: skates on March 13, 2017, 06:59:13 PM
After all the games this weekend, nobody has anything to say.  :o


My kids team is out after this past weekend. I don't have anything to say except for good luck to the remaining teams.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Kalishock on March 14, 2017, 01:44:41 PM
The following rounds should be pretty intense..  given the teams still left skating....
Title: Top Tier Toronto 07
Post by: GOALIE-STARS on March 16, 2017, 10:26:01 AM
Any 07 interested in Top Tier Toronto in May 5-7 should look under the Special Interest section - Professional Services here in Cal Hockey Home Page it is listed as Detroit Warrior Wizard Hockey.....Looks like they are putting a team together and will play against some Brick 07 teams. They are also doing a skating clinic a Lakewood end of March to look at players.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: keepdrinkinthekoolaid on March 20, 2017, 10:50:47 AM
CONGRATULATIONS SCAHA Squirt A Finalists:

Regular Season #1 - Artesia Wave with a 6-5 OT Win over Jr Kings
Regular Season #2 - SD Jr Gulls with a 2-1 Win over Jr Ducks2

Please, also represent SCAHA well as you travel to CAHA State Finals!


Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: trans4761 on March 26, 2017, 08:42:53 PM
Corgrats to the Wave in Winning the SQ A division.
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Hockeyking on March 27, 2017, 02:00:16 PM
Anyone know any details of the WAve/SD game other than the Wave won? Who dominated? Good game or blow out?
Title: Re: Squirt A 2016-17
Post by: Tommy, The Bomber on May 31, 2017, 10:36:20 PM
I'm Back just in time to say bye to Squirts and hello to PeeWee. Good Luck to all Teir 2 players!